Cargando…
Accessing Dietary Effects on the Rumen Microbiome: Different Sequencing Methods Tell Different Stories
The current study employed both amplicon and shotgun sequencing to examine and compare the rumen microbiome in Angus bulls fed with either a backgrounding diet (BCK) or finishing diet (HG), to assess if both methods produce comparable results. Rumen digesta samples from 16 bulls were subjected for m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34357930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8070138 |
_version_ | 1783728659252641792 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Mi O’Hara, Eóin Tang, Shaoxun Chen, Yanhong Walpole, Matthew E. Górka, Paweł Penner, Gregory B. Guan, Le Luo |
author_facet | Zhou, Mi O’Hara, Eóin Tang, Shaoxun Chen, Yanhong Walpole, Matthew E. Górka, Paweł Penner, Gregory B. Guan, Le Luo |
author_sort | Zhou, Mi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current study employed both amplicon and shotgun sequencing to examine and compare the rumen microbiome in Angus bulls fed with either a backgrounding diet (BCK) or finishing diet (HG), to assess if both methods produce comparable results. Rumen digesta samples from 16 bulls were subjected for microbial profiling. Distinctive microbial profiles were revealed by the two methods, indicating that choice of sequencing approach may be a critical facet in studies of the rumen microbiome. Shotgun-sequencing identified the presence of 303 bacterial genera and 171 archaeal species, several of which exhibited differential abundance. Amplicon-sequencing identified 48 bacterial genera, 4 archaeal species, and 9 protozoal species. Among them, 20 bacterial genera and 5 protozoal species were differentially abundant between the two diets. Overall, amplicon-sequencing showed a more drastic diet-derived effect on the ruminal microbial profile compared to shotgun-sequencing. While both methods detected dietary differences at various taxonomic levels, few consistent patterns were evident. Opposite results were seen for the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, and the genus Selenomonas. This study showcases the importance of sequencing platform choice and suggests a need for integrative methods that allow robust comparisons of microbial data drawn from various omic approaches, allowing for comprehensive comparisons across studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8310016 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83100162021-07-25 Accessing Dietary Effects on the Rumen Microbiome: Different Sequencing Methods Tell Different Stories Zhou, Mi O’Hara, Eóin Tang, Shaoxun Chen, Yanhong Walpole, Matthew E. Górka, Paweł Penner, Gregory B. Guan, Le Luo Vet Sci Article The current study employed both amplicon and shotgun sequencing to examine and compare the rumen microbiome in Angus bulls fed with either a backgrounding diet (BCK) or finishing diet (HG), to assess if both methods produce comparable results. Rumen digesta samples from 16 bulls were subjected for microbial profiling. Distinctive microbial profiles were revealed by the two methods, indicating that choice of sequencing approach may be a critical facet in studies of the rumen microbiome. Shotgun-sequencing identified the presence of 303 bacterial genera and 171 archaeal species, several of which exhibited differential abundance. Amplicon-sequencing identified 48 bacterial genera, 4 archaeal species, and 9 protozoal species. Among them, 20 bacterial genera and 5 protozoal species were differentially abundant between the two diets. Overall, amplicon-sequencing showed a more drastic diet-derived effect on the ruminal microbial profile compared to shotgun-sequencing. While both methods detected dietary differences at various taxonomic levels, few consistent patterns were evident. Opposite results were seen for the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, and the genus Selenomonas. This study showcases the importance of sequencing platform choice and suggests a need for integrative methods that allow robust comparisons of microbial data drawn from various omic approaches, allowing for comprehensive comparisons across studies. MDPI 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8310016/ /pubmed/34357930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8070138 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhou, Mi O’Hara, Eóin Tang, Shaoxun Chen, Yanhong Walpole, Matthew E. Górka, Paweł Penner, Gregory B. Guan, Le Luo Accessing Dietary Effects on the Rumen Microbiome: Different Sequencing Methods Tell Different Stories |
title | Accessing Dietary Effects on the Rumen Microbiome: Different Sequencing Methods Tell Different Stories |
title_full | Accessing Dietary Effects on the Rumen Microbiome: Different Sequencing Methods Tell Different Stories |
title_fullStr | Accessing Dietary Effects on the Rumen Microbiome: Different Sequencing Methods Tell Different Stories |
title_full_unstemmed | Accessing Dietary Effects on the Rumen Microbiome: Different Sequencing Methods Tell Different Stories |
title_short | Accessing Dietary Effects on the Rumen Microbiome: Different Sequencing Methods Tell Different Stories |
title_sort | accessing dietary effects on the rumen microbiome: different sequencing methods tell different stories |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34357930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8070138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoumi accessingdietaryeffectsontherumenmicrobiomedifferentsequencingmethodstelldifferentstories AT oharaeoin accessingdietaryeffectsontherumenmicrobiomedifferentsequencingmethodstelldifferentstories AT tangshaoxun accessingdietaryeffectsontherumenmicrobiomedifferentsequencingmethodstelldifferentstories AT chenyanhong accessingdietaryeffectsontherumenmicrobiomedifferentsequencingmethodstelldifferentstories AT walpolematthewe accessingdietaryeffectsontherumenmicrobiomedifferentsequencingmethodstelldifferentstories AT gorkapaweł accessingdietaryeffectsontherumenmicrobiomedifferentsequencingmethodstelldifferentstories AT pennergregoryb accessingdietaryeffectsontherumenmicrobiomedifferentsequencingmethodstelldifferentstories AT guanleluo accessingdietaryeffectsontherumenmicrobiomedifferentsequencingmethodstelldifferentstories |