Cargando…

To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection

The regulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and telomeres are diametrically opposed in the cell. DSBs are considered one of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage and must be quickly recognized and repaired. Telomeres, on the other hand, are specialized, stable DNA ends that must be protecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ackerson, Stephanie M., Romney, Carlan, Schuck, P. Logan, Stewart, Jason A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322492
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.708763
_version_ 1783729019573764096
author Ackerson, Stephanie M.
Romney, Carlan
Schuck, P. Logan
Stewart, Jason A.
author_facet Ackerson, Stephanie M.
Romney, Carlan
Schuck, P. Logan
Stewart, Jason A.
author_sort Ackerson, Stephanie M.
collection PubMed
description The regulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and telomeres are diametrically opposed in the cell. DSBs are considered one of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage and must be quickly recognized and repaired. Telomeres, on the other hand, are specialized, stable DNA ends that must be protected from recognition as DSBs to inhibit unwanted chromosome fusions. Decisions to join DNA ends, or not, are therefore critical to genome stability. Yet, the processing of telomeres and DSBs share many commonalities. Accordingly, key decision points are used to shift DNA ends toward DSB repair vs. end protection. Additionally, DSBs can be repaired by two major pathways, namely homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The choice of which repair pathway is employed is also dictated by a series of decision points that shift the break toward HR or NHEJ. In this review, we will focus on these decision points and the mechanisms that dictate end protection vs. DSB repair and DSB repair choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8311741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83117412021-07-27 To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection Ackerson, Stephanie M. Romney, Carlan Schuck, P. Logan Stewart, Jason A. Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology The regulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and telomeres are diametrically opposed in the cell. DSBs are considered one of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage and must be quickly recognized and repaired. Telomeres, on the other hand, are specialized, stable DNA ends that must be protected from recognition as DSBs to inhibit unwanted chromosome fusions. Decisions to join DNA ends, or not, are therefore critical to genome stability. Yet, the processing of telomeres and DSBs share many commonalities. Accordingly, key decision points are used to shift DNA ends toward DSB repair vs. end protection. Additionally, DSBs can be repaired by two major pathways, namely homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The choice of which repair pathway is employed is also dictated by a series of decision points that shift the break toward HR or NHEJ. In this review, we will focus on these decision points and the mechanisms that dictate end protection vs. DSB repair and DSB repair choice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8311741/ /pubmed/34322492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.708763 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ackerson, Romney, Schuck and Stewart. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cell and Developmental Biology
Ackerson, Stephanie M.
Romney, Carlan
Schuck, P. Logan
Stewart, Jason A.
To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection
title To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection
title_full To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection
title_fullStr To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection
title_full_unstemmed To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection
title_short To Join or Not to Join: Decision Points Along the Pathway to Double-Strand Break Repair vs. Chromosome End Protection
title_sort to join or not to join: decision points along the pathway to double-strand break repair vs. chromosome end protection
topic Cell and Developmental Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322492
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.708763
work_keys_str_mv AT ackersonstephaniem tojoinornottojoindecisionpointsalongthepathwaytodoublestrandbreakrepairvschromosomeendprotection
AT romneycarlan tojoinornottojoindecisionpointsalongthepathwaytodoublestrandbreakrepairvschromosomeendprotection
AT schuckplogan tojoinornottojoindecisionpointsalongthepathwaytodoublestrandbreakrepairvschromosomeendprotection
AT stewartjasona tojoinornottojoindecisionpointsalongthepathwaytodoublestrandbreakrepairvschromosomeendprotection