Cargando…

Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments

Gingivafibroblasts were cultured on lithium disilicate, on zirconia dioxide, and on titanium with two different surface roughnesses (0.2 µm and 0.07 µm); Proliferation (MTT), Living/Dead staining, cytotoxicity (LDH), proliferation (FGF2), and inflammation (TNFα) were analyzed after 1 day and 21 days...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Susanne, Moser, Marco Maria, Kleinheinz, Johannes, Happe, Arndt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299319
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147700
_version_ 1783727812612456448
author Jung, Susanne
Moser, Marco Maria
Kleinheinz, Johannes
Happe, Arndt
author_facet Jung, Susanne
Moser, Marco Maria
Kleinheinz, Johannes
Happe, Arndt
author_sort Jung, Susanne
collection PubMed
description Gingivafibroblasts were cultured on lithium disilicate, on zirconia dioxide, and on titanium with two different surface roughnesses (0.2 µm and 0.07 µm); Proliferation (MTT), Living/Dead staining, cytotoxicity (LDH), proliferation (FGF2), and inflammation (TNFα) were analyzed after 1 day and 21 days. Furthermore, alteration in cell morphology (SEM) was analyzed. The statistical analysis was performed by a Kruskal–Wallis test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. There were no distinct differences in cellular behavior between the tested roughness. There were slight differences between tested materials. Cells grown on zirconia dioxide showed higher cytotoxic effects. Cells grown on lithium disilicate showed less expression of TNFα compared to those grown on zirconia dioxide or titanium. These effects persisted only during the first time span. The results indicate that the two tested high-strength ceramics and surface properties are biologically suitable for transmucosal implant components. The findings may help clinicians to choose the most appropriate biomaterial as well as the most appropriate surface treatment to use in accordance with specific clinical dental applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8306444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83064442021-07-25 Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments Jung, Susanne Moser, Marco Maria Kleinheinz, Johannes Happe, Arndt Int J Mol Sci Article Gingivafibroblasts were cultured on lithium disilicate, on zirconia dioxide, and on titanium with two different surface roughnesses (0.2 µm and 0.07 µm); Proliferation (MTT), Living/Dead staining, cytotoxicity (LDH), proliferation (FGF2), and inflammation (TNFα) were analyzed after 1 day and 21 days. Furthermore, alteration in cell morphology (SEM) was analyzed. The statistical analysis was performed by a Kruskal–Wallis test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. There were no distinct differences in cellular behavior between the tested roughness. There were slight differences between tested materials. Cells grown on zirconia dioxide showed higher cytotoxic effects. Cells grown on lithium disilicate showed less expression of TNFα compared to those grown on zirconia dioxide or titanium. These effects persisted only during the first time span. The results indicate that the two tested high-strength ceramics and surface properties are biologically suitable for transmucosal implant components. The findings may help clinicians to choose the most appropriate biomaterial as well as the most appropriate surface treatment to use in accordance with specific clinical dental applications. MDPI 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8306444/ /pubmed/34299319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147700 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jung, Susanne
Moser, Marco Maria
Kleinheinz, Johannes
Happe, Arndt
Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments
title Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments
title_full Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments
title_fullStr Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments
title_short Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments
title_sort biocompatibility of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics with different surface topographies for dental implant abutments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299319
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147700
work_keys_str_mv AT jungsusanne biocompatibilityoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicswithdifferentsurfacetopographiesfordentalimplantabutments
AT mosermarcomaria biocompatibilityoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicswithdifferentsurfacetopographiesfordentalimplantabutments
AT kleinheinzjohannes biocompatibilityoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicswithdifferentsurfacetopographiesfordentalimplantabutments
AT happearndt biocompatibilityoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicswithdifferentsurfacetopographiesfordentalimplantabutments