Cargando…
The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach
Research suggests that physical education (PE) teachers can play a crucial role in the promotion of students’ physical activity. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, this study investigated how students’ perceptions of PE teachers (de-)motivating style relate to students’ device-based physical act...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8307004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299907 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147457 |
_version_ | 1783727947168874496 |
---|---|
author | Van Doren, Nele De Cocker, Katrien De Clerck, Tom Vangilbergen, Arwen Vanderlinde, Ruben Haerens, Leen |
author_facet | Van Doren, Nele De Cocker, Katrien De Clerck, Tom Vangilbergen, Arwen Vanderlinde, Ruben Haerens, Leen |
author_sort | Van Doren, Nele |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research suggests that physical education (PE) teachers can play a crucial role in the promotion of students’ physical activity. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, this study investigated how students’ perceptions of PE teachers (de-)motivating style relate to students’ device-based physical activity levels during PE. Moreover, it was examined whether students’ motivation plays an intervening role in this relation and whether students’ physical activity differs according to their gender and lesson topic. A sample of 302 secondary school students aged between 11 and 16 years (M = 13.05, SD = 1.04) completed a questionnaire assessing their perceptions of teachers’ (de-)motivating style and their personal motivation toward PE. Students also wore ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers during the PE lesson. Multilevel structural equation modeling revealed that the teachers’ motivating style had a significant positive relation with students’ autonomous motivation, both at the student level and the class level, and teachers’ controlling style had a significant positive relation with students’ controlled motivation and amotivation at both levels. However, in terms of students’ physical activity levels, students’ gender, the lesson topic, and teachers’ controlling style seemed to be more decisive than students’ motivation and teachers’ motivating style. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8307004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83070042021-07-25 The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach Van Doren, Nele De Cocker, Katrien De Clerck, Tom Vangilbergen, Arwen Vanderlinde, Ruben Haerens, Leen Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Research suggests that physical education (PE) teachers can play a crucial role in the promotion of students’ physical activity. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, this study investigated how students’ perceptions of PE teachers (de-)motivating style relate to students’ device-based physical activity levels during PE. Moreover, it was examined whether students’ motivation plays an intervening role in this relation and whether students’ physical activity differs according to their gender and lesson topic. A sample of 302 secondary school students aged between 11 and 16 years (M = 13.05, SD = 1.04) completed a questionnaire assessing their perceptions of teachers’ (de-)motivating style and their personal motivation toward PE. Students also wore ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers during the PE lesson. Multilevel structural equation modeling revealed that the teachers’ motivating style had a significant positive relation with students’ autonomous motivation, both at the student level and the class level, and teachers’ controlling style had a significant positive relation with students’ controlled motivation and amotivation at both levels. However, in terms of students’ physical activity levels, students’ gender, the lesson topic, and teachers’ controlling style seemed to be more decisive than students’ motivation and teachers’ motivating style. MDPI 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8307004/ /pubmed/34299907 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147457 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Van Doren, Nele De Cocker, Katrien De Clerck, Tom Vangilbergen, Arwen Vanderlinde, Ruben Haerens, Leen The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach |
title | The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach |
title_full | The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach |
title_fullStr | The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach |
title_short | The Relation between Physical Education Teachers’ (De-)Motivating Style, Students’ Motivation, and Students’ Physical Activity: A Multilevel Approach |
title_sort | relation between physical education teachers’ (de-)motivating style, students’ motivation, and students’ physical activity: a multilevel approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8307004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299907 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147457 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandorennele therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach AT decockerkatrien therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach AT declercktom therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach AT vangilbergenarwen therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach AT vanderlinderuben therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach AT haerensleen therelationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach AT vandorennele relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach AT decockerkatrien relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach AT declercktom relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach AT vangilbergenarwen relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach AT vanderlinderuben relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach AT haerensleen relationbetweenphysicaleducationteachersdemotivatingstylestudentsmotivationandstudentsphysicalactivityamultilevelapproach |