Cargando…

Differential Factors for Predicting Outcomes in Left Main versus Non-Left Main Coronary Bifurcation Stenting

Background: No large-scale study has compared the clinical and angiographic predictors of cardiovascular events in patients with left main bifurcation (LMB) and non-LMB stenting after second-generation DES implantation. Herein, we investigated differential clinical and angiographic factors for predi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cha, Jung-Joon, Hong, Soon Jun, Joo, Hyung Joon, Park, Jae Hyoung, Yu, Cheol Woong, Ahn, Tae Hoon, Kim, Hyo-Soo, Chun, Woo Jung, Hur, Seung-Ho, Han, Seung Hwan, Rha, Seung-Woon, Chae, In-Ho, Jeong, Jin-Ok, Heo, Jung Ho, Yoon, Junghan, Choi, Ki Hong, Song, Young Bin, Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol, Park, Jong-Seon, Hong, Myeong-Ki, Doh, Joon-Hyung, Cha, Kwang Soo, Kim, Doo-Il, Lee, Sang Yeub, Chang, Kiyuk, Hwang, Byung-Hee, Choi, So-Yeon, Jeong, Myung Ho, Nam, Chang-Wook, Koo, Bon-Kwon, Lim, Do-Sun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300190
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143024
Descripción
Sumario:Background: No large-scale study has compared the clinical and angiographic predictors of cardiovascular events in patients with left main bifurcation (LMB) and non-LMB stenting after second-generation DES implantation. Herein, we investigated differential clinical and angiographic factors for predicting outcomes in LMB versus non-LMB stenting. Methods: A total of 2648 patients with bifurcation lesions treated with second-generation DESs from the retrospective patient cohort were divided into an LMB group (n = 935) and a non-LMB group (n = 1713). The primary outcome was the 7-year incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. Results: The incidence of TLF was 9.8%. Those in the LMB group were associated with a higher risk of TLF (14.2% versus 7.5%, p < 0.001) than those in the non-LMB group. Regarding the LMB group, independent predictors of TLF were chronic kidney disease (CKD), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and two-stenting. Regarding the non-LMB group, CKD, reduced LVEF, old age, diabetes, and small diameter of the main vessel stent were independent predictors of TLF. Conclusions: The two-stent strategy could potentially increase TLF for the LMB lesions, and achieving the maximal diameter of the main vessel stent could result in better clinical outcomes for non-LMB lesions.