Cargando…

Sensory Perception in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy with Radicular Pain: Feasibility Study of Multimodal Bedside-Suitable Somatosensory Testing

BACKGROUND: Somatosensory testing could be useful in stratifying pain patients and improving pain treatment guidelines. Bedside-suitable techniques are searched for application in daily clinical practice. This study aimed to characterize chronic unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaitkus, Alfredas, Šipylaitė, Jūratė
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Vilnius University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393632
http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2021.28.1.18
_version_ 1783729040574644224
author Vaitkus, Alfredas
Šipylaitė, Jūratė
author_facet Vaitkus, Alfredas
Šipylaitė, Jūratė
author_sort Vaitkus, Alfredas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Somatosensory testing could be useful in stratifying pain patients and improving pain treatment guidelines. Bedside-suitable techniques are searched for application in daily clinical practice. This study aimed to characterize chronic unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) patients with radicular pain using multimodal bedside-suitable somatosensory testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 50 chronic unilateral LSR patients with radicular pain (LSR group) and 24 controls (Control group). Sensory testing was performed using a battery of bedside sensory tests (10g monofilament, 200–400 mN brush, Lindblom rollers with controlled 25°C and 40°C temperature, and 40g neurological pin and investigator’s finger pressure). Participants had to rate their sensory perceptions on both legs at multiple test points within L3 to S2 dermatomes. Characteristics of the testing process and sensory disturbances were analyzed. RESULTS: LSR group showed sensory disturbances in 82% of patients. The Control group showed no sensory disturbances. Sensory testing took longer (p < 0.001) in the LSR group (29.3 ± 6.5 minutes per patient) than in the Control group (20.5 ± 5.2). Nine sensory phenotypes were detected in the LSR group according to individual sensory disturbances within 5 superficial tests. CONCLUSIONS: The applied multimodal bedside-suitable somatosensory testing battery is suitable for sensory evaluation and characterization of LSR patients. Grouping of allied sensory phenotypes revealed some tendencies in pain intensity characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8311840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Vilnius University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83118402021-08-13 Sensory Perception in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy with Radicular Pain: Feasibility Study of Multimodal Bedside-Suitable Somatosensory Testing Vaitkus, Alfredas Šipylaitė, Jūratė Acta Med Litu Review Papers BACKGROUND: Somatosensory testing could be useful in stratifying pain patients and improving pain treatment guidelines. Bedside-suitable techniques are searched for application in daily clinical practice. This study aimed to characterize chronic unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) patients with radicular pain using multimodal bedside-suitable somatosensory testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 50 chronic unilateral LSR patients with radicular pain (LSR group) and 24 controls (Control group). Sensory testing was performed using a battery of bedside sensory tests (10g monofilament, 200–400 mN brush, Lindblom rollers with controlled 25°C and 40°C temperature, and 40g neurological pin and investigator’s finger pressure). Participants had to rate their sensory perceptions on both legs at multiple test points within L3 to S2 dermatomes. Characteristics of the testing process and sensory disturbances were analyzed. RESULTS: LSR group showed sensory disturbances in 82% of patients. The Control group showed no sensory disturbances. Sensory testing took longer (p < 0.001) in the LSR group (29.3 ± 6.5 minutes per patient) than in the Control group (20.5 ± 5.2). Nine sensory phenotypes were detected in the LSR group according to individual sensory disturbances within 5 superficial tests. CONCLUSIONS: The applied multimodal bedside-suitable somatosensory testing battery is suitable for sensory evaluation and characterization of LSR patients. Grouping of allied sensory phenotypes revealed some tendencies in pain intensity characteristics. Vilnius University Press 2021 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8311840/ /pubmed/34393632 http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2021.28.1.18 Text en Copyright © 2021 Alfredas Vaitkus, Jūratė Šipylaitė. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Papers
Vaitkus, Alfredas
Šipylaitė, Jūratė
Sensory Perception in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy with Radicular Pain: Feasibility Study of Multimodal Bedside-Suitable Somatosensory Testing
title Sensory Perception in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy with Radicular Pain: Feasibility Study of Multimodal Bedside-Suitable Somatosensory Testing
title_full Sensory Perception in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy with Radicular Pain: Feasibility Study of Multimodal Bedside-Suitable Somatosensory Testing
title_fullStr Sensory Perception in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy with Radicular Pain: Feasibility Study of Multimodal Bedside-Suitable Somatosensory Testing
title_full_unstemmed Sensory Perception in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy with Radicular Pain: Feasibility Study of Multimodal Bedside-Suitable Somatosensory Testing
title_short Sensory Perception in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy with Radicular Pain: Feasibility Study of Multimodal Bedside-Suitable Somatosensory Testing
title_sort sensory perception in lumbosacral radiculopathy with radicular pain: feasibility study of multimodal bedside-suitable somatosensory testing
topic Review Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393632
http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2021.28.1.18
work_keys_str_mv AT vaitkusalfredas sensoryperceptioninlumbosacralradiculopathywithradicularpainfeasibilitystudyofmultimodalbedsidesuitablesomatosensorytesting
AT sipylaitejurate sensoryperceptioninlumbosacralradiculopathywithradicularpainfeasibilitystudyofmultimodalbedsidesuitablesomatosensorytesting