Cargando…

How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing

The aim of this investigation was to compare microbiological analyses of 100 computed tomography-guided drainages from infectious foci (thoracic, abdominal, musculoskeletal), transported and analyzed by two widely established techniques, that are (i) sterile vials or (ii) inoculated blood culture bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skusa, Romy, Skusa, Christopher, Wohlfarth, Moritz, Hahn, Andreas, Frickmann, Hagen, Weber, Marc-André, Podbielski, Andreas, Warnke, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071510
_version_ 1783727826570051584
author Skusa, Romy
Skusa, Christopher
Wohlfarth, Moritz
Hahn, Andreas
Frickmann, Hagen
Weber, Marc-André
Podbielski, Andreas
Warnke, Philipp
author_facet Skusa, Romy
Skusa, Christopher
Wohlfarth, Moritz
Hahn, Andreas
Frickmann, Hagen
Weber, Marc-André
Podbielski, Andreas
Warnke, Philipp
author_sort Skusa, Romy
collection PubMed
description The aim of this investigation was to compare microbiological analyses of 100 computed tomography-guided drainages from infectious foci (thoracic, abdominal, musculoskeletal), transported and analyzed by two widely established techniques, that are (i) sterile vials or (ii) inoculated blood culture bottles. The mean number of detected microorganisms from blood culture (aerobic/anaerobic) or conventional method (sterile vial, solid and broth media) per specimen were comparable with 1.29 and 1.41, respectively (p = 1.0). The conventional method showed a trend towards shorter time-to-result (median 28.62 h) in comparison to blood culture incubation (median 43.55 h) (p = 0.0722). Of note, detection of anaerobes (13% vs. 36%) and the number of detected microorganisms in polymicrobial infections (2.76 vs. 3.26) differed significantly with an advantage towards conventional techniques (p = 0.0015; p = 0.035), especially in abdominal aspirations. Despite substantially overlapping results from both techniques, the conventional approach includes some benefits which justify its role as standard approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8306503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83065032021-07-25 How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing Skusa, Romy Skusa, Christopher Wohlfarth, Moritz Hahn, Andreas Frickmann, Hagen Weber, Marc-André Podbielski, Andreas Warnke, Philipp Microorganisms Article The aim of this investigation was to compare microbiological analyses of 100 computed tomography-guided drainages from infectious foci (thoracic, abdominal, musculoskeletal), transported and analyzed by two widely established techniques, that are (i) sterile vials or (ii) inoculated blood culture bottles. The mean number of detected microorganisms from blood culture (aerobic/anaerobic) or conventional method (sterile vial, solid and broth media) per specimen were comparable with 1.29 and 1.41, respectively (p = 1.0). The conventional method showed a trend towards shorter time-to-result (median 28.62 h) in comparison to blood culture incubation (median 43.55 h) (p = 0.0722). Of note, detection of anaerobes (13% vs. 36%) and the number of detected microorganisms in polymicrobial infections (2.76 vs. 3.26) differed significantly with an advantage towards conventional techniques (p = 0.0015; p = 0.035), especially in abdominal aspirations. Despite substantially overlapping results from both techniques, the conventional approach includes some benefits which justify its role as standard approach. MDPI 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8306503/ /pubmed/34361944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071510 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Skusa, Romy
Skusa, Christopher
Wohlfarth, Moritz
Hahn, Andreas
Frickmann, Hagen
Weber, Marc-André
Podbielski, Andreas
Warnke, Philipp
How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing
title How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing
title_full How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing
title_fullStr How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing
title_full_unstemmed How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing
title_short How to Handle CT-Guided Abscess Drainages in Microbiological Analyses? Sterile Vials vs. Blood Culture Bottles for Transport and Processing
title_sort how to handle ct-guided abscess drainages in microbiological analyses? sterile vials vs. blood culture bottles for transport and processing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071510
work_keys_str_mv AT skusaromy howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing
AT skusachristopher howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing
AT wohlfarthmoritz howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing
AT hahnandreas howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing
AT frickmannhagen howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing
AT webermarcandre howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing
AT podbielskiandreas howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing
AT warnkephilipp howtohandlectguidedabscessdrainagesinmicrobiologicalanalysessterilevialsvsbloodculturebottlesfortransportandprocessing