Cargando…

Gastrointestinal Tolerance and Protein Absorption Markers with a New Peptide Enteral Formula Compared to a Standard Intact Protein Enteral Formula in Critically Ill Patients

The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate gastrointestinal tolerance and protein absorption markers with a new enteral peptide formula (PF) compared to an isocaloric enteral intact protein standard formula (SF) containing the same amount of protein in ICU patients. Patients admitted to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Brito-Ashurst, Ione, Klebach, Marianne, Tsompanaki, Eleni, Kaul, Sundeep, van Horssen, Peter, Hofman, Zandrie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8308653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34371872
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13072362
_version_ 1783728332406259712
author de Brito-Ashurst, Ione
Klebach, Marianne
Tsompanaki, Eleni
Kaul, Sundeep
van Horssen, Peter
Hofman, Zandrie
author_facet de Brito-Ashurst, Ione
Klebach, Marianne
Tsompanaki, Eleni
Kaul, Sundeep
van Horssen, Peter
Hofman, Zandrie
author_sort de Brito-Ashurst, Ione
collection PubMed
description The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate gastrointestinal tolerance and protein absorption markers with a new enteral peptide formula (PF) compared to an isocaloric enteral intact protein standard formula (SF) containing the same amount of protein in ICU patients. Patients admitted to a cardio-thoracic intensive care unit expected to receive tube feeding for ≥5 days were randomized to receive either PF (1.5 kcal/mL) or SF in a double-blind manner for ≤14 days. Twenty-six patients were randomized (13 SF and 13 PF) and 23 (12 SF and 11 PF) completed at least 5 days of product administration. There were no statistically significant differences between the feeds during the first 5 days of intervention for diarrhea (SF:3 (23%); PF:5 (39%), p = 0.388), vomiting (SF:1 (8%); PF:2 (15%), p = 0.549), constipation (SF:7 (54%), PF:3 (23%), p = 0.115), and high gastric residual volume (>500 mL: SF:1 (8%); PF: 2 (15%), p = 0.535). There were no differences in plasma amino acids or urinary markers of protein absorption and metabolism. In conclusion, no major differences were found in tolerability and protein absorption markers between the standard intact protein formula and the peptide formula.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8308653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83086532021-07-25 Gastrointestinal Tolerance and Protein Absorption Markers with a New Peptide Enteral Formula Compared to a Standard Intact Protein Enteral Formula in Critically Ill Patients de Brito-Ashurst, Ione Klebach, Marianne Tsompanaki, Eleni Kaul, Sundeep van Horssen, Peter Hofman, Zandrie Nutrients Article The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate gastrointestinal tolerance and protein absorption markers with a new enteral peptide formula (PF) compared to an isocaloric enteral intact protein standard formula (SF) containing the same amount of protein in ICU patients. Patients admitted to a cardio-thoracic intensive care unit expected to receive tube feeding for ≥5 days were randomized to receive either PF (1.5 kcal/mL) or SF in a double-blind manner for ≤14 days. Twenty-six patients were randomized (13 SF and 13 PF) and 23 (12 SF and 11 PF) completed at least 5 days of product administration. There were no statistically significant differences between the feeds during the first 5 days of intervention for diarrhea (SF:3 (23%); PF:5 (39%), p = 0.388), vomiting (SF:1 (8%); PF:2 (15%), p = 0.549), constipation (SF:7 (54%), PF:3 (23%), p = 0.115), and high gastric residual volume (>500 mL: SF:1 (8%); PF: 2 (15%), p = 0.535). There were no differences in plasma amino acids or urinary markers of protein absorption and metabolism. In conclusion, no major differences were found in tolerability and protein absorption markers between the standard intact protein formula and the peptide formula. MDPI 2021-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8308653/ /pubmed/34371872 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13072362 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
de Brito-Ashurst, Ione
Klebach, Marianne
Tsompanaki, Eleni
Kaul, Sundeep
van Horssen, Peter
Hofman, Zandrie
Gastrointestinal Tolerance and Protein Absorption Markers with a New Peptide Enteral Formula Compared to a Standard Intact Protein Enteral Formula in Critically Ill Patients
title Gastrointestinal Tolerance and Protein Absorption Markers with a New Peptide Enteral Formula Compared to a Standard Intact Protein Enteral Formula in Critically Ill Patients
title_full Gastrointestinal Tolerance and Protein Absorption Markers with a New Peptide Enteral Formula Compared to a Standard Intact Protein Enteral Formula in Critically Ill Patients
title_fullStr Gastrointestinal Tolerance and Protein Absorption Markers with a New Peptide Enteral Formula Compared to a Standard Intact Protein Enteral Formula in Critically Ill Patients
title_full_unstemmed Gastrointestinal Tolerance and Protein Absorption Markers with a New Peptide Enteral Formula Compared to a Standard Intact Protein Enteral Formula in Critically Ill Patients
title_short Gastrointestinal Tolerance and Protein Absorption Markers with a New Peptide Enteral Formula Compared to a Standard Intact Protein Enteral Formula in Critically Ill Patients
title_sort gastrointestinal tolerance and protein absorption markers with a new peptide enteral formula compared to a standard intact protein enteral formula in critically ill patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8308653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34371872
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13072362
work_keys_str_mv AT debritoashurstione gastrointestinaltoleranceandproteinabsorptionmarkerswithanewpeptideenteralformulacomparedtoastandardintactproteinenteralformulaincriticallyillpatients
AT klebachmarianne gastrointestinaltoleranceandproteinabsorptionmarkerswithanewpeptideenteralformulacomparedtoastandardintactproteinenteralformulaincriticallyillpatients
AT tsompanakieleni gastrointestinaltoleranceandproteinabsorptionmarkerswithanewpeptideenteralformulacomparedtoastandardintactproteinenteralformulaincriticallyillpatients
AT kaulsundeep gastrointestinaltoleranceandproteinabsorptionmarkerswithanewpeptideenteralformulacomparedtoastandardintactproteinenteralformulaincriticallyillpatients
AT vanhorssenpeter gastrointestinaltoleranceandproteinabsorptionmarkerswithanewpeptideenteralformulacomparedtoastandardintactproteinenteralformulaincriticallyillpatients
AT hofmanzandrie gastrointestinaltoleranceandproteinabsorptionmarkerswithanewpeptideenteralformulacomparedtoastandardintactproteinenteralformulaincriticallyillpatients