Cargando…

Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT

Endometrial scratching (ES) has been proposed as a useful technique to improve outcomes in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, particularly in patients with previous implantation failures. Our objective was to determine if patients undergoing egg-donor IVF cycles had better live birth rates after E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Izquierdo, Alexandra, de la Fuente, Laura, Spies, Katharina, Lora, David, Galindo, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8308098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071167
_version_ 1783728200230109184
author Izquierdo, Alexandra
de la Fuente, Laura
Spies, Katharina
Lora, David
Galindo, Alberto
author_facet Izquierdo, Alexandra
de la Fuente, Laura
Spies, Katharina
Lora, David
Galindo, Alberto
author_sort Izquierdo, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description Endometrial scratching (ES) has been proposed as a useful technique to improve outcomes in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, particularly in patients with previous implantation failures. Our objective was to determine if patients undergoing egg-donor IVF cycles had better live birth rates after ES, according to their previous implantation failures. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and multiple pregnancy rate. We analysed the results of 352 patients included in the Endoscratch Trial (NCT03108157). A total of 209 were patients with one or no previous implantation failures (105 with an ES done in the previous cycle, group A1, and 104 without ES, group B1), and 143 were patients with at least two previous failed implantations (71 patients with ES, group A2, and 72 without ES, group B2). We found an improvement in pregnancy rates (62.9% in group A1 vs. 55.8% in group B1 vs. 70.4% in group A2 vs. 76.4% in group B2, p = 0.028) in patients with at least two previous implantation failures, but this difference was not statistically different when we compared clinical pregnancy rates (59.1% vs. 51.0% vs. 64.8% vs. 68.1% in groups A1, B1, A2 and B2, respectively, p = 0.104) and live birth rates (52.4% vs. 43.3% vs. 57.8% vs. 55.6% in groups A1, B1, A2 and B2, respectively, p = 0.218). According to these results, we conclude that there is no evidence to recommend ES in egg-donor IVF cycles, regardless of the number of previous failed cycles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8308098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83080982021-07-25 Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT Izquierdo, Alexandra de la Fuente, Laura Spies, Katharina Lora, David Galindo, Alberto Diagnostics (Basel) Article Endometrial scratching (ES) has been proposed as a useful technique to improve outcomes in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, particularly in patients with previous implantation failures. Our objective was to determine if patients undergoing egg-donor IVF cycles had better live birth rates after ES, according to their previous implantation failures. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and multiple pregnancy rate. We analysed the results of 352 patients included in the Endoscratch Trial (NCT03108157). A total of 209 were patients with one or no previous implantation failures (105 with an ES done in the previous cycle, group A1, and 104 without ES, group B1), and 143 were patients with at least two previous failed implantations (71 patients with ES, group A2, and 72 without ES, group B2). We found an improvement in pregnancy rates (62.9% in group A1 vs. 55.8% in group B1 vs. 70.4% in group A2 vs. 76.4% in group B2, p = 0.028) in patients with at least two previous implantation failures, but this difference was not statistically different when we compared clinical pregnancy rates (59.1% vs. 51.0% vs. 64.8% vs. 68.1% in groups A1, B1, A2 and B2, respectively, p = 0.104) and live birth rates (52.4% vs. 43.3% vs. 57.8% vs. 55.6% in groups A1, B1, A2 and B2, respectively, p = 0.218). According to these results, we conclude that there is no evidence to recommend ES in egg-donor IVF cycles, regardless of the number of previous failed cycles. MDPI 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8308098/ /pubmed/34206975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071167 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Izquierdo, Alexandra
de la Fuente, Laura
Spies, Katharina
Lora, David
Galindo, Alberto
Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT
title Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT
title_full Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT
title_fullStr Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT
title_full_unstemmed Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT
title_short Is Endometrial Scratching Beneficial for Patients Undergoing a Donor-Egg Cycle with or without Previous Implantation Failures? Results of a Post-Hoc Analysis of an RCT
title_sort is endometrial scratching beneficial for patients undergoing a donor-egg cycle with or without previous implantation failures? results of a post-hoc analysis of an rct
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8308098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34206975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071167
work_keys_str_mv AT izquierdoalexandra isendometrialscratchingbeneficialforpatientsundergoingadonoreggcyclewithorwithoutpreviousimplantationfailuresresultsofaposthocanalysisofanrct
AT delafuentelaura isendometrialscratchingbeneficialforpatientsundergoingadonoreggcyclewithorwithoutpreviousimplantationfailuresresultsofaposthocanalysisofanrct
AT spieskatharina isendometrialscratchingbeneficialforpatientsundergoingadonoreggcyclewithorwithoutpreviousimplantationfailuresresultsofaposthocanalysisofanrct
AT loradavid isendometrialscratchingbeneficialforpatientsundergoingadonoreggcyclewithorwithoutpreviousimplantationfailuresresultsofaposthocanalysisofanrct
AT galindoalberto isendometrialscratchingbeneficialforpatientsundergoingadonoreggcyclewithorwithoutpreviousimplantationfailuresresultsofaposthocanalysisofanrct