Cargando…

How Have Researchers Acknowledged and Controlled for Academic Work Activity When Measuring Medical Students’ Internet Addiction? A Systematic Literature Review

Internationally, medical students’ Internet Addiction (IA) is widely studied. As medical students use the Internet extensively for work, we asked how researchers control for work-related Internet activity, and the extent to which this influences interpretations of “addiction” rates. A search of PubM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masters, Ken, Loda, Teresa, Tervooren, Finja, Herrmann-Werner, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147681
_version_ 1783727795218677760
author Masters, Ken
Loda, Teresa
Tervooren, Finja
Herrmann-Werner, Anne
author_facet Masters, Ken
Loda, Teresa
Tervooren, Finja
Herrmann-Werner, Anne
author_sort Masters, Ken
collection PubMed
description Internationally, medical students’ Internet Addiction (IA) is widely studied. As medical students use the Internet extensively for work, we asked how researchers control for work-related Internet activity, and the extent to which this influences interpretations of “addiction” rates. A search of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted on the search phrase of “medical students” and “internet addiction” in March 2020. In total, 98 studies met our criteria, 88 (90%) used Young’s Internet Addiction Test, and the studies’ IA rates ranged widely. Little note was taken of work-related activity, and, when discussed, had little to no impact on the interpretation of Internet “addiction”. Studies seldom accounted for work-related activities, researcher bias appears to influence their position, “usage” appears conflated with “addiction”, and correlations between “addiction” and negative behaviours are frequently confused with one-way causation. In spite of IA’s not being officially recognised, few researchers questioned its validity. While IA may exist among medical students, its measurement is flawed; given the use of the Internet as a crucial medical education tool, there is the risk that conscientious students will be labelled “addicted”, and poor academic performance may be attributed to this “addiction”.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8306379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83063792021-07-25 How Have Researchers Acknowledged and Controlled for Academic Work Activity When Measuring Medical Students’ Internet Addiction? A Systematic Literature Review Masters, Ken Loda, Teresa Tervooren, Finja Herrmann-Werner, Anne Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Internationally, medical students’ Internet Addiction (IA) is widely studied. As medical students use the Internet extensively for work, we asked how researchers control for work-related Internet activity, and the extent to which this influences interpretations of “addiction” rates. A search of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted on the search phrase of “medical students” and “internet addiction” in March 2020. In total, 98 studies met our criteria, 88 (90%) used Young’s Internet Addiction Test, and the studies’ IA rates ranged widely. Little note was taken of work-related activity, and, when discussed, had little to no impact on the interpretation of Internet “addiction”. Studies seldom accounted for work-related activities, researcher bias appears to influence their position, “usage” appears conflated with “addiction”, and correlations between “addiction” and negative behaviours are frequently confused with one-way causation. In spite of IA’s not being officially recognised, few researchers questioned its validity. While IA may exist among medical students, its measurement is flawed; given the use of the Internet as a crucial medical education tool, there is the risk that conscientious students will be labelled “addicted”, and poor academic performance may be attributed to this “addiction”. MDPI 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8306379/ /pubmed/34300132 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147681 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Masters, Ken
Loda, Teresa
Tervooren, Finja
Herrmann-Werner, Anne
How Have Researchers Acknowledged and Controlled for Academic Work Activity When Measuring Medical Students’ Internet Addiction? A Systematic Literature Review
title How Have Researchers Acknowledged and Controlled for Academic Work Activity When Measuring Medical Students’ Internet Addiction? A Systematic Literature Review
title_full How Have Researchers Acknowledged and Controlled for Academic Work Activity When Measuring Medical Students’ Internet Addiction? A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr How Have Researchers Acknowledged and Controlled for Academic Work Activity When Measuring Medical Students’ Internet Addiction? A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed How Have Researchers Acknowledged and Controlled for Academic Work Activity When Measuring Medical Students’ Internet Addiction? A Systematic Literature Review
title_short How Have Researchers Acknowledged and Controlled for Academic Work Activity When Measuring Medical Students’ Internet Addiction? A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort how have researchers acknowledged and controlled for academic work activity when measuring medical students’ internet addiction? a systematic literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147681
work_keys_str_mv AT mastersken howhaveresearchersacknowledgedandcontrolledforacademicworkactivitywhenmeasuringmedicalstudentsinternetaddictionasystematicliteraturereview
AT lodateresa howhaveresearchersacknowledgedandcontrolledforacademicworkactivitywhenmeasuringmedicalstudentsinternetaddictionasystematicliteraturereview
AT tervoorenfinja howhaveresearchersacknowledgedandcontrolledforacademicworkactivitywhenmeasuringmedicalstudentsinternetaddictionasystematicliteraturereview
AT herrmannwerneranne howhaveresearchersacknowledgedandcontrolledforacademicworkactivitywhenmeasuringmedicalstudentsinternetaddictionasystematicliteraturereview