Cargando…

Comparison of Respiratory Effects between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Neoplasm: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Patient’s cooperation and respiration is necessary in percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We compared the respiratory patterns of dexmedetomidine and propofol sedation during this procedure. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the continuo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Heejoon, Kim, Doyeon, Kim, Duk Kyung, Chung, In Sun, Bang, Yu Jeong, Kim, Keoungah, Kim, Myungsuk, Choi, Ji Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8307259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143040
_version_ 1783728007541686272
author Jeong, Heejoon
Kim, Doyeon
Kim, Duk Kyung
Chung, In Sun
Bang, Yu Jeong
Kim, Keoungah
Kim, Myungsuk
Choi, Ji Won
author_facet Jeong, Heejoon
Kim, Doyeon
Kim, Duk Kyung
Chung, In Sun
Bang, Yu Jeong
Kim, Keoungah
Kim, Myungsuk
Choi, Ji Won
author_sort Jeong, Heejoon
collection PubMed
description Patient’s cooperation and respiration is necessary in percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We compared the respiratory patterns of dexmedetomidine and propofol sedation during this procedure. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the continuous infusions of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil (DR group) or the propofol-remifentanil (PR group). We measured the tidal volume for each patient’s respiration during one-minute intervals at five points and compared the standard deviation of the tidal volumes (SDvt) between the groups. Sixty-two patients completed the study. SDvt at 10 min was not different between the groups (DR group, 108.58 vs. PR group, 149.06, p = 0.451). However, SDvt and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO(2)) level of PR group were significantly increased over time compared to DR group (p = 0.004, p = 0.021; ß = 0.14, ß = −0.91, respectively). Heart rate was significantly decreased during sedation in DR group (p < 0.001, ß = −2.32). Radiologist satisfaction was significantly higher, and the incidence of apnea was lower in DR group (p = 0.010, p = 0.009, respectively). Compared with propofol-remifentanil, sedation using dexmedetomidine-remifentanil provided a lower increase of the standard deviation of tidal volume and EtCO(2), and also showed less apnea during RFA of HCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8307259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83072592021-07-25 Comparison of Respiratory Effects between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Neoplasm: A Randomized Controlled Trial Jeong, Heejoon Kim, Doyeon Kim, Duk Kyung Chung, In Sun Bang, Yu Jeong Kim, Keoungah Kim, Myungsuk Choi, Ji Won J Clin Med Article Patient’s cooperation and respiration is necessary in percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We compared the respiratory patterns of dexmedetomidine and propofol sedation during this procedure. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the continuous infusions of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil (DR group) or the propofol-remifentanil (PR group). We measured the tidal volume for each patient’s respiration during one-minute intervals at five points and compared the standard deviation of the tidal volumes (SDvt) between the groups. Sixty-two patients completed the study. SDvt at 10 min was not different between the groups (DR group, 108.58 vs. PR group, 149.06, p = 0.451). However, SDvt and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO(2)) level of PR group were significantly increased over time compared to DR group (p = 0.004, p = 0.021; ß = 0.14, ß = −0.91, respectively). Heart rate was significantly decreased during sedation in DR group (p < 0.001, ß = −2.32). Radiologist satisfaction was significantly higher, and the incidence of apnea was lower in DR group (p = 0.010, p = 0.009, respectively). Compared with propofol-remifentanil, sedation using dexmedetomidine-remifentanil provided a lower increase of the standard deviation of tidal volume and EtCO(2), and also showed less apnea during RFA of HCC. MDPI 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8307259/ /pubmed/34300205 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143040 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jeong, Heejoon
Kim, Doyeon
Kim, Duk Kyung
Chung, In Sun
Bang, Yu Jeong
Kim, Keoungah
Kim, Myungsuk
Choi, Ji Won
Comparison of Respiratory Effects between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Neoplasm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparison of Respiratory Effects between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Neoplasm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Respiratory Effects between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Neoplasm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Respiratory Effects between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Neoplasm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Respiratory Effects between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Neoplasm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Respiratory Effects between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Neoplasm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of respiratory effects between dexmedetomidine and propofol sedation for ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatic neoplasm: a randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8307259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143040
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongheejoon comparisonofrespiratoryeffectsbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolsedationforultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationofhepaticneoplasmarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimdoyeon comparisonofrespiratoryeffectsbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolsedationforultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationofhepaticneoplasmarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimdukkyung comparisonofrespiratoryeffectsbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolsedationforultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationofhepaticneoplasmarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chunginsun comparisonofrespiratoryeffectsbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolsedationforultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationofhepaticneoplasmarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bangyujeong comparisonofrespiratoryeffectsbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolsedationforultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationofhepaticneoplasmarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimkeoungah comparisonofrespiratoryeffectsbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolsedationforultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationofhepaticneoplasmarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimmyungsuk comparisonofrespiratoryeffectsbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolsedationforultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationofhepaticneoplasmarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT choijiwon comparisonofrespiratoryeffectsbetweendexmedetomidineandpropofolsedationforultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationofhepaticneoplasmarandomizedcontrolledtrial