Cargando…
Health Care Provider Utilization of Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the literature on the proportion of health care providers who access and use prescription monitoring program data in their practice, as well as associated barriers to the use of such data. DESIGN: We performed a systematic review using a standard systematic review method wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33484144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa412 |
_version_ | 1783728986578223104 |
---|---|
author | Robinson, Alysia Wilson, Maria N Hayden, Jill A Rhodes, Emily Campbell, Samuel MacDougall, Peter Asbridge, Mark |
author_facet | Robinson, Alysia Wilson, Maria N Hayden, Jill A Rhodes, Emily Campbell, Samuel MacDougall, Peter Asbridge, Mark |
author_sort | Robinson, Alysia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the literature on the proportion of health care providers who access and use prescription monitoring program data in their practice, as well as associated barriers to the use of such data. DESIGN: We performed a systematic review using a standard systematic review method with meta-analysis and qualitative meta-summary. We included full-published peer-reviewed reports of study data, as well as theses and dissertations. METHODS: We identified relevant quantitative and qualitative studies. We synthesized outcomes related to prescription monitoring program data use (i.e., ever used, frequency of use). We pooled the proportion of health care providers who had ever used prescription monitoring program data by using random effects models, and we used meta-summary methodology to identify prescription monitoring program use barriers. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies were included in our review, all from the United States. Of these, 46 reported on prescription monitoring program use and 32 reported on barriers. The pooled proportion of health care providers who had ever used prescription monitoring program data was 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.48–0.66). Common barriers to prescription monitoring program data use included time constraints and administrative burdens, low perceived value of prescription monitoring program data, and problems with prescription monitoring program system usability. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that health care providers underutilize prescription monitoring program data and that many barriers exist to prescription monitoring program data use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8311582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83115822021-07-27 Health Care Provider Utilization of Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Robinson, Alysia Wilson, Maria N Hayden, Jill A Rhodes, Emily Campbell, Samuel MacDougall, Peter Asbridge, Mark Pain Med Primary Care & Health Services Section OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the literature on the proportion of health care providers who access and use prescription monitoring program data in their practice, as well as associated barriers to the use of such data. DESIGN: We performed a systematic review using a standard systematic review method with meta-analysis and qualitative meta-summary. We included full-published peer-reviewed reports of study data, as well as theses and dissertations. METHODS: We identified relevant quantitative and qualitative studies. We synthesized outcomes related to prescription monitoring program data use (i.e., ever used, frequency of use). We pooled the proportion of health care providers who had ever used prescription monitoring program data by using random effects models, and we used meta-summary methodology to identify prescription monitoring program use barriers. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies were included in our review, all from the United States. Of these, 46 reported on prescription monitoring program use and 32 reported on barriers. The pooled proportion of health care providers who had ever used prescription monitoring program data was 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.48–0.66). Common barriers to prescription monitoring program data use included time constraints and administrative burdens, low perceived value of prescription monitoring program data, and problems with prescription monitoring program system usability. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that health care providers underutilize prescription monitoring program data and that many barriers exist to prescription monitoring program data use. Oxford University Press 2021-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8311582/ /pubmed/33484144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa412 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Primary Care & Health Services Section Robinson, Alysia Wilson, Maria N Hayden, Jill A Rhodes, Emily Campbell, Samuel MacDougall, Peter Asbridge, Mark Health Care Provider Utilization of Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Health Care Provider Utilization of Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Health Care Provider Utilization of Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Health Care Provider Utilization of Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Health Care Provider Utilization of Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Health Care Provider Utilization of Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | health care provider utilization of prescription monitoring programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Primary Care & Health Services Section |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33484144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robinsonalysia healthcareproviderutilizationofprescriptionmonitoringprogramsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wilsonmarian healthcareproviderutilizationofprescriptionmonitoringprogramsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haydenjilla healthcareproviderutilizationofprescriptionmonitoringprogramsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rhodesemily healthcareproviderutilizationofprescriptionmonitoringprogramsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT campbellsamuel healthcareproviderutilizationofprescriptionmonitoringprogramsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT macdougallpeter healthcareproviderutilizationofprescriptionmonitoringprogramsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT asbridgemark healthcareproviderutilizationofprescriptionmonitoringprogramsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |