Cargando…

WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact

QUESTION: There is a large worldwide gap between the service need and provision for mental, neurological and substance use disorders. WHO’s Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) intervention guide (IG), provides evidence-based guidance and tools for assessment and integrated management of prior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keynejad, Roxanne, Spagnolo, Jessica, Thornicroft, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33903119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300254
_version_ 1783728892540878848
author Keynejad, Roxanne
Spagnolo, Jessica
Thornicroft, Graham
author_facet Keynejad, Roxanne
Spagnolo, Jessica
Thornicroft, Graham
author_sort Keynejad, Roxanne
collection PubMed
description QUESTION: There is a large worldwide gap between the service need and provision for mental, neurological and substance use disorders. WHO’s Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) intervention guide (IG), provides evidence-based guidance and tools for assessment and integrated management of priority disorders. Our 2017 systematic review identified 33 peer-reviewed studies describing mhGAP-IG implementation in low-income and middle-income countries. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS, ScieELO, Cochrane, PubMed databases, 3ie, Google Scholar and citations of our review, on 24 November 2020. We sought evidence, experience and evaluations of the mhGAP-IG, app or mhGAP Humanitarian IG, from any country, in any language. We extracted data from included papers, but heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis. FINDINGS: Of 2621 results, 162 new papers reported applications of the mhGAP-IG. They described mhGAP training courses (59 references), clinical applications (n=49), research uses (n=27), contextual adaptations (n=13), economic studies (n=7) and other educational applications (n=7). Most were conducted in the African region (40%) and South-East Asia (25%). Studies demonstrated improved knowledge, attitudes and confidence post-training and improved symptoms and engagement with care, post-implementation. Research studies compared mhGAP-IG-enhanced usual care with task-shared psychological interventions and adaptation studies optimised mhGAP-IG implementation for different contexts. Economic studies calculated human resource requirements of scaling up mhGAP-IG implementation and other educational studies explored its potential for repurposing. CONCLUSIONS: The diverse, expanding global mhGAP-IG literature demonstrates substantial impact on training, patient care, research and practice. Priorities for future research should be less-studied regions, severe mental illness and contextual adaptation of brief psychological interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8311089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83110892021-08-13 WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact Keynejad, Roxanne Spagnolo, Jessica Thornicroft, Graham Evid Based Ment Health Systematic Review QUESTION: There is a large worldwide gap between the service need and provision for mental, neurological and substance use disorders. WHO’s Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) intervention guide (IG), provides evidence-based guidance and tools for assessment and integrated management of priority disorders. Our 2017 systematic review identified 33 peer-reviewed studies describing mhGAP-IG implementation in low-income and middle-income countries. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS, ScieELO, Cochrane, PubMed databases, 3ie, Google Scholar and citations of our review, on 24 November 2020. We sought evidence, experience and evaluations of the mhGAP-IG, app or mhGAP Humanitarian IG, from any country, in any language. We extracted data from included papers, but heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis. FINDINGS: Of 2621 results, 162 new papers reported applications of the mhGAP-IG. They described mhGAP training courses (59 references), clinical applications (n=49), research uses (n=27), contextual adaptations (n=13), economic studies (n=7) and other educational applications (n=7). Most were conducted in the African region (40%) and South-East Asia (25%). Studies demonstrated improved knowledge, attitudes and confidence post-training and improved symptoms and engagement with care, post-implementation. Research studies compared mhGAP-IG-enhanced usual care with task-shared psychological interventions and adaptation studies optimised mhGAP-IG implementation for different contexts. Economic studies calculated human resource requirements of scaling up mhGAP-IG implementation and other educational studies explored its potential for repurposing. CONCLUSIONS: The diverse, expanding global mhGAP-IG literature demonstrates substantial impact on training, patient care, research and practice. Priorities for future research should be less-studied regions, severe mental illness and contextual adaptation of brief psychological interventions. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8311089/ /pubmed/33903119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300254 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Keynejad, Roxanne
Spagnolo, Jessica
Thornicroft, Graham
WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact
title WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact
title_full WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact
title_fullStr WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact
title_full_unstemmed WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact
title_short WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact
title_sort who mental health gap action programme (mhgap) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33903119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300254
work_keys_str_mv AT keynejadroxanne whomentalhealthgapactionprogrammemhgapinterventionguideupdatedsystematicreviewonevidenceandimpact
AT spagnolojessica whomentalhealthgapactionprogrammemhgapinterventionguideupdatedsystematicreviewonevidenceandimpact
AT thornicroftgraham whomentalhealthgapactionprogrammemhgapinterventionguideupdatedsystematicreviewonevidenceandimpact