Cargando…
Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial
Biopsychosocial intervention has been suggested as a complementary treatment strategy for patients with chronic conditions. We compared the effect of a mind–body intervention (MBI), relative to treatment-as-usual (TAU) on WHO-5 Well-being Index during an intensive period of 12 weeks and follow-up at...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143107 |
_version_ | 1783727653758435328 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Thao Thi Jensen, Christian G. Khoury, Lina Deleuran, Bent Blom, Esther S. Breinholt, Thomas Christensen, Robin Skov, Lone |
author_facet | Nguyen, Thao Thi Jensen, Christian G. Khoury, Lina Deleuran, Bent Blom, Esther S. Breinholt, Thomas Christensen, Robin Skov, Lone |
author_sort | Nguyen, Thao Thi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biopsychosocial intervention has been suggested as a complementary treatment strategy for patients with chronic conditions. We compared the effect of a mind–body intervention (MBI), relative to treatment-as-usual (TAU) on WHO-5 Well-being Index during an intensive period of 12 weeks and follow-up at week 26 among patients with either psoriasis (PsO) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The MBI was based on the ‘Relaxation Response Resiliency Program’ and the ‘Open and Calm Program’, as well as ‘Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction’ (MBSR). The trial was randomized, management-as-usual, and controlled. Statistical analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population using repeated measures and mixed effects models (NCT03888261). We screened 39 potential participants, 35 of which (PsO, n = 20; RA, n = 15) met the eligibility criteria and were randomized: 17 in the MBI group and 18 in the TAU group. Attrition from the intervention program was 19%, with 65% of MBI patients and 71% of TAU patients completing the outcome assessments. After 12 weeks, a statistically significant difference in WHO-5 was observed between the groups (p = 0.019). However, according to the protocol, during the entire trial period, the average (least squares mean values) WHO-5 score was higher although not statistically significant in the MBI group (65.3) compared with the TAU group (59.1), corresponding to a between-group difference over 26 weeks of 6.15 (95% CI: −0.26 to 12.56; p = 0.060). All things considered, adding biopsychosocial intervention to clinical practice to patients with conditions, such as PsO and RA, could potentially improve health-related quality of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8305779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83057792021-07-25 Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial Nguyen, Thao Thi Jensen, Christian G. Khoury, Lina Deleuran, Bent Blom, Esther S. Breinholt, Thomas Christensen, Robin Skov, Lone J Clin Med Article Biopsychosocial intervention has been suggested as a complementary treatment strategy for patients with chronic conditions. We compared the effect of a mind–body intervention (MBI), relative to treatment-as-usual (TAU) on WHO-5 Well-being Index during an intensive period of 12 weeks and follow-up at week 26 among patients with either psoriasis (PsO) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The MBI was based on the ‘Relaxation Response Resiliency Program’ and the ‘Open and Calm Program’, as well as ‘Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction’ (MBSR). The trial was randomized, management-as-usual, and controlled. Statistical analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population using repeated measures and mixed effects models (NCT03888261). We screened 39 potential participants, 35 of which (PsO, n = 20; RA, n = 15) met the eligibility criteria and were randomized: 17 in the MBI group and 18 in the TAU group. Attrition from the intervention program was 19%, with 65% of MBI patients and 71% of TAU patients completing the outcome assessments. After 12 weeks, a statistically significant difference in WHO-5 was observed between the groups (p = 0.019). However, according to the protocol, during the entire trial period, the average (least squares mean values) WHO-5 score was higher although not statistically significant in the MBI group (65.3) compared with the TAU group (59.1), corresponding to a between-group difference over 26 weeks of 6.15 (95% CI: −0.26 to 12.56; p = 0.060). All things considered, adding biopsychosocial intervention to clinical practice to patients with conditions, such as PsO and RA, could potentially improve health-related quality of life. MDPI 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8305779/ /pubmed/34300273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143107 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nguyen, Thao Thi Jensen, Christian G. Khoury, Lina Deleuran, Bent Blom, Esther S. Breinholt, Thomas Christensen, Robin Skov, Lone Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial |
title | Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of mind–body intervention for inflammatory conditions: results from a 26-week randomized, non-blinded, parallel-group trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenthaothi effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial AT jensenchristiang effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial AT khourylina effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial AT deleuranbent effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial AT blomesthers effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial AT breinholtthomas effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial AT christensenrobin effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial AT skovlone effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial |