Cargando…
Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments
Gingivafibroblasts were cultured on lithium disilicate, on zirconia dioxide, and on titanium with two different surface roughnesses (0.2 µm and 0.07 µm); Proliferation (MTT), Living/Dead staining, cytotoxicity (LDH), proliferation (FGF2), and inflammation (TNFα) were analyzed after 1 day and 21 days...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147700 |
_version_ | 1783727812612456448 |
---|---|
author | Jung, Susanne Moser, Marco Maria Kleinheinz, Johannes Happe, Arndt |
author_facet | Jung, Susanne Moser, Marco Maria Kleinheinz, Johannes Happe, Arndt |
author_sort | Jung, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gingivafibroblasts were cultured on lithium disilicate, on zirconia dioxide, and on titanium with two different surface roughnesses (0.2 µm and 0.07 µm); Proliferation (MTT), Living/Dead staining, cytotoxicity (LDH), proliferation (FGF2), and inflammation (TNFα) were analyzed after 1 day and 21 days. Furthermore, alteration in cell morphology (SEM) was analyzed. The statistical analysis was performed by a Kruskal–Wallis test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. There were no distinct differences in cellular behavior between the tested roughness. There were slight differences between tested materials. Cells grown on zirconia dioxide showed higher cytotoxic effects. Cells grown on lithium disilicate showed less expression of TNFα compared to those grown on zirconia dioxide or titanium. These effects persisted only during the first time span. The results indicate that the two tested high-strength ceramics and surface properties are biologically suitable for transmucosal implant components. The findings may help clinicians to choose the most appropriate biomaterial as well as the most appropriate surface treatment to use in accordance with specific clinical dental applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8306444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83064442021-07-25 Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments Jung, Susanne Moser, Marco Maria Kleinheinz, Johannes Happe, Arndt Int J Mol Sci Article Gingivafibroblasts were cultured on lithium disilicate, on zirconia dioxide, and on titanium with two different surface roughnesses (0.2 µm and 0.07 µm); Proliferation (MTT), Living/Dead staining, cytotoxicity (LDH), proliferation (FGF2), and inflammation (TNFα) were analyzed after 1 day and 21 days. Furthermore, alteration in cell morphology (SEM) was analyzed. The statistical analysis was performed by a Kruskal–Wallis test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. There were no distinct differences in cellular behavior between the tested roughness. There were slight differences between tested materials. Cells grown on zirconia dioxide showed higher cytotoxic effects. Cells grown on lithium disilicate showed less expression of TNFα compared to those grown on zirconia dioxide or titanium. These effects persisted only during the first time span. The results indicate that the two tested high-strength ceramics and surface properties are biologically suitable for transmucosal implant components. The findings may help clinicians to choose the most appropriate biomaterial as well as the most appropriate surface treatment to use in accordance with specific clinical dental applications. MDPI 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8306444/ /pubmed/34299319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147700 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jung, Susanne Moser, Marco Maria Kleinheinz, Johannes Happe, Arndt Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments |
title | Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments |
title_full | Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments |
title_fullStr | Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments |
title_full_unstemmed | Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments |
title_short | Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments |
title_sort | biocompatibility of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics with different surface topographies for dental implant abutments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jungsusanne biocompatibilityoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicswithdifferentsurfacetopographiesfordentalimplantabutments AT mosermarcomaria biocompatibilityoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicswithdifferentsurfacetopographiesfordentalimplantabutments AT kleinheinzjohannes biocompatibilityoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicswithdifferentsurfacetopographiesfordentalimplantabutments AT happearndt biocompatibilityoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicswithdifferentsurfacetopographiesfordentalimplantabutments |