Cargando…

Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial

Biopsychosocial intervention has been suggested as a complementary treatment strategy for patients with chronic conditions. We compared the effect of a mind–body intervention (MBI), relative to treatment-as-usual (TAU) on WHO-5 Well-being Index during an intensive period of 12 weeks and follow-up at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Thao Thi, Jensen, Christian G., Khoury, Lina, Deleuran, Bent, Blom, Esther S., Breinholt, Thomas, Christensen, Robin, Skov, Lone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300273
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143107
_version_ 1783727653758435328
author Nguyen, Thao Thi
Jensen, Christian G.
Khoury, Lina
Deleuran, Bent
Blom, Esther S.
Breinholt, Thomas
Christensen, Robin
Skov, Lone
author_facet Nguyen, Thao Thi
Jensen, Christian G.
Khoury, Lina
Deleuran, Bent
Blom, Esther S.
Breinholt, Thomas
Christensen, Robin
Skov, Lone
author_sort Nguyen, Thao Thi
collection PubMed
description Biopsychosocial intervention has been suggested as a complementary treatment strategy for patients with chronic conditions. We compared the effect of a mind–body intervention (MBI), relative to treatment-as-usual (TAU) on WHO-5 Well-being Index during an intensive period of 12 weeks and follow-up at week 26 among patients with either psoriasis (PsO) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The MBI was based on the ‘Relaxation Response Resiliency Program’ and the ‘Open and Calm Program’, as well as ‘Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction’ (MBSR). The trial was randomized, management-as-usual, and controlled. Statistical analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population using repeated measures and mixed effects models (NCT03888261). We screened 39 potential participants, 35 of which (PsO, n = 20; RA, n = 15) met the eligibility criteria and were randomized: 17 in the MBI group and 18 in the TAU group. Attrition from the intervention program was 19%, with 65% of MBI patients and 71% of TAU patients completing the outcome assessments. After 12 weeks, a statistically significant difference in WHO-5 was observed between the groups (p = 0.019). However, according to the protocol, during the entire trial period, the average (least squares mean values) WHO-5 score was higher although not statistically significant in the MBI group (65.3) compared with the TAU group (59.1), corresponding to a between-group difference over 26 weeks of 6.15 (95% CI: −0.26 to 12.56; p = 0.060). All things considered, adding biopsychosocial intervention to clinical practice to patients with conditions, such as PsO and RA, could potentially improve health-related quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8305779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83057792021-07-25 Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial Nguyen, Thao Thi Jensen, Christian G. Khoury, Lina Deleuran, Bent Blom, Esther S. Breinholt, Thomas Christensen, Robin Skov, Lone J Clin Med Article Biopsychosocial intervention has been suggested as a complementary treatment strategy for patients with chronic conditions. We compared the effect of a mind–body intervention (MBI), relative to treatment-as-usual (TAU) on WHO-5 Well-being Index during an intensive period of 12 weeks and follow-up at week 26 among patients with either psoriasis (PsO) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The MBI was based on the ‘Relaxation Response Resiliency Program’ and the ‘Open and Calm Program’, as well as ‘Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction’ (MBSR). The trial was randomized, management-as-usual, and controlled. Statistical analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population using repeated measures and mixed effects models (NCT03888261). We screened 39 potential participants, 35 of which (PsO, n = 20; RA, n = 15) met the eligibility criteria and were randomized: 17 in the MBI group and 18 in the TAU group. Attrition from the intervention program was 19%, with 65% of MBI patients and 71% of TAU patients completing the outcome assessments. After 12 weeks, a statistically significant difference in WHO-5 was observed between the groups (p = 0.019). However, according to the protocol, during the entire trial period, the average (least squares mean values) WHO-5 score was higher although not statistically significant in the MBI group (65.3) compared with the TAU group (59.1), corresponding to a between-group difference over 26 weeks of 6.15 (95% CI: −0.26 to 12.56; p = 0.060). All things considered, adding biopsychosocial intervention to clinical practice to patients with conditions, such as PsO and RA, could potentially improve health-related quality of life. MDPI 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8305779/ /pubmed/34300273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143107 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nguyen, Thao Thi
Jensen, Christian G.
Khoury, Lina
Deleuran, Bent
Blom, Esther S.
Breinholt, Thomas
Christensen, Robin
Skov, Lone
Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial
title Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial
title_full Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial
title_short Effectiveness of Mind–Body Intervention for Inflammatory Conditions: Results from a 26-Week Randomized, Non-Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial
title_sort effectiveness of mind–body intervention for inflammatory conditions: results from a 26-week randomized, non-blinded, parallel-group trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300273
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143107
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenthaothi effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial
AT jensenchristiang effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial
AT khourylina effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial
AT deleuranbent effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial
AT blomesthers effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial
AT breinholtthomas effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial
AT christensenrobin effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial
AT skovlone effectivenessofmindbodyinterventionforinflammatoryconditionsresultsfroma26weekrandomizednonblindedparallelgrouptrial