Cargando…

Low PEEP Mechanical Ventilation and PaO(2)/FiO(2) Ratio Evolution in COVID-19 Patients

Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is the standard treatment in critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). When IMV setting is extremely aggressive, especially through the application of high positive-end-expiratory respiration (PEEP) values, lung dam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ceruti, Samuele, Roncador, Marco, Saporito, Andrea, Biggiogero, Maira, Glotta, Andrea, Maida, Pier Andrea, Urso, Patrizia, Bona, Giovanni, Garzoni, Christian, Mauri, Romano, Borgeat, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42399-021-01031-x
_version_ 1783728752580100096
author Ceruti, Samuele
Roncador, Marco
Saporito, Andrea
Biggiogero, Maira
Glotta, Andrea
Maida, Pier Andrea
Urso, Patrizia
Bona, Giovanni
Garzoni, Christian
Mauri, Romano
Borgeat, Alain
author_facet Ceruti, Samuele
Roncador, Marco
Saporito, Andrea
Biggiogero, Maira
Glotta, Andrea
Maida, Pier Andrea
Urso, Patrizia
Bona, Giovanni
Garzoni, Christian
Mauri, Romano
Borgeat, Alain
author_sort Ceruti, Samuele
collection PubMed
description Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is the standard treatment in critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). When IMV setting is extremely aggressive, especially through the application of high positive-end-expiratory respiration (PEEP) values, lung damage can occur. Until today, in COVID-19 patients, two types of ARDS were identified (L- and H-type); for the L-type, a lower PEEP strategy was supposed to be preferred, but data are still missing. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a clinical management with lower PEEP values in critically ill L-type COVID-19 patients was safe and efficient in comparison to usual standard of care. A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients with COVID-19 ARDS admitted to the ICU and treated with IMV. Patients were treated with a lower PEEP strategy adapted to BMI: PEEP 10 cmH(2)O if BMI < 30 kg m(−2), PEEP 12 cmH(2)O if BMI 30–50 kg m(−2), PEEP 15 cmH(2)O if BMI > 50 kg m(−2). Primary endpoint was the PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio evolution during the first 3 IMV days; secondary endpoints were to analyze ICU length of stay (LOS) and IMV length. From March 2 to January 15, 2021, 79 patients underwent IMV. Average applied PEEP was 11 ± 2.9 cmH(2)O for BMI < 30 kg m(−2) and 16 ± 3.18 cmH(2)O for BMI > 30 kg m(−2). During the first 24 h of IMV, patients’ PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio presented an improvement (p<0.001; CI 99%) that continued daily up to 72 h (p<0.001; CI 99%). Median ICU LOS was 15 days (10–28); median duration of IMV was 12 days (8–26). The ICU mortality rate was 31.6%. Lower PEEP strategy treatment in L-type COVID-19 ARDS resulted in a PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio persistent daily improvement during the first 72 h of IMV. A lower PEEP strategy could be beneficial in the first phase of ARDS in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8310399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83103992021-07-26 Low PEEP Mechanical Ventilation and PaO(2)/FiO(2) Ratio Evolution in COVID-19 Patients Ceruti, Samuele Roncador, Marco Saporito, Andrea Biggiogero, Maira Glotta, Andrea Maida, Pier Andrea Urso, Patrizia Bona, Giovanni Garzoni, Christian Mauri, Romano Borgeat, Alain SN Compr Clin Med Covid-19 Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is the standard treatment in critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). When IMV setting is extremely aggressive, especially through the application of high positive-end-expiratory respiration (PEEP) values, lung damage can occur. Until today, in COVID-19 patients, two types of ARDS were identified (L- and H-type); for the L-type, a lower PEEP strategy was supposed to be preferred, but data are still missing. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a clinical management with lower PEEP values in critically ill L-type COVID-19 patients was safe and efficient in comparison to usual standard of care. A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients with COVID-19 ARDS admitted to the ICU and treated with IMV. Patients were treated with a lower PEEP strategy adapted to BMI: PEEP 10 cmH(2)O if BMI < 30 kg m(−2), PEEP 12 cmH(2)O if BMI 30–50 kg m(−2), PEEP 15 cmH(2)O if BMI > 50 kg m(−2). Primary endpoint was the PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio evolution during the first 3 IMV days; secondary endpoints were to analyze ICU length of stay (LOS) and IMV length. From March 2 to January 15, 2021, 79 patients underwent IMV. Average applied PEEP was 11 ± 2.9 cmH(2)O for BMI < 30 kg m(−2) and 16 ± 3.18 cmH(2)O for BMI > 30 kg m(−2). During the first 24 h of IMV, patients’ PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio presented an improvement (p<0.001; CI 99%) that continued daily up to 72 h (p<0.001; CI 99%). Median ICU LOS was 15 days (10–28); median duration of IMV was 12 days (8–26). The ICU mortality rate was 31.6%. Lower PEEP strategy treatment in L-type COVID-19 ARDS resulted in a PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio persistent daily improvement during the first 72 h of IMV. A lower PEEP strategy could be beneficial in the first phase of ARDS in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8310399/ /pubmed/34337327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42399-021-01031-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Covid-19
Ceruti, Samuele
Roncador, Marco
Saporito, Andrea
Biggiogero, Maira
Glotta, Andrea
Maida, Pier Andrea
Urso, Patrizia
Bona, Giovanni
Garzoni, Christian
Mauri, Romano
Borgeat, Alain
Low PEEP Mechanical Ventilation and PaO(2)/FiO(2) Ratio Evolution in COVID-19 Patients
title Low PEEP Mechanical Ventilation and PaO(2)/FiO(2) Ratio Evolution in COVID-19 Patients
title_full Low PEEP Mechanical Ventilation and PaO(2)/FiO(2) Ratio Evolution in COVID-19 Patients
title_fullStr Low PEEP Mechanical Ventilation and PaO(2)/FiO(2) Ratio Evolution in COVID-19 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Low PEEP Mechanical Ventilation and PaO(2)/FiO(2) Ratio Evolution in COVID-19 Patients
title_short Low PEEP Mechanical Ventilation and PaO(2)/FiO(2) Ratio Evolution in COVID-19 Patients
title_sort low peep mechanical ventilation and pao(2)/fio(2) ratio evolution in covid-19 patients
topic Covid-19
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42399-021-01031-x
work_keys_str_mv AT cerutisamuele lowpeepmechanicalventilationandpao2fio2ratioevolutionincovid19patients
AT roncadormarco lowpeepmechanicalventilationandpao2fio2ratioevolutionincovid19patients
AT saporitoandrea lowpeepmechanicalventilationandpao2fio2ratioevolutionincovid19patients
AT biggiogeromaira lowpeepmechanicalventilationandpao2fio2ratioevolutionincovid19patients
AT glottaandrea lowpeepmechanicalventilationandpao2fio2ratioevolutionincovid19patients
AT maidapierandrea lowpeepmechanicalventilationandpao2fio2ratioevolutionincovid19patients
AT ursopatrizia lowpeepmechanicalventilationandpao2fio2ratioevolutionincovid19patients
AT bonagiovanni lowpeepmechanicalventilationandpao2fio2ratioevolutionincovid19patients
AT garzonichristian lowpeepmechanicalventilationandpao2fio2ratioevolutionincovid19patients
AT mauriromano lowpeepmechanicalventilationandpao2fio2ratioevolutionincovid19patients
AT borgeatalain lowpeepmechanicalventilationandpao2fio2ratioevolutionincovid19patients