Cargando…
Classification of the Acoustics of Loose Gravel †
Road condition evaluation is a critical part of gravel road maintenance. One of the assessed parameters is the amount of loose gravel, as this determines the driving quality and safety. Loose gravel can cause tires to slip and the driver to lose control. An expert assesses the road conditions subjec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8309789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300684 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21144944 |
_version_ | 1783728605277192192 |
---|---|
author | Saeed, Nausheen Nyberg, Roger G. Alam, Moudud Dougherty, Mark Jooma, Diala Rebreyend, Pascal |
author_facet | Saeed, Nausheen Nyberg, Roger G. Alam, Moudud Dougherty, Mark Jooma, Diala Rebreyend, Pascal |
author_sort | Saeed, Nausheen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Road condition evaluation is a critical part of gravel road maintenance. One of the assessed parameters is the amount of loose gravel, as this determines the driving quality and safety. Loose gravel can cause tires to slip and the driver to lose control. An expert assesses the road conditions subjectively by looking at images and notes. This method is labor-intensive and subject to error in judgment; therefore, its reliability is questionable. Road management agencies look for automated and objective measurement systems. In this study, acoustic data on gravel hitting the bottom of a car was used. The connection between the acoustics and the condition of loose gravel on gravel roads was assessed. Traditional supervised learning algorithms and convolution neural network (CNN) were applied, and their performances are compared for the classification of loose gravel acoustics. The advantage of using a pre-trained CNN is that it selects relevant features for training. In addition, pre-trained networks offer the advantage of not requiring days of training or colossal training data. In supervised learning, the accuracy of the ensemble bagged tree algorithm for gravel and non-gravel sound classification was found to be 97.5%, whereas, in the case of deep learning, pre-trained network GoogLeNet accuracy was 97.91% for classifying spectrogram images of the gravel sounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8309789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83097892021-07-25 Classification of the Acoustics of Loose Gravel † Saeed, Nausheen Nyberg, Roger G. Alam, Moudud Dougherty, Mark Jooma, Diala Rebreyend, Pascal Sensors (Basel) Article Road condition evaluation is a critical part of gravel road maintenance. One of the assessed parameters is the amount of loose gravel, as this determines the driving quality and safety. Loose gravel can cause tires to slip and the driver to lose control. An expert assesses the road conditions subjectively by looking at images and notes. This method is labor-intensive and subject to error in judgment; therefore, its reliability is questionable. Road management agencies look for automated and objective measurement systems. In this study, acoustic data on gravel hitting the bottom of a car was used. The connection between the acoustics and the condition of loose gravel on gravel roads was assessed. Traditional supervised learning algorithms and convolution neural network (CNN) were applied, and their performances are compared for the classification of loose gravel acoustics. The advantage of using a pre-trained CNN is that it selects relevant features for training. In addition, pre-trained networks offer the advantage of not requiring days of training or colossal training data. In supervised learning, the accuracy of the ensemble bagged tree algorithm for gravel and non-gravel sound classification was found to be 97.5%, whereas, in the case of deep learning, pre-trained network GoogLeNet accuracy was 97.91% for classifying spectrogram images of the gravel sounds. MDPI 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8309789/ /pubmed/34300684 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21144944 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Saeed, Nausheen Nyberg, Roger G. Alam, Moudud Dougherty, Mark Jooma, Diala Rebreyend, Pascal Classification of the Acoustics of Loose Gravel † |
title | Classification of the Acoustics of Loose Gravel † |
title_full | Classification of the Acoustics of Loose Gravel † |
title_fullStr | Classification of the Acoustics of Loose Gravel † |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification of the Acoustics of Loose Gravel † |
title_short | Classification of the Acoustics of Loose Gravel † |
title_sort | classification of the acoustics of loose gravel † |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8309789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300684 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21144944 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saeednausheen classificationoftheacousticsofloosegravel AT nybergrogerg classificationoftheacousticsofloosegravel AT alammoudud classificationoftheacousticsofloosegravel AT doughertymark classificationoftheacousticsofloosegravel AT joomadiala classificationoftheacousticsofloosegravel AT rebreyendpascal classificationoftheacousticsofloosegravel |