Cargando…
A Machine Learning Model for the Prognosis of Pulseless Electrical Activity during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is characterized by the disassociation of the mechanical and electrical activity of the heart and appears as the initial rhythm in 20–30% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases. Predicting whether a patient in PEA will convert to return of spontaneous circ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8307658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209405 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23070847 |
_version_ | 1783728099912843264 |
---|---|
author | Urteaga, Jon Aramendi, Elisabete Elola, Andoni Irusta, Unai Idris, Ahamed |
author_facet | Urteaga, Jon Aramendi, Elisabete Elola, Andoni Irusta, Unai Idris, Ahamed |
author_sort | Urteaga, Jon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is characterized by the disassociation of the mechanical and electrical activity of the heart and appears as the initial rhythm in 20–30% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases. Predicting whether a patient in PEA will convert to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is important because different therapeutic strategies are needed depending on the type of PEA. The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning model to differentiate PEA with unfavorable (unPEA) and favorable (faPEA) evolution to ROSC. An OHCA dataset of 1921 [Formula: see text] PEA signal segments from defibrillator files was used, 703 faPEA segments from 107 patients with ROSC and 1218 unPEA segments from 153 patients with no ROSC. The solution consisted of a signal-processing stage of the ECG and the thoracic impedance (TI) and the extraction of the TI circulation component (ICC), which is associated with ventricular wall movement. Then, a set of 17 features was obtained from the ECG and ICC signals, and a random forest classifier was used to differentiate faPEA from unPEA. All models were trained and tested using patientwise and stratified 10-fold cross-validation partitions. The best model showed a median (interquartile range) area under the curve (AUC) of [Formula: see text] and a balance accuracy of [Formula: see text] , improving the previously available solutions at more than four points in the AUC and three points in balanced accuracy. It was demonstrated that the evolution of PEA can be predicted using the ECG and TI signals, opening the possibility of targeted PEA treatment in OHCA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8307658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83076582021-07-25 A Machine Learning Model for the Prognosis of Pulseless Electrical Activity during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Urteaga, Jon Aramendi, Elisabete Elola, Andoni Irusta, Unai Idris, Ahamed Entropy (Basel) Article Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is characterized by the disassociation of the mechanical and electrical activity of the heart and appears as the initial rhythm in 20–30% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases. Predicting whether a patient in PEA will convert to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is important because different therapeutic strategies are needed depending on the type of PEA. The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning model to differentiate PEA with unfavorable (unPEA) and favorable (faPEA) evolution to ROSC. An OHCA dataset of 1921 [Formula: see text] PEA signal segments from defibrillator files was used, 703 faPEA segments from 107 patients with ROSC and 1218 unPEA segments from 153 patients with no ROSC. The solution consisted of a signal-processing stage of the ECG and the thoracic impedance (TI) and the extraction of the TI circulation component (ICC), which is associated with ventricular wall movement. Then, a set of 17 features was obtained from the ECG and ICC signals, and a random forest classifier was used to differentiate faPEA from unPEA. All models were trained and tested using patientwise and stratified 10-fold cross-validation partitions. The best model showed a median (interquartile range) area under the curve (AUC) of [Formula: see text] and a balance accuracy of [Formula: see text] , improving the previously available solutions at more than four points in the AUC and three points in balanced accuracy. It was demonstrated that the evolution of PEA can be predicted using the ECG and TI signals, opening the possibility of targeted PEA treatment in OHCA. MDPI 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8307658/ /pubmed/34209405 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23070847 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Urteaga, Jon Aramendi, Elisabete Elola, Andoni Irusta, Unai Idris, Ahamed A Machine Learning Model for the Prognosis of Pulseless Electrical Activity during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest |
title | A Machine Learning Model for the Prognosis of Pulseless Electrical Activity during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest |
title_full | A Machine Learning Model for the Prognosis of Pulseless Electrical Activity during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest |
title_fullStr | A Machine Learning Model for the Prognosis of Pulseless Electrical Activity during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest |
title_full_unstemmed | A Machine Learning Model for the Prognosis of Pulseless Electrical Activity during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest |
title_short | A Machine Learning Model for the Prognosis of Pulseless Electrical Activity during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest |
title_sort | machine learning model for the prognosis of pulseless electrical activity during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8307658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209405 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23070847 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT urteagajon amachinelearningmodelfortheprognosisofpulselesselectricalactivityduringoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT aramendielisabete amachinelearningmodelfortheprognosisofpulselesselectricalactivityduringoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT elolaandoni amachinelearningmodelfortheprognosisofpulselesselectricalactivityduringoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT irustaunai amachinelearningmodelfortheprognosisofpulselesselectricalactivityduringoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT idrisahamed amachinelearningmodelfortheprognosisofpulselesselectricalactivityduringoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT urteagajon machinelearningmodelfortheprognosisofpulselesselectricalactivityduringoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT aramendielisabete machinelearningmodelfortheprognosisofpulselesselectricalactivityduringoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT elolaandoni machinelearningmodelfortheprognosisofpulselesselectricalactivityduringoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT irustaunai machinelearningmodelfortheprognosisofpulselesselectricalactivityduringoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT idrisahamed machinelearningmodelfortheprognosisofpulselesselectricalactivityduringoutofhospitalcardiacarrest |