Cargando…
To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection
The regulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and telomeres are diametrically opposed in the cell. DSBs are considered one of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage and must be quickly recognized and repaired. Telomeres, on the other hand, are specialized, stable DNA ends that must be protecte...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.708763 |
_version_ | 1783729019573764096 |
---|---|
author | Ackerson, Stephanie M. Romney, Carlan Schuck, P. Logan Stewart, Jason A. |
author_facet | Ackerson, Stephanie M. Romney, Carlan Schuck, P. Logan Stewart, Jason A. |
author_sort | Ackerson, Stephanie M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The regulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and telomeres are diametrically opposed in the cell. DSBs are considered one of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage and must be quickly recognized and repaired. Telomeres, on the other hand, are specialized, stable DNA ends that must be protected from recognition as DSBs to inhibit unwanted chromosome fusions. Decisions to join DNA ends, or not, are therefore critical to genome stability. Yet, the processing of telomeres and DSBs share many commonalities. Accordingly, key decision points are used to shift DNA ends toward DSB repair vs. end protection. Additionally, DSBs can be repaired by two major pathways, namely homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The choice of which repair pathway is employed is also dictated by a series of decision points that shift the break toward HR or NHEJ. In this review, we will focus on these decision points and the mechanisms that dictate end protection vs. DSB repair and DSB repair choice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8311741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83117412021-07-27 To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection Ackerson, Stephanie M. Romney, Carlan Schuck, P. Logan Stewart, Jason A. Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology The regulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and telomeres are diametrically opposed in the cell. DSBs are considered one of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage and must be quickly recognized and repaired. Telomeres, on the other hand, are specialized, stable DNA ends that must be protected from recognition as DSBs to inhibit unwanted chromosome fusions. Decisions to join DNA ends, or not, are therefore critical to genome stability. Yet, the processing of telomeres and DSBs share many commonalities. Accordingly, key decision points are used to shift DNA ends toward DSB repair vs. end protection. Additionally, DSBs can be repaired by two major pathways, namely homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The choice of which repair pathway is employed is also dictated by a series of decision points that shift the break toward HR or NHEJ. In this review, we will focus on these decision points and the mechanisms that dictate end protection vs. DSB repair and DSB repair choice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8311741/ /pubmed/34322492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.708763 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ackerson, Romney, Schuck and Stewart. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cell and Developmental Biology Ackerson, Stephanie M. Romney, Carlan Schuck, P. Logan Stewart, Jason A. To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection |
title | To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection |
title_full | To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection |
title_fullStr | To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection |
title_full_unstemmed | To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection |
title_short | To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection |
title_sort | to join or not to join: decision points along the pathway to double-strand break repair vs. chromosome end protection |
topic | Cell and Developmental Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.708763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ackersonstephaniem tojoinornottojoindecisionpointsalongthepathwaytodoublestrandbreakrepairvschromosomeendprotection AT romneycarlan tojoinornottojoindecisionpointsalongthepathwaytodoublestrandbreakrepairvschromosomeendprotection AT schuckplogan tojoinornottojoindecisionpointsalongthepathwaytodoublestrandbreakrepairvschromosomeendprotection AT stewartjasona tojoinornottojoindecisionpointsalongthepathwaytodoublestrandbreakrepairvschromosomeendprotection |