Cargando…

Patient–Caregiver Treatment Preference Discordance and Its Association With Caregiving Burden and Esteem

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many patient–caregiver dyads report conflicting treatment decisions regarding preferences for life extension treatments and symptom management. It is possible that this discordance will lead to negative psychological outcomes including lowered caregiving esteem and increas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozdemir, Semra, Ng, Sean, Malhotra, Chetna, Teo, Irene, Finkelstein, Eric A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34316519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab020
_version_ 1783727879147749376
author Ozdemir, Semra
Ng, Sean
Malhotra, Chetna
Teo, Irene
Finkelstein, Eric A
author_facet Ozdemir, Semra
Ng, Sean
Malhotra, Chetna
Teo, Irene
Finkelstein, Eric A
author_sort Ozdemir, Semra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many patient–caregiver dyads report conflicting treatment decisions regarding preferences for life extension treatments and symptom management. It is possible that this discordance will lead to negative psychological outcomes including lowered caregiving esteem and increased caregiver burden. However, the relationships between treatment discordance among dyads and caregiver psychological outcomes are not well studied among advanced cancer patients—a gap this study aims to fill. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Outcome variables included caregiver burden and caregiving esteem, measured via a modified 4-domain Caregiver Reaction Assessment Scale. The main independent variable was patient–caregiver treatment preference discordance, examined using questions adapted from an existing protocol. Analyses were conducted using multivariable regressions. RESULTS: A convenience sample of 285 patient–caregiver dyads were recruited from outpatient clinics at 2 tertiary hospitals in Singapore. The majority (60%) of patient–caregiver dyads reported discordant treatment preferences. Discordance in this study arose because caregivers wanted a balance between life extension and symptom management while patients preferred life-extending treatment. In multivariable analyses, discordance predicted caregiver burden arising from impact on caregiver schedule and health (β = 0.16, p = .07) and lack of family support (β = 0.13, p = .04). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Theoretically, this study provided a more nuanced understanding of how dyad discordance may worsen the burdens felt by caregivers, and which aspects of their lives (i.e., burden due to impact of caregiver schedule and health and lack of family support) are most affected. Our findings can aid in establishing therapeutic interventions targeted toward improving communication skills and encouraging end-of-life discussions among patients, caregivers, and their health care providers. The importance of establishing and improving therapy programs specifically targeted toward caregivers was also underlined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8306724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83067242021-07-26 Patient–Caregiver Treatment Preference Discordance and Its Association With Caregiving Burden and Esteem Ozdemir, Semra Ng, Sean Malhotra, Chetna Teo, Irene Finkelstein, Eric A Innov Aging Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many patient–caregiver dyads report conflicting treatment decisions regarding preferences for life extension treatments and symptom management. It is possible that this discordance will lead to negative psychological outcomes including lowered caregiving esteem and increased caregiver burden. However, the relationships between treatment discordance among dyads and caregiver psychological outcomes are not well studied among advanced cancer patients—a gap this study aims to fill. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Outcome variables included caregiver burden and caregiving esteem, measured via a modified 4-domain Caregiver Reaction Assessment Scale. The main independent variable was patient–caregiver treatment preference discordance, examined using questions adapted from an existing protocol. Analyses were conducted using multivariable regressions. RESULTS: A convenience sample of 285 patient–caregiver dyads were recruited from outpatient clinics at 2 tertiary hospitals in Singapore. The majority (60%) of patient–caregiver dyads reported discordant treatment preferences. Discordance in this study arose because caregivers wanted a balance between life extension and symptom management while patients preferred life-extending treatment. In multivariable analyses, discordance predicted caregiver burden arising from impact on caregiver schedule and health (β = 0.16, p = .07) and lack of family support (β = 0.13, p = .04). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Theoretically, this study provided a more nuanced understanding of how dyad discordance may worsen the burdens felt by caregivers, and which aspects of their lives (i.e., burden due to impact of caregiver schedule and health and lack of family support) are most affected. Our findings can aid in establishing therapeutic interventions targeted toward improving communication skills and encouraging end-of-life discussions among patients, caregivers, and their health care providers. The importance of establishing and improving therapy programs specifically targeted toward caregivers was also underlined. Oxford University Press 2021-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8306724/ /pubmed/34316519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab020 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Ozdemir, Semra
Ng, Sean
Malhotra, Chetna
Teo, Irene
Finkelstein, Eric A
Patient–Caregiver Treatment Preference Discordance and Its Association With Caregiving Burden and Esteem
title Patient–Caregiver Treatment Preference Discordance and Its Association With Caregiving Burden and Esteem
title_full Patient–Caregiver Treatment Preference Discordance and Its Association With Caregiving Burden and Esteem
title_fullStr Patient–Caregiver Treatment Preference Discordance and Its Association With Caregiving Burden and Esteem
title_full_unstemmed Patient–Caregiver Treatment Preference Discordance and Its Association With Caregiving Burden and Esteem
title_short Patient–Caregiver Treatment Preference Discordance and Its Association With Caregiving Burden and Esteem
title_sort patient–caregiver treatment preference discordance and its association with caregiving burden and esteem
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34316519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab020
work_keys_str_mv AT ozdemirsemra patientcaregivertreatmentpreferencediscordanceanditsassociationwithcaregivingburdenandesteem
AT ngsean patientcaregivertreatmentpreferencediscordanceanditsassociationwithcaregivingburdenandesteem
AT malhotrachetna patientcaregivertreatmentpreferencediscordanceanditsassociationwithcaregivingburdenandesteem
AT teoirene patientcaregivertreatmentpreferencediscordanceanditsassociationwithcaregivingburdenandesteem
AT finkelsteinerica patientcaregivertreatmentpreferencediscordanceanditsassociationwithcaregivingburdenandesteem
AT patientcaregivertreatmentpreferencediscordanceanditsassociationwithcaregivingburdenandesteem