Cargando…

Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is becoming increasingly popular. However, the risk factors for stent migration into the abdominal cavity remain unknown. Methods: Forty-eight patients undergoing EUS-HGS with placement of a long, partially covered self-expandabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ochiai, Kazushige, Fujisawa, Toshio, Ishii, Shigeto, Suzuki, Akinori, Saito, Hiroaki, Takasaki, Yusuke, Ushio, Mako, Takahashi, Sho, Yamagata, Wataru, Tomishima, Ko, Hisamatsu, Tadakazu, Isayama, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143111
_version_ 1783727853892796416
author Ochiai, Kazushige
Fujisawa, Toshio
Ishii, Shigeto
Suzuki, Akinori
Saito, Hiroaki
Takasaki, Yusuke
Ushio, Mako
Takahashi, Sho
Yamagata, Wataru
Tomishima, Ko
Hisamatsu, Tadakazu
Isayama, Hiroyuki
author_facet Ochiai, Kazushige
Fujisawa, Toshio
Ishii, Shigeto
Suzuki, Akinori
Saito, Hiroaki
Takasaki, Yusuke
Ushio, Mako
Takahashi, Sho
Yamagata, Wataru
Tomishima, Ko
Hisamatsu, Tadakazu
Isayama, Hiroyuki
author_sort Ochiai, Kazushige
collection PubMed
description Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is becoming increasingly popular. However, the risk factors for stent migration into the abdominal cavity remain unknown. Methods: Forty-eight patients undergoing EUS-HGS with placement of a long, partially covered self-expandable metallic stent (LPC-SEMS) were studied retrospectively to identify risk factors of stent migration. We determined the technical and functional success rates, and recorded adverse events, including stent migration. Results: EUS-HGS was technically successful in all patients. However, stent migration was evident in five patients (one actual and four imminent, 10%). Stent migration into the abdominal cavity was observed in one patient (2%), and the other four cases required additional procedures to prevent migration (8%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of stent migration increased as the initial (pre-procedure) distance between the stomach and liver at the puncture site increased (p = 0.012). Conclusions: A longer distance between the stomach and liver at the puncture site increased the risk of stent migration. However, during EUS-HGS, it is difficult to adjust the puncture position. It is important to ensure that the proportion of the stent in the stomach is large; the use of a self-anchoring stent may be optimal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8306619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83066192021-07-25 Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy Ochiai, Kazushige Fujisawa, Toshio Ishii, Shigeto Suzuki, Akinori Saito, Hiroaki Takasaki, Yusuke Ushio, Mako Takahashi, Sho Yamagata, Wataru Tomishima, Ko Hisamatsu, Tadakazu Isayama, Hiroyuki J Clin Med Article Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is becoming increasingly popular. However, the risk factors for stent migration into the abdominal cavity remain unknown. Methods: Forty-eight patients undergoing EUS-HGS with placement of a long, partially covered self-expandable metallic stent (LPC-SEMS) were studied retrospectively to identify risk factors of stent migration. We determined the technical and functional success rates, and recorded adverse events, including stent migration. Results: EUS-HGS was technically successful in all patients. However, stent migration was evident in five patients (one actual and four imminent, 10%). Stent migration into the abdominal cavity was observed in one patient (2%), and the other four cases required additional procedures to prevent migration (8%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of stent migration increased as the initial (pre-procedure) distance between the stomach and liver at the puncture site increased (p = 0.012). Conclusions: A longer distance between the stomach and liver at the puncture site increased the risk of stent migration. However, during EUS-HGS, it is difficult to adjust the puncture position. It is important to ensure that the proportion of the stent in the stomach is large; the use of a self-anchoring stent may be optimal. MDPI 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8306619/ /pubmed/34300277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143111 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ochiai, Kazushige
Fujisawa, Toshio
Ishii, Shigeto
Suzuki, Akinori
Saito, Hiroaki
Takasaki, Yusuke
Ushio, Mako
Takahashi, Sho
Yamagata, Wataru
Tomishima, Ko
Hisamatsu, Tadakazu
Isayama, Hiroyuki
Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy
title Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy
title_full Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy
title_fullStr Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy
title_short Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy
title_sort risk factors for stent migration into the abdominal cavity after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143111
work_keys_str_mv AT ochiaikazushige riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT fujisawatoshio riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT ishiishigeto riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT suzukiakinori riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT saitohiroaki riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT takasakiyusuke riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT ushiomako riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT takahashisho riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT yamagatawataru riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT tomishimako riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT hisamatsutadakazu riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT isayamahiroyuki riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy