Cargando…
Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT
Endometrial scratching (ES) has been proposed as a useful technique to improve outcomes in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, particularly in patients with previous implantation failures. Our objective was to determine if patients undergoing egg-donor IVF cycles had better live birth rates after E...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8308098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071167 |
_version_ | 1783728200230109184 |
---|---|
author | Izquierdo, Alexandra de la Fuente, Laura Spies, Katharina Lora, David Galindo, Alberto |
author_facet | Izquierdo, Alexandra de la Fuente, Laura Spies, Katharina Lora, David Galindo, Alberto |
author_sort | Izquierdo, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endometrial scratching (ES) has been proposed as a useful technique to improve outcomes in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, particularly in patients with previous implantation failures. Our objective was to determine if patients undergoing egg-donor IVF cycles had better live birth rates after ES, according to their previous implantation failures. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and multiple pregnancy rate. We analysed the results of 352 patients included in the Endoscratch Trial (NCT03108157). A total of 209 were patients with one or no previous implantation failures (105 with an ES done in the previous cycle, group A1, and 104 without ES, group B1), and 143 were patients with at least two previous failed implantations (71 patients with ES, group A2, and 72 without ES, group B2). We found an improvement in pregnancy rates (62.9% in group A1 vs. 55.8% in group B1 vs. 70.4% in group A2 vs. 76.4% in group B2, p = 0.028) in patients with at least two previous implantation failures, but this difference was not statistically different when we compared clinical pregnancy rates (59.1% vs. 51.0% vs. 64.8% vs. 68.1% in groups A1, B1, A2 and B2, respectively, p = 0.104) and live birth rates (52.4% vs. 43.3% vs. 57.8% vs. 55.6% in groups A1, B1, A2 and B2, respectively, p = 0.218). According to these results, we conclude that there is no evidence to recommend ES in egg-donor IVF cycles, regardless of the number of previous failed cycles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8308098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83080982021-07-25 Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT Izquierdo, Alexandra de la Fuente, Laura Spies, Katharina Lora, David Galindo, Alberto Diagnostics (Basel) Article Endometrial scratching (ES) has been proposed as a useful technique to improve outcomes in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, particularly in patients with previous implantation failures. Our objective was to determine if patients undergoing egg-donor IVF cycles had better live birth rates after ES, according to their previous implantation failures. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and multiple pregnancy rate. We analysed the results of 352 patients included in the Endoscratch Trial (NCT03108157). A total of 209 were patients with one or no previous implantation failures (105 with an ES done in the previous cycle, group A1, and 104 without ES, group B1), and 143 were patients with at least two previous failed implantations (71 patients with ES, group A2, and 72 without ES, group B2). We found an improvement in pregnancy rates (62.9% in group A1 vs. 55.8% in group B1 vs. 70.4% in group A2 vs. 76.4% in group B2, p = 0.028) in patients with at least two previous implantation failures, but this difference was not statistically different when we compared clinical pregnancy rates (59.1% vs. 51.0% vs. 64.8% vs. 68.1% in groups A1, B1, A2 and B2, respectively, p = 0.104) and live birth rates (52.4% vs. 43.3% vs. 57.8% vs. 55.6% in groups A1, B1, A2 and B2, respectively, p = 0.218). According to these results, we conclude that there is no evidence to recommend ES in egg-donor IVF cycles, regardless of the number of previous failed cycles. MDPI 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8308098/ /pubmed/34206975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071167 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Izquierdo, Alexandra de la Fuente, Laura Spies, Katharina Lora, David Galindo, Alberto Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT |
title | Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT |
title_full | Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT |
title_fullStr | Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT |
title_short | Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT |
title_sort | is endometrial scratching beneficial for patients undergoing a donor-egg cycle with or without previous implantation failures? results of a post-hoc analysis of an rct |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8308098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT izquierdoalexandra isendometrialscratchingbeneficialforpatientsundergoingadonoreggcyclewithorwithoutpreviousimplantationfailuresresultsofaposthocanalysisofanrct AT delafuentelaura isendometrialscratchingbeneficialforpatientsundergoingadonoreggcyclewithorwithoutpreviousimplantationfailuresresultsofaposthocanalysisofanrct AT spieskatharina isendometrialscratchingbeneficialforpatientsundergoingadonoreggcyclewithorwithoutpreviousimplantationfailuresresultsofaposthocanalysisofanrct AT loradavid isendometrialscratchingbeneficialforpatientsundergoingadonoreggcyclewithorwithoutpreviousimplantationfailuresresultsofaposthocanalysisofanrct AT galindoalberto isendometrialscratchingbeneficialforpatientsundergoingadonoreggcyclewithorwithoutpreviousimplantationfailuresresultsofaposthocanalysisofanrct |