Cargando…

Can cryoprevention of oral mucositis be obtained at a higher temperature?

OBJECTIVES: Ice chips (IC) have successfully been used to prevent the development of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM). Although effective, IC entails several shortcomings and may open avenues for systemic infections as the water used may be contaminated by microorganisms, which may jeopardis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahdi, A., Stübner, J., Bergling, M., Jontell, M., Walladbegi, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03765-9
_version_ 1783728771041329152
author Mahdi, A.
Stübner, J.
Bergling, M.
Jontell, M.
Walladbegi, J.
author_facet Mahdi, A.
Stübner, J.
Bergling, M.
Jontell, M.
Walladbegi, J.
author_sort Mahdi, A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Ice chips (IC) have successfully been used to prevent the development of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM). Although effective, IC entails several shortcomings and may open avenues for systemic infections as the water used may be contaminated by microorganisms, which may jeopardise the medical rehabilitation of an already immunosuppressed patient. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability profile of a novel intraoral cooling device (ICD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In total, 20 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this randomised crossover study. Intraoral temperatures were registered using an IR camera, at baseline and following 30 and 60 min of cooling with the ICD, set to 8 °C or 15 °C. Following each cooling session, tolerability was assessed using a questionnaire. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in the intraoral temperature was observed using 8 °C compared with 15 °C, following both 30 (1.87 °C, p < 0.001) and 60 min (2.48 °C, p < 0.001) of cooling. Thus, the difference of the intraoral temperatures was less than the 7 °C difference between 8 °C and 15 °C. Furthermore, 60 min of cooling with 15 °C compared with 8 °C was better tolerated and preferred by 15 out of 20 participants (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cooling was better tolerated when the ICD was set to 15 °C compared with 8 °C, although the difference in reduction of the intraoral mucosal temperature was marginal and may not affect cryoprevention of oral mucositis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The ICD has the potential to improve the care for patients with cancer at high risk of developing OM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8310475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83104752021-07-27 Can cryoprevention of oral mucositis be obtained at a higher temperature? Mahdi, A. Stübner, J. Bergling, M. Jontell, M. Walladbegi, J. Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: Ice chips (IC) have successfully been used to prevent the development of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM). Although effective, IC entails several shortcomings and may open avenues for systemic infections as the water used may be contaminated by microorganisms, which may jeopardise the medical rehabilitation of an already immunosuppressed patient. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability profile of a novel intraoral cooling device (ICD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In total, 20 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this randomised crossover study. Intraoral temperatures were registered using an IR camera, at baseline and following 30 and 60 min of cooling with the ICD, set to 8 °C or 15 °C. Following each cooling session, tolerability was assessed using a questionnaire. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in the intraoral temperature was observed using 8 °C compared with 15 °C, following both 30 (1.87 °C, p < 0.001) and 60 min (2.48 °C, p < 0.001) of cooling. Thus, the difference of the intraoral temperatures was less than the 7 °C difference between 8 °C and 15 °C. Furthermore, 60 min of cooling with 15 °C compared with 8 °C was better tolerated and preferred by 15 out of 20 participants (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cooling was better tolerated when the ICD was set to 15 °C compared with 8 °C, although the difference in reduction of the intraoral mucosal temperature was marginal and may not affect cryoprevention of oral mucositis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The ICD has the potential to improve the care for patients with cancer at high risk of developing OM. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8310475/ /pubmed/33420829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03765-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Mahdi, A.
Stübner, J.
Bergling, M.
Jontell, M.
Walladbegi, J.
Can cryoprevention of oral mucositis be obtained at a higher temperature?
title Can cryoprevention of oral mucositis be obtained at a higher temperature?
title_full Can cryoprevention of oral mucositis be obtained at a higher temperature?
title_fullStr Can cryoprevention of oral mucositis be obtained at a higher temperature?
title_full_unstemmed Can cryoprevention of oral mucositis be obtained at a higher temperature?
title_short Can cryoprevention of oral mucositis be obtained at a higher temperature?
title_sort can cryoprevention of oral mucositis be obtained at a higher temperature?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03765-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mahdia cancryopreventionoforalmucositisbeobtainedatahighertemperature
AT stubnerj cancryopreventionoforalmucositisbeobtainedatahighertemperature
AT berglingm cancryopreventionoforalmucositisbeobtainedatahighertemperature
AT jontellm cancryopreventionoforalmucositisbeobtainedatahighertemperature
AT walladbegij cancryopreventionoforalmucositisbeobtainedatahighertemperature