Cargando…

Clinical teachers’ motivations for feedback provision in busy emergency departments: a multicentre qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Feedback is an effective pedagogical tool in clinical teaching and learning, but the actual perception by learners of clinical feedback is often described as unsatisfactory. Unlike assessment feedback or teaching sessions, which often happen within protected time and space, clinical feed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaou, Chung-Hsien, Yu, Shiuan-Ruey, Ngerng, Roy Yi Ling, Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie, Chang, Li-Chun, Chang, Yu-Che
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-208908
_version_ 1783728895369936896
author Chaou, Chung-Hsien
Yu, Shiuan-Ruey
Ngerng, Roy Yi Ling
Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie
Chang, Li-Chun
Chang, Yu-Che
author_facet Chaou, Chung-Hsien
Yu, Shiuan-Ruey
Ngerng, Roy Yi Ling
Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie
Chang, Li-Chun
Chang, Yu-Che
author_sort Chaou, Chung-Hsien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Feedback is an effective pedagogical tool in clinical teaching and learning, but the actual perception by learners of clinical feedback is often described as unsatisfactory. Unlike assessment feedback or teaching sessions, which often happen within protected time and space, clinical feedback is influenced by numerous clinical factors. Little is known about clinical teachers’ motivations to provide feedback in busy clinical settings. We aimed to investigate the motivations behind feedback being given in emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: A qualitative analysis of semi-structured interview data was conducted between August 2015 and June 2016. Eighteen attending physicians were purposively sampled from three teaching hospital EDs in Taiwan. Data were thematically analysed, both inductively (from the data) and deductively (using self-determination theory (SDT)). Themes were mapped to the different motivation types identified by the SDT. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Despite working in busy clinical settings, Taiwanese ED clinical teachers reported being motivated to provide feedback when they felt responsible for their learners, when they understood the importance of feedback (patient safety and partner building), or simply because they were committed to following a tradition of passing on their clinical knowledge to their juniors. Suggestions to facilitate the internalisation of external motivations are proposed. CONCLUSIONS: In this qualitative study, motivations for clinical feedback were identified. Although the motivations are mostly extrinsic, the elicitation of internal motivation is possible once true satisfaction is fostered during the feedback-giving process. This understanding can be used to develop interventions to enable clinical feedback to be provided in a sustained manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8311103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83111032021-08-13 Clinical teachers’ motivations for feedback provision in busy emergency departments: a multicentre qualitative study Chaou, Chung-Hsien Yu, Shiuan-Ruey Ngerng, Roy Yi Ling Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie Chang, Li-Chun Chang, Yu-Che Emerg Med J Original Research BACKGROUND: Feedback is an effective pedagogical tool in clinical teaching and learning, but the actual perception by learners of clinical feedback is often described as unsatisfactory. Unlike assessment feedback or teaching sessions, which often happen within protected time and space, clinical feedback is influenced by numerous clinical factors. Little is known about clinical teachers’ motivations to provide feedback in busy clinical settings. We aimed to investigate the motivations behind feedback being given in emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: A qualitative analysis of semi-structured interview data was conducted between August 2015 and June 2016. Eighteen attending physicians were purposively sampled from three teaching hospital EDs in Taiwan. Data were thematically analysed, both inductively (from the data) and deductively (using self-determination theory (SDT)). Themes were mapped to the different motivation types identified by the SDT. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Despite working in busy clinical settings, Taiwanese ED clinical teachers reported being motivated to provide feedback when they felt responsible for their learners, when they understood the importance of feedback (patient safety and partner building), or simply because they were committed to following a tradition of passing on their clinical knowledge to their juniors. Suggestions to facilitate the internalisation of external motivations are proposed. CONCLUSIONS: In this qualitative study, motivations for clinical feedback were identified. Although the motivations are mostly extrinsic, the elicitation of internal motivation is possible once true satisfaction is fostered during the feedback-giving process. This understanding can be used to develop interventions to enable clinical feedback to be provided in a sustained manner. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8311103/ /pubmed/32847846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-208908 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Chaou, Chung-Hsien
Yu, Shiuan-Ruey
Ngerng, Roy Yi Ling
Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie
Chang, Li-Chun
Chang, Yu-Che
Clinical teachers’ motivations for feedback provision in busy emergency departments: a multicentre qualitative study
title Clinical teachers’ motivations for feedback provision in busy emergency departments: a multicentre qualitative study
title_full Clinical teachers’ motivations for feedback provision in busy emergency departments: a multicentre qualitative study
title_fullStr Clinical teachers’ motivations for feedback provision in busy emergency departments: a multicentre qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical teachers’ motivations for feedback provision in busy emergency departments: a multicentre qualitative study
title_short Clinical teachers’ motivations for feedback provision in busy emergency departments: a multicentre qualitative study
title_sort clinical teachers’ motivations for feedback provision in busy emergency departments: a multicentre qualitative study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-208908
work_keys_str_mv AT chaouchunghsien clinicalteachersmotivationsforfeedbackprovisioninbusyemergencydepartmentsamulticentrequalitativestudy
AT yushiuanruey clinicalteachersmotivationsforfeedbackprovisioninbusyemergencydepartmentsamulticentrequalitativestudy
AT ngerngroyyiling clinicalteachersmotivationsforfeedbackprovisioninbusyemergencydepartmentsamulticentrequalitativestudy
AT monrouxelynnvalerie clinicalteachersmotivationsforfeedbackprovisioninbusyemergencydepartmentsamulticentrequalitativestudy
AT changlichun clinicalteachersmotivationsforfeedbackprovisioninbusyemergencydepartmentsamulticentrequalitativestudy
AT changyuche clinicalteachersmotivationsforfeedbackprovisioninbusyemergencydepartmentsamulticentrequalitativestudy