Cargando…
How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing
The aim of this investigation was to compare microbiological analyses of 100 computed tomography-guided drainages from infectious foci (thoracic, abdominal, musculoskeletal), transported and analyzed by two widely established techniques, that are (i) sterile vials or (ii) inoculated blood culture bo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071510 |
_version_ | 1783727826570051584 |
---|---|
author | Skusa, Romy Skusa, Christopher Wohlfarth, Moritz Hahn, Andreas Frickmann, Hagen Weber, Marc-André Podbielski, Andreas Warnke, Philipp |
author_facet | Skusa, Romy Skusa, Christopher Wohlfarth, Moritz Hahn, Andreas Frickmann, Hagen Weber, Marc-André Podbielski, Andreas Warnke, Philipp |
author_sort | Skusa, Romy |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this investigation was to compare microbiological analyses of 100 computed tomography-guided drainages from infectious foci (thoracic, abdominal, musculoskeletal), transported and analyzed by two widely established techniques, that are (i) sterile vials or (ii) inoculated blood culture bottles. The mean number of detected microorganisms from blood culture (aerobic/anaerobic) or conventional method (sterile vial, solid and broth media) per specimen were comparable with 1.29 and 1.41, respectively (p = 1.0). The conventional method showed a trend towards shorter time-to-result (median 28.62 h) in comparison to blood culture incubation (median 43.55 h) (p = 0.0722). Of note, detection of anaerobes (13% vs. 36%) and the number of detected microorganisms in polymicrobial infections (2.76 vs. 3.26) differed significantly with an advantage towards conventional techniques (p = 0.0015; p = 0.035), especially in abdominal aspirations. Despite substantially overlapping results from both techniques, the conventional approach includes some benefits which justify its role as standard approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8306503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83065032021-07-25 How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing Skusa, Romy Skusa, Christopher Wohlfarth, Moritz Hahn, Andreas Frickmann, Hagen Weber, Marc-André Podbielski, Andreas Warnke, Philipp Microorganisms Article The aim of this investigation was to compare microbiological analyses of 100 computed tomography-guided drainages from infectious foci (thoracic, abdominal, musculoskeletal), transported and analyzed by two widely established techniques, that are (i) sterile vials or (ii) inoculated blood culture bottles. The mean number of detected microorganisms from blood culture (aerobic/anaerobic) or conventional method (sterile vial, solid and broth media) per specimen were comparable with 1.29 and 1.41, respectively (p = 1.0). The conventional method showed a trend towards shorter time-to-result (median 28.62 h) in comparison to blood culture incubation (median 43.55 h) (p = 0.0722). Of note, detection of anaerobes (13% vs. 36%) and the number of detected microorganisms in polymicrobial infections (2.76 vs. 3.26) differed significantly with an advantage towards conventional techniques (p = 0.0015; p = 0.035), especially in abdominal aspirations. Despite substantially overlapping results from both techniques, the conventional approach includes some benefits which justify its role as standard approach. MDPI 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8306503/ /pubmed/34361944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071510 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Skusa, Romy Skusa, Christopher Wohlfarth, Moritz Hahn, Andreas Frickmann, Hagen Weber, Marc-André Podbielski, Andreas Warnke, Philipp How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing |
title | How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing |
title_full | How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing |
title_fullStr | How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing |
title_short | How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing |
title_sort | how to handle ct-guided abscess drainages in microbiological analyses? sterile vials vs. blood culture bottles for transport and processing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skusaromy howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing AT skusachristopher howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing AT wohlfarthmoritz howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing AT hahnandreas howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing AT frickmannhagen howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing AT webermarcandre howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing AT podbielskiandreas howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing AT warnkephilipp howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing |