Cargando…

The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers

Background: Digital rectal examination (DRE) is considered an important part of the physical examination. However, it is unclear how many patients have a DRE performed at the primary care level in the work-up of rectal cancer, and if the absence of a DRE causes a delay to consultation with a special...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farooq, Omar, Farooq, Ameer, Ghosh, Sunita, Qadri, Raza, Steed, Tanner, Quinton, Mitch, Usmani, Nawaid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34356233
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9070855
_version_ 1783727716665655296
author Farooq, Omar
Farooq, Ameer
Ghosh, Sunita
Qadri, Raza
Steed, Tanner
Quinton, Mitch
Usmani, Nawaid
author_facet Farooq, Omar
Farooq, Ameer
Ghosh, Sunita
Qadri, Raza
Steed, Tanner
Quinton, Mitch
Usmani, Nawaid
author_sort Farooq, Omar
collection PubMed
description Background: Digital rectal examination (DRE) is considered an important part of the physical examination. However, it is unclear how many patients have a DRE performed at the primary care level in the work-up of rectal cancer, and if the absence of a DRE causes a delay to consultation with a specialist. Methods: A retrospective patient questionnaire was sent to 1000 consecutive patients with stage II or stage III rectal cancer. The questionnaire asked patients to recall if they had a DRE performed by their general practitioner (GP) when they first presented with symptoms or a positive FIT test. Demographic data, staging data, and time to consultation with a specialist were also collected. Results: A thousand surveys were mailed out, and a total of 262 patients responded. Of the respondents, 46.2% did not recall undergoing a digital rectal examination by their primary care provider. Women were less likely to undergo a DRE than men (28.6% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.019). While there was a trend towards longer times to specialist consultation in patients who did not undergo a DRE (27.0 vs. 12.2 weeks), this was not statistically significant (p = 0.121). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients who are FIT positive or have symptomatic rectal bleeding do not recall having a DRE by their primary care provider. Barriers may include lack of comfort with performing DRE or lack of time. Clearer guidelines and more support for GP’s may increase uptake of DRE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8306048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83060482021-07-25 The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers Farooq, Omar Farooq, Ameer Ghosh, Sunita Qadri, Raza Steed, Tanner Quinton, Mitch Usmani, Nawaid Healthcare (Basel) Article Background: Digital rectal examination (DRE) is considered an important part of the physical examination. However, it is unclear how many patients have a DRE performed at the primary care level in the work-up of rectal cancer, and if the absence of a DRE causes a delay to consultation with a specialist. Methods: A retrospective patient questionnaire was sent to 1000 consecutive patients with stage II or stage III rectal cancer. The questionnaire asked patients to recall if they had a DRE performed by their general practitioner (GP) when they first presented with symptoms or a positive FIT test. Demographic data, staging data, and time to consultation with a specialist were also collected. Results: A thousand surveys were mailed out, and a total of 262 patients responded. Of the respondents, 46.2% did not recall undergoing a digital rectal examination by their primary care provider. Women were less likely to undergo a DRE than men (28.6% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.019). While there was a trend towards longer times to specialist consultation in patients who did not undergo a DRE (27.0 vs. 12.2 weeks), this was not statistically significant (p = 0.121). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients who are FIT positive or have symptomatic rectal bleeding do not recall having a DRE by their primary care provider. Barriers may include lack of comfort with performing DRE or lack of time. Clearer guidelines and more support for GP’s may increase uptake of DRE. MDPI 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8306048/ /pubmed/34356233 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9070855 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Farooq, Omar
Farooq, Ameer
Ghosh, Sunita
Qadri, Raza
Steed, Tanner
Quinton, Mitch
Usmani, Nawaid
The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers
title The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers
title_full The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers
title_fullStr The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers
title_full_unstemmed The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers
title_short The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers
title_sort digital divide: a retrospective survey of digital rectal examinations during the workup of rectal cancers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34356233
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9070855
work_keys_str_mv AT farooqomar thedigitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT farooqameer thedigitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT ghoshsunita thedigitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT qadriraza thedigitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT steedtanner thedigitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT quintonmitch thedigitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT usmaninawaid thedigitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT farooqomar digitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT farooqameer digitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT ghoshsunita digitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT qadriraza digitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT steedtanner digitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT quintonmitch digitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers
AT usmaninawaid digitaldividearetrospectivesurveyofdigitalrectalexaminationsduringtheworkupofrectalcancers