Cargando…

Application of S-1 Bifactor Model to Evaluate the Structural Validity of TMMS-24

(1) Background: Recent studies have shown that the internal structure of TMMS-24 can be conceptualized as a bifactor. However, these studies, based exclusively on the evaluation of the fit of the model, fail to show the existence of a general factor of strong emotional intelligence and have neglecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ondé, Daniel, Alvarado, Jesús M., Sastre, Santiago, Azañedo, Carolina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147427
_version_ 1783727702913581056
author Ondé, Daniel
Alvarado, Jesús M.
Sastre, Santiago
Azañedo, Carolina M.
author_facet Ondé, Daniel
Alvarado, Jesús M.
Sastre, Santiago
Azañedo, Carolina M.
author_sort Ondé, Daniel
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Recent studies have shown that the internal structure of TMMS-24 can be conceptualized as a bifactor. However, these studies, based exclusively on the evaluation of the fit of the model, fail to show the existence of a general factor of strong emotional intelligence and have neglected the evaluation of the specific factors of attention, clarity and repair. The main goal of this work is to evaluate the degree of determination and reliability of the specific factors of TMMS-24 using a bifactor S-1 model. (2) Methods: We administered TMMS-24 to a sample of 384 students from middle and high schools (58.1% girls; mean age = 15.5; SD = 1.8). (3) Results: The specific TMMS-24 factors are better determined and present a higher internal consistency than the general factor. Furthermore, the bifactor S-1 model shows the existence of a hierarchical relationship between the attention factor and the clarity and repair factors. The S-1 bifactor model is the only one that was shown to be invariant as a function of the sex of the participants. (4) Conclusions: The S-1 bifactor model has proven to be a promising tool for capturing the structural complexity of TMMS-24. Its application indicates that it is not advisable to use the sum score of the items, since it would be contaminated by the attention factor. In addition, this score would not be invariant either, that is, comparisons by sex would be invalid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8305991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83059912021-07-25 Application of S-1 Bifactor Model to Evaluate the Structural Validity of TMMS-24 Ondé, Daniel Alvarado, Jesús M. Sastre, Santiago Azañedo, Carolina M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article (1) Background: Recent studies have shown that the internal structure of TMMS-24 can be conceptualized as a bifactor. However, these studies, based exclusively on the evaluation of the fit of the model, fail to show the existence of a general factor of strong emotional intelligence and have neglected the evaluation of the specific factors of attention, clarity and repair. The main goal of this work is to evaluate the degree of determination and reliability of the specific factors of TMMS-24 using a bifactor S-1 model. (2) Methods: We administered TMMS-24 to a sample of 384 students from middle and high schools (58.1% girls; mean age = 15.5; SD = 1.8). (3) Results: The specific TMMS-24 factors are better determined and present a higher internal consistency than the general factor. Furthermore, the bifactor S-1 model shows the existence of a hierarchical relationship between the attention factor and the clarity and repair factors. The S-1 bifactor model is the only one that was shown to be invariant as a function of the sex of the participants. (4) Conclusions: The S-1 bifactor model has proven to be a promising tool for capturing the structural complexity of TMMS-24. Its application indicates that it is not advisable to use the sum score of the items, since it would be contaminated by the attention factor. In addition, this score would not be invariant either, that is, comparisons by sex would be invalid. MDPI 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8305991/ /pubmed/34299879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147427 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ondé, Daniel
Alvarado, Jesús M.
Sastre, Santiago
Azañedo, Carolina M.
Application of S-1 Bifactor Model to Evaluate the Structural Validity of TMMS-24
title Application of S-1 Bifactor Model to Evaluate the Structural Validity of TMMS-24
title_full Application of S-1 Bifactor Model to Evaluate the Structural Validity of TMMS-24
title_fullStr Application of S-1 Bifactor Model to Evaluate the Structural Validity of TMMS-24
title_full_unstemmed Application of S-1 Bifactor Model to Evaluate the Structural Validity of TMMS-24
title_short Application of S-1 Bifactor Model to Evaluate the Structural Validity of TMMS-24
title_sort application of s-1 bifactor model to evaluate the structural validity of tmms-24
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147427
work_keys_str_mv AT ondedaniel applicationofs1bifactormodeltoevaluatethestructuralvalidityoftmms24
AT alvaradojesusm applicationofs1bifactormodeltoevaluatethestructuralvalidityoftmms24
AT sastresantiago applicationofs1bifactormodeltoevaluatethestructuralvalidityoftmms24
AT azanedocarolinam applicationofs1bifactormodeltoevaluatethestructuralvalidityoftmms24