Cargando…

Comparison between Accelerometer and Gyroscope in Predicting Level-Ground Running Kinematics by Treadmill Running Kinematics Using a Single Wearable Sensor

Wearable sensors facilitate running kinematics analysis of joint kinematics in real running environments. The use of a few sensors or, ideally, a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) is preferable for accurate gait analysis. This study aimed to use a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Daniel Hung Kay, Tremblay, Luc, Lam, Chor Yin, Yeung, Adrian Wai Yin, Cheng, Wilson Ho Wu, Tse, Peter Tin Wah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8309515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21144633
_version_ 1783728539770552320
author Chow, Daniel Hung Kay
Tremblay, Luc
Lam, Chor Yin
Yeung, Adrian Wai Yin
Cheng, Wilson Ho Wu
Tse, Peter Tin Wah
author_facet Chow, Daniel Hung Kay
Tremblay, Luc
Lam, Chor Yin
Yeung, Adrian Wai Yin
Cheng, Wilson Ho Wu
Tse, Peter Tin Wah
author_sort Chow, Daniel Hung Kay
collection PubMed
description Wearable sensors facilitate running kinematics analysis of joint kinematics in real running environments. The use of a few sensors or, ideally, a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) is preferable for accurate gait analysis. This study aimed to use a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict level-ground running kinematics (measured by four IMUs on the lower extremities) by using treadmill running kinematics training data measured using a single IMU on the anteromedial side of the right tibia and to compare the performance of level-ground running kinematics predictions between raw accelerometer and gyroscope data. The CNN model performed regression for intraparticipant and interparticipant scenarios and predicted running kinematics. Ten recreational runners were recruited. Accelerometer and gyroscope data were collected. Intraparticipant and interparticipant R(2) values of actual and predicted running kinematics ranged from 0.85 to 0.96 and from 0.7 to 0.92, respectively. Normalized root mean squared error values of actual and predicted running kinematics ranged from 3.6% to 10.8% and from 7.4% to 10.8% in intraparticipant and interparticipant tests, respectively. Kinematics predictions in the sagittal plane were found to be better for the knee joint than for the hip joint, and predictions using the gyroscope as the regressor were demonstrated to be significantly better than those using the accelerometer as the regressor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8309515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83095152021-07-25 Comparison between Accelerometer and Gyroscope in Predicting Level-Ground Running Kinematics by Treadmill Running Kinematics Using a Single Wearable Sensor Chow, Daniel Hung Kay Tremblay, Luc Lam, Chor Yin Yeung, Adrian Wai Yin Cheng, Wilson Ho Wu Tse, Peter Tin Wah Sensors (Basel) Article Wearable sensors facilitate running kinematics analysis of joint kinematics in real running environments. The use of a few sensors or, ideally, a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) is preferable for accurate gait analysis. This study aimed to use a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict level-ground running kinematics (measured by four IMUs on the lower extremities) by using treadmill running kinematics training data measured using a single IMU on the anteromedial side of the right tibia and to compare the performance of level-ground running kinematics predictions between raw accelerometer and gyroscope data. The CNN model performed regression for intraparticipant and interparticipant scenarios and predicted running kinematics. Ten recreational runners were recruited. Accelerometer and gyroscope data were collected. Intraparticipant and interparticipant R(2) values of actual and predicted running kinematics ranged from 0.85 to 0.96 and from 0.7 to 0.92, respectively. Normalized root mean squared error values of actual and predicted running kinematics ranged from 3.6% to 10.8% and from 7.4% to 10.8% in intraparticipant and interparticipant tests, respectively. Kinematics predictions in the sagittal plane were found to be better for the knee joint than for the hip joint, and predictions using the gyroscope as the regressor were demonstrated to be significantly better than those using the accelerometer as the regressor. MDPI 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8309515/ /pubmed/34300372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21144633 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chow, Daniel Hung Kay
Tremblay, Luc
Lam, Chor Yin
Yeung, Adrian Wai Yin
Cheng, Wilson Ho Wu
Tse, Peter Tin Wah
Comparison between Accelerometer and Gyroscope in Predicting Level-Ground Running Kinematics by Treadmill Running Kinematics Using a Single Wearable Sensor
title Comparison between Accelerometer and Gyroscope in Predicting Level-Ground Running Kinematics by Treadmill Running Kinematics Using a Single Wearable Sensor
title_full Comparison between Accelerometer and Gyroscope in Predicting Level-Ground Running Kinematics by Treadmill Running Kinematics Using a Single Wearable Sensor
title_fullStr Comparison between Accelerometer and Gyroscope in Predicting Level-Ground Running Kinematics by Treadmill Running Kinematics Using a Single Wearable Sensor
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Accelerometer and Gyroscope in Predicting Level-Ground Running Kinematics by Treadmill Running Kinematics Using a Single Wearable Sensor
title_short Comparison between Accelerometer and Gyroscope in Predicting Level-Ground Running Kinematics by Treadmill Running Kinematics Using a Single Wearable Sensor
title_sort comparison between accelerometer and gyroscope in predicting level-ground running kinematics by treadmill running kinematics using a single wearable sensor
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8309515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21144633
work_keys_str_mv AT chowdanielhungkay comparisonbetweenaccelerometerandgyroscopeinpredictinglevelgroundrunningkinematicsbytreadmillrunningkinematicsusingasinglewearablesensor
AT tremblayluc comparisonbetweenaccelerometerandgyroscopeinpredictinglevelgroundrunningkinematicsbytreadmillrunningkinematicsusingasinglewearablesensor
AT lamchoryin comparisonbetweenaccelerometerandgyroscopeinpredictinglevelgroundrunningkinematicsbytreadmillrunningkinematicsusingasinglewearablesensor
AT yeungadrianwaiyin comparisonbetweenaccelerometerandgyroscopeinpredictinglevelgroundrunningkinematicsbytreadmillrunningkinematicsusingasinglewearablesensor
AT chengwilsonhowu comparisonbetweenaccelerometerandgyroscopeinpredictinglevelgroundrunningkinematicsbytreadmillrunningkinematicsusingasinglewearablesensor
AT tsepetertinwah comparisonbetweenaccelerometerandgyroscopeinpredictinglevelgroundrunningkinematicsbytreadmillrunningkinematicsusingasinglewearablesensor