Cargando…
Elastic deformation of the mandibular jaw revisited—a clinical comparison between digital and conventional impressions using a reference
OBJECTIVES: Due to the partly strongly differing results in the literature, the aim of the present study was to investigate a possible deformation of the mandible during mouth opening using an intraoral scanner (IOS) and a conventional impression for comparison with a reference aid. MATERIALS AND ME...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33442777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03777-z |
_version_ | 1783728769859584000 |
---|---|
author | Schmidt, Alexander Klussmann, Leona Schlenz, Maximiliane A. Wöstmann, Bernd |
author_facet | Schmidt, Alexander Klussmann, Leona Schlenz, Maximiliane A. Wöstmann, Bernd |
author_sort | Schmidt, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Due to the partly strongly differing results in the literature, the aim of the present study was to investigate a possible deformation of the mandible during mouth opening using an intraoral scanner (IOS) and a conventional impression for comparison with a reference aid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four steel spheres were reversibly luted in the mandibular (n = 50) with a metallic reference aid at maximum mouth opening (MMO). Two digital impressions (Trios3), at MMO and at slightly mouth opening SMO and a conventional impression (Impregum), were taken as the measuring accuracy of the reference structure was already known. Difference between MMO-SMO for digital impressions and deviations between digital and conventional (SMO) were calculated. Furthermore, the angle between the normal vectors of two constructed planes was measured. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS25. RESULTS: Deviations for linear distances ranged from −1 ± 3 μm up to 17 ± 78 μm (digital impressions, MMO-SMO), from 19 ± 16 μm up to 132 ± 90 μm (digital impressions, SMO), and from 28 ± 17 μm up to 60 ± 52 μm (conventional impressions, SMO). There were no significant differences for digital impressions (MMO-SMO), and there were significant differences between the conventional and digital impressions at SMO. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the present study, no mandibular deformation could be detected during mouth opening with regard to the digital impressions. The results were rather within the measuring tolerance of the intraoral scanner. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on the present study, no deformation of the mandibular during mouth opening could be observed at the level previously assumed. Therewith related, dental techniques related to a possible mandibular deformation therefore should be reconsidered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8310469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83104692021-07-27 Elastic deformation of the mandibular jaw revisited—a clinical comparison between digital and conventional impressions using a reference Schmidt, Alexander Klussmann, Leona Schlenz, Maximiliane A. Wöstmann, Bernd Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: Due to the partly strongly differing results in the literature, the aim of the present study was to investigate a possible deformation of the mandible during mouth opening using an intraoral scanner (IOS) and a conventional impression for comparison with a reference aid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four steel spheres were reversibly luted in the mandibular (n = 50) with a metallic reference aid at maximum mouth opening (MMO). Two digital impressions (Trios3), at MMO and at slightly mouth opening SMO and a conventional impression (Impregum), were taken as the measuring accuracy of the reference structure was already known. Difference between MMO-SMO for digital impressions and deviations between digital and conventional (SMO) were calculated. Furthermore, the angle between the normal vectors of two constructed planes was measured. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS25. RESULTS: Deviations for linear distances ranged from −1 ± 3 μm up to 17 ± 78 μm (digital impressions, MMO-SMO), from 19 ± 16 μm up to 132 ± 90 μm (digital impressions, SMO), and from 28 ± 17 μm up to 60 ± 52 μm (conventional impressions, SMO). There were no significant differences for digital impressions (MMO-SMO), and there were significant differences between the conventional and digital impressions at SMO. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the present study, no mandibular deformation could be detected during mouth opening with regard to the digital impressions. The results were rather within the measuring tolerance of the intraoral scanner. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on the present study, no deformation of the mandibular during mouth opening could be observed at the level previously assumed. Therewith related, dental techniques related to a possible mandibular deformation therefore should be reconsidered. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8310469/ /pubmed/33442777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03777-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Schmidt, Alexander Klussmann, Leona Schlenz, Maximiliane A. Wöstmann, Bernd Elastic deformation of the mandibular jaw revisited—a clinical comparison between digital and conventional impressions using a reference |
title | Elastic deformation of the mandibular jaw revisited—a clinical comparison between digital and conventional impressions using a reference |
title_full | Elastic deformation of the mandibular jaw revisited—a clinical comparison between digital and conventional impressions using a reference |
title_fullStr | Elastic deformation of the mandibular jaw revisited—a clinical comparison between digital and conventional impressions using a reference |
title_full_unstemmed | Elastic deformation of the mandibular jaw revisited—a clinical comparison between digital and conventional impressions using a reference |
title_short | Elastic deformation of the mandibular jaw revisited—a clinical comparison between digital and conventional impressions using a reference |
title_sort | elastic deformation of the mandibular jaw revisited—a clinical comparison between digital and conventional impressions using a reference |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33442777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03777-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidtalexander elasticdeformationofthemandibularjawrevisitedaclinicalcomparisonbetweendigitalandconventionalimpressionsusingareference AT klussmannleona elasticdeformationofthemandibularjawrevisitedaclinicalcomparisonbetweendigitalandconventionalimpressionsusingareference AT schlenzmaximilianea elasticdeformationofthemandibularjawrevisitedaclinicalcomparisonbetweendigitalandconventionalimpressionsusingareference AT wostmannbernd elasticdeformationofthemandibularjawrevisitedaclinicalcomparisonbetweendigitalandconventionalimpressionsusingareference |