Cargando…

Natural-Based Biomaterial for Skin Wound Healing (Gelatin vs. Collagen): Expert Review

Collagen (Col) and gelatin are most extensively used in various fields, particularly in pharmaceuticals and therapeutics. Numerous researchers have proven that they are highly biocompatible to human tissues, exhibit low antigenicity and are easy to degrade. Despite their different sources both Col a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naomi, Ruth, Bahari, Hasnah, Ridzuan, Pauzi Muhd, Othman, Fezah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8309321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34301076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13142319
_version_ 1783728495961047040
author Naomi, Ruth
Bahari, Hasnah
Ridzuan, Pauzi Muhd
Othman, Fezah
author_facet Naomi, Ruth
Bahari, Hasnah
Ridzuan, Pauzi Muhd
Othman, Fezah
author_sort Naomi, Ruth
collection PubMed
description Collagen (Col) and gelatin are most extensively used in various fields, particularly in pharmaceuticals and therapeutics. Numerous researchers have proven that they are highly biocompatible to human tissues, exhibit low antigenicity and are easy to degrade. Despite their different sources both Col and gelatin have almost the same effects when it comes to wound healing mechanisms. Considering this, the bioactivity and biological effects of both Col and gelatin have been, and are being, constantly investigated through in vitro and in vivo assays to obtain maximum outcomes in the future. With regard to their proven nutritional values as sources of protein, Col and gelatin products exert various possible biological activities on cells in the extracellular matrix (ECM). In addition, a vast number of novel Col and gelatin applications have been discovered. This review compared Col and gelatin in terms of their structures, sources of derivatives, physicochemical properties, results of in vitro and in vivo studies, their roles in wound healing and the current challenges in wound healing. Thus, this review provides the current insights and the latest discoveries on both Col and gelatin in their wound healing mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8309321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83093212021-07-25 Natural-Based Biomaterial for Skin Wound Healing (Gelatin vs. Collagen): Expert Review Naomi, Ruth Bahari, Hasnah Ridzuan, Pauzi Muhd Othman, Fezah Polymers (Basel) Review Collagen (Col) and gelatin are most extensively used in various fields, particularly in pharmaceuticals and therapeutics. Numerous researchers have proven that they are highly biocompatible to human tissues, exhibit low antigenicity and are easy to degrade. Despite their different sources both Col and gelatin have almost the same effects when it comes to wound healing mechanisms. Considering this, the bioactivity and biological effects of both Col and gelatin have been, and are being, constantly investigated through in vitro and in vivo assays to obtain maximum outcomes in the future. With regard to their proven nutritional values as sources of protein, Col and gelatin products exert various possible biological activities on cells in the extracellular matrix (ECM). In addition, a vast number of novel Col and gelatin applications have been discovered. This review compared Col and gelatin in terms of their structures, sources of derivatives, physicochemical properties, results of in vitro and in vivo studies, their roles in wound healing and the current challenges in wound healing. Thus, this review provides the current insights and the latest discoveries on both Col and gelatin in their wound healing mechanisms. MDPI 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8309321/ /pubmed/34301076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13142319 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Naomi, Ruth
Bahari, Hasnah
Ridzuan, Pauzi Muhd
Othman, Fezah
Natural-Based Biomaterial for Skin Wound Healing (Gelatin vs. Collagen): Expert Review
title Natural-Based Biomaterial for Skin Wound Healing (Gelatin vs. Collagen): Expert Review
title_full Natural-Based Biomaterial for Skin Wound Healing (Gelatin vs. Collagen): Expert Review
title_fullStr Natural-Based Biomaterial for Skin Wound Healing (Gelatin vs. Collagen): Expert Review
title_full_unstemmed Natural-Based Biomaterial for Skin Wound Healing (Gelatin vs. Collagen): Expert Review
title_short Natural-Based Biomaterial for Skin Wound Healing (Gelatin vs. Collagen): Expert Review
title_sort natural-based biomaterial for skin wound healing (gelatin vs. collagen): expert review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8309321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34301076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13142319
work_keys_str_mv AT naomiruth naturalbasedbiomaterialforskinwoundhealinggelatinvscollagenexpertreview
AT baharihasnah naturalbasedbiomaterialforskinwoundhealinggelatinvscollagenexpertreview
AT ridzuanpauzimuhd naturalbasedbiomaterialforskinwoundhealinggelatinvscollagenexpertreview
AT othmanfezah naturalbasedbiomaterialforskinwoundhealinggelatinvscollagenexpertreview