Cargando…
Machine Assisted Experimentation of Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Systems
Optimization of extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB) parameters have been systematically conducted through experimentation. However, the process is time- and resource-intensive and not easily translatable to other laboratories. This study approaches EBB parameter optimization through machine learning (...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209404 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12070780 |
_version_ | 1783727695670018048 |
---|---|
author | Tian, Shuyu Stevens, Rory McInnes, Bridget T. Lewinski, Nastassja A. |
author_facet | Tian, Shuyu Stevens, Rory McInnes, Bridget T. Lewinski, Nastassja A. |
author_sort | Tian, Shuyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Optimization of extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB) parameters have been systematically conducted through experimentation. However, the process is time- and resource-intensive and not easily translatable to other laboratories. This study approaches EBB parameter optimization through machine learning (ML) models trained using data collected from the published literature. We investigated regression-based and classification-based ML models and their abilities to predict printing outcomes of cell viability and filament diameter for cell-containing alginate and gelatin composite bioinks. In addition, we interrogated if regression-based models can predict suitable extrusion pressure given the desired cell viability when keeping other experimental parameters constant. We also compared models trained across data from general literature to models trained across data from one literature source that utilized alginate and gelatin bioinks. The results indicate that models trained on large amounts of data can impart physical trends on cell viability, filament diameter, and extrusion pressure seen in past literature. Regression models trained on the larger dataset also predict cell viability closer to experimental values for material concentration combinations not seen in training data of the single-paper-based regression models. While the best performing classification models for cell viability can achieve an average prediction accuracy of 70%, the cell viability predictions remained constant despite altering input parameter combinations. Our trained models on bioprinting literature data show the potential usage of applying ML models to bioprinting experimental design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8305959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83059592021-07-25 Machine Assisted Experimentation of Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Systems Tian, Shuyu Stevens, Rory McInnes, Bridget T. Lewinski, Nastassja A. Micromachines (Basel) Article Optimization of extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB) parameters have been systematically conducted through experimentation. However, the process is time- and resource-intensive and not easily translatable to other laboratories. This study approaches EBB parameter optimization through machine learning (ML) models trained using data collected from the published literature. We investigated regression-based and classification-based ML models and their abilities to predict printing outcomes of cell viability and filament diameter for cell-containing alginate and gelatin composite bioinks. In addition, we interrogated if regression-based models can predict suitable extrusion pressure given the desired cell viability when keeping other experimental parameters constant. We also compared models trained across data from general literature to models trained across data from one literature source that utilized alginate and gelatin bioinks. The results indicate that models trained on large amounts of data can impart physical trends on cell viability, filament diameter, and extrusion pressure seen in past literature. Regression models trained on the larger dataset also predict cell viability closer to experimental values for material concentration combinations not seen in training data of the single-paper-based regression models. While the best performing classification models for cell viability can achieve an average prediction accuracy of 70%, the cell viability predictions remained constant despite altering input parameter combinations. Our trained models on bioprinting literature data show the potential usage of applying ML models to bioprinting experimental design. MDPI 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8305959/ /pubmed/34209404 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12070780 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tian, Shuyu Stevens, Rory McInnes, Bridget T. Lewinski, Nastassja A. Machine Assisted Experimentation of Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Systems |
title | Machine Assisted Experimentation of Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Systems |
title_full | Machine Assisted Experimentation of Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Systems |
title_fullStr | Machine Assisted Experimentation of Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Assisted Experimentation of Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Systems |
title_short | Machine Assisted Experimentation of Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Systems |
title_sort | machine assisted experimentation of extrusion-based bioprinting systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209404 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12070780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tianshuyu machineassistedexperimentationofextrusionbasedbioprintingsystems AT stevensrory machineassistedexperimentationofextrusionbasedbioprintingsystems AT mcinnesbridgett machineassistedexperimentationofextrusionbasedbioprintingsystems AT lewinskinastassjaa machineassistedexperimentationofextrusionbasedbioprintingsystems |