Cargando…
Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is becoming increasingly popular. However, the risk factors for stent migration into the abdominal cavity remain unknown. Methods: Forty-eight patients undergoing EUS-HGS with placement of a long, partially covered self-expandabl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143111 |
_version_ | 1783727853892796416 |
---|---|
author | Ochiai, Kazushige Fujisawa, Toshio Ishii, Shigeto Suzuki, Akinori Saito, Hiroaki Takasaki, Yusuke Ushio, Mako Takahashi, Sho Yamagata, Wataru Tomishima, Ko Hisamatsu, Tadakazu Isayama, Hiroyuki |
author_facet | Ochiai, Kazushige Fujisawa, Toshio Ishii, Shigeto Suzuki, Akinori Saito, Hiroaki Takasaki, Yusuke Ushio, Mako Takahashi, Sho Yamagata, Wataru Tomishima, Ko Hisamatsu, Tadakazu Isayama, Hiroyuki |
author_sort | Ochiai, Kazushige |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is becoming increasingly popular. However, the risk factors for stent migration into the abdominal cavity remain unknown. Methods: Forty-eight patients undergoing EUS-HGS with placement of a long, partially covered self-expandable metallic stent (LPC-SEMS) were studied retrospectively to identify risk factors of stent migration. We determined the technical and functional success rates, and recorded adverse events, including stent migration. Results: EUS-HGS was technically successful in all patients. However, stent migration was evident in five patients (one actual and four imminent, 10%). Stent migration into the abdominal cavity was observed in one patient (2%), and the other four cases required additional procedures to prevent migration (8%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of stent migration increased as the initial (pre-procedure) distance between the stomach and liver at the puncture site increased (p = 0.012). Conclusions: A longer distance between the stomach and liver at the puncture site increased the risk of stent migration. However, during EUS-HGS, it is difficult to adjust the puncture position. It is important to ensure that the proportion of the stent in the stomach is large; the use of a self-anchoring stent may be optimal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8306619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83066192021-07-25 Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy Ochiai, Kazushige Fujisawa, Toshio Ishii, Shigeto Suzuki, Akinori Saito, Hiroaki Takasaki, Yusuke Ushio, Mako Takahashi, Sho Yamagata, Wataru Tomishima, Ko Hisamatsu, Tadakazu Isayama, Hiroyuki J Clin Med Article Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is becoming increasingly popular. However, the risk factors for stent migration into the abdominal cavity remain unknown. Methods: Forty-eight patients undergoing EUS-HGS with placement of a long, partially covered self-expandable metallic stent (LPC-SEMS) were studied retrospectively to identify risk factors of stent migration. We determined the technical and functional success rates, and recorded adverse events, including stent migration. Results: EUS-HGS was technically successful in all patients. However, stent migration was evident in five patients (one actual and four imminent, 10%). Stent migration into the abdominal cavity was observed in one patient (2%), and the other four cases required additional procedures to prevent migration (8%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of stent migration increased as the initial (pre-procedure) distance between the stomach and liver at the puncture site increased (p = 0.012). Conclusions: A longer distance between the stomach and liver at the puncture site increased the risk of stent migration. However, during EUS-HGS, it is difficult to adjust the puncture position. It is important to ensure that the proportion of the stent in the stomach is large; the use of a self-anchoring stent may be optimal. MDPI 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8306619/ /pubmed/34300277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143111 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ochiai, Kazushige Fujisawa, Toshio Ishii, Shigeto Suzuki, Akinori Saito, Hiroaki Takasaki, Yusuke Ushio, Mako Takahashi, Sho Yamagata, Wataru Tomishima, Ko Hisamatsu, Tadakazu Isayama, Hiroyuki Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy |
title | Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy |
title_full | Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy |
title_fullStr | Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy |
title_short | Risk Factors for Stent Migration into the Abdominal Cavity after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy |
title_sort | risk factors for stent migration into the abdominal cavity after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ochiaikazushige riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT fujisawatoshio riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT ishiishigeto riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT suzukiakinori riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT saitohiroaki riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT takasakiyusuke riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT ushiomako riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT takahashisho riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT yamagatawataru riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT tomishimako riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT hisamatsutadakazu riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT isayamahiroyuki riskfactorsforstentmigrationintotheabdominalcavityafterendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy |