Cargando…

The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach

Research suggests that physical education (PE) teachers can play a crucial role in the promotion of students’ physical activity. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, this study investigated how students’ perceptions of PE teachers (de-)motivating style relate to students’ device-based physical act...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Doren, Nele, De Cocker, Katrien, De Clerck, Tom, Vangilbergen, Arwen, Vanderlinde, Ruben, Haerens, Leen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8307004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299907
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147457
_version_ 1783727947168874496
author Van Doren, Nele
De Cocker, Katrien
De Clerck, Tom
Vangilbergen, Arwen
Vanderlinde, Ruben
Haerens, Leen
author_facet Van Doren, Nele
De Cocker, Katrien
De Clerck, Tom
Vangilbergen, Arwen
Vanderlinde, Ruben
Haerens, Leen
author_sort Van Doren, Nele
collection PubMed
description Research suggests that physical education (PE) teachers can play a crucial role in the promotion of students’ physical activity. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, this study investigated how students’ perceptions of PE teachers (de-)motivating style relate to students’ device-based physical activity levels during PE. Moreover, it was examined whether students’ motivation plays an intervening role in this relation and whether students’ physical activity differs according to their gender and lesson topic. A sample of 302 secondary school students aged between 11 and 16 years (M = 13.05, SD = 1.04) completed a questionnaire assessing their perceptions of teachers’ (de-)motivating style and their personal motivation toward PE. Students also wore ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers during the PE lesson. Multilevel structural equation modeling revealed that the teachers’ motivating style had a significant positive relation with students’ autonomous motivation, both at the student level and the class level, and teachers’ controlling style had a significant positive relation with students’ controlled motivation and amotivation at both levels. However, in terms of students’ physical activity levels, students’ gender, the lesson topic, and teachers’ controlling style seemed to be more decisive than students’ motivation and teachers’ motivating style.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8307004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83070042021-07-25 The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach Van Doren, Nele De Cocker, Katrien De Clerck, Tom Vangilbergen, Arwen Vanderlinde, Ruben Haerens, Leen Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Research suggests that physical education (PE) teachers can play a crucial role in the promotion of students’ physical activity. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, this study investigated how students’ perceptions of PE teachers (de-)motivating style relate to students’ device-based physical activity levels during PE. Moreover, it was examined whether students’ motivation plays an intervening role in this relation and whether students’ physical activity differs according to their gender and lesson topic. A sample of 302 secondary school students aged between 11 and 16 years (M = 13.05, SD = 1.04) completed a questionnaire assessing their perceptions of teachers’ (de-)motivating style and their personal motivation toward PE. Students also wore ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers during the PE lesson. Multilevel structural equation modeling revealed that the teachers’ motivating style had a significant positive relation with students’ autonomous motivation, both at the student level and the class level, and teachers’ controlling style had a significant positive relation with students’ controlled motivation and amotivation at both levels. However, in terms of students’ physical activity levels, students’ gender, the lesson topic, and teachers’ controlling style seemed to be more decisive than students’ motivation and teachers’ motivating style. MDPI 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8307004/ /pubmed/34299907 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147457 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Van Doren, Nele
De Cocker, Katrien
De Clerck, Tom
Vangilbergen, Arwen
Vanderlinde, Ruben
Haerens, Leen
The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach
title The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach
title_full The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach
title_fullStr The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach
title_full_unstemmed The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach
title_short The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach
title_sort relation between physical education teachers’ (de-)motivating style, students’ motivation, and students’ physical activity: a multilevel approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8307004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299907
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147457
work_keys_str_mv AT vandorennele therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach
AT decockerkatrien therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach
AT declercktom therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach
AT vangilbergenarwen therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach
AT vanderlinderuben therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach
AT haerensleen therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach
AT vandorennele relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach
AT decockerkatrien relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach
AT declercktom relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach
AT vangilbergenarwen relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach
AT vanderlinderuben relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach
AT haerensleen relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach