Cargando…
Incidental Detection of Preputial Calculus in a Patient with Partial Phimosis: Is it as Rare as We Believed?
SUMMARY. BACKGROUND: Preputial stone disease is the rarest type of urolithiasis. Adult males with severe phimosis and poor hygiene are mainly affected. CASE PRESENTATION: A 90-year-old male sought treatment for steadily worsening urinary frequency, intermittency, incontinence, and pain at the tip of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Vilnius University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393645 http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2021.28.1.10 |
_version_ | 1783729042494586880 |
---|---|
author | Symeonidis, Evangelos N. Toutziaris, Chrysovalantis Katsimantas, Antonios Dimitriadis, Georgios |
author_facet | Symeonidis, Evangelos N. Toutziaris, Chrysovalantis Katsimantas, Antonios Dimitriadis, Georgios |
author_sort | Symeonidis, Evangelos N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SUMMARY. BACKGROUND: Preputial stone disease is the rarest type of urolithiasis. Adult males with severe phimosis and poor hygiene are mainly affected. CASE PRESENTATION: A 90-year-old male sought treatment for steadily worsening urinary frequency, intermittency, incontinence, and pain at the tip of his penis of 3-days duration. Clinical examination revealed a palpable distended urinary bladder, a partial phimosis and a round, hard on palpation, and partly ulcerative lesion at the tip of the foreskin. A single, 1 cm in maximum diameter stone, was incidentally discovered beneath the prepuce and subsequently removed from the preputial sac. The patient refused further treatment with circumcision, and opted for conservative therapy of benign prostate hyperplasia. CONCLUSION: Personal hygiene remains the cornerstone in the prevention of the preputial calculi formation, while circumcision represents the mainstay of treatment for definite stone removal and elimination of the precipitating causes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8311848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Vilnius University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83118482021-08-13 Incidental Detection of Preputial Calculus in a Patient with Partial Phimosis: Is it as Rare as We Believed? Symeonidis, Evangelos N. Toutziaris, Chrysovalantis Katsimantas, Antonios Dimitriadis, Georgios Acta Med Litu Case Studies SUMMARY. BACKGROUND: Preputial stone disease is the rarest type of urolithiasis. Adult males with severe phimosis and poor hygiene are mainly affected. CASE PRESENTATION: A 90-year-old male sought treatment for steadily worsening urinary frequency, intermittency, incontinence, and pain at the tip of his penis of 3-days duration. Clinical examination revealed a palpable distended urinary bladder, a partial phimosis and a round, hard on palpation, and partly ulcerative lesion at the tip of the foreskin. A single, 1 cm in maximum diameter stone, was incidentally discovered beneath the prepuce and subsequently removed from the preputial sac. The patient refused further treatment with circumcision, and opted for conservative therapy of benign prostate hyperplasia. CONCLUSION: Personal hygiene remains the cornerstone in the prevention of the preputial calculi formation, while circumcision represents the mainstay of treatment for definite stone removal and elimination of the precipitating causes. Vilnius University Press 2021 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8311848/ /pubmed/34393645 http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2021.28.1.10 Text en Copyright © 2021 Evangelos N. Symeonidis, Chrysovalantis Toutziaris, Antonios Katsimantas, Georgios Dimitriadis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Case Studies Symeonidis, Evangelos N. Toutziaris, Chrysovalantis Katsimantas, Antonios Dimitriadis, Georgios Incidental Detection of Preputial Calculus in a Patient with Partial Phimosis: Is it as Rare as We Believed? |
title | Incidental Detection of Preputial Calculus in a Patient with Partial Phimosis: Is it as Rare as We Believed? |
title_full | Incidental Detection of Preputial Calculus in a Patient with Partial Phimosis: Is it as Rare as We Believed? |
title_fullStr | Incidental Detection of Preputial Calculus in a Patient with Partial Phimosis: Is it as Rare as We Believed? |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidental Detection of Preputial Calculus in a Patient with Partial Phimosis: Is it as Rare as We Believed? |
title_short | Incidental Detection of Preputial Calculus in a Patient with Partial Phimosis: Is it as Rare as We Believed? |
title_sort | incidental detection of preputial calculus in a patient with partial phimosis: is it as rare as we believed? |
topic | Case Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393645 http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2021.28.1.10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT symeonidisevangelosn incidentaldetectionofpreputialcalculusinapatientwithpartialphimosisisitasrareaswebelieved AT toutziarischrysovalantis incidentaldetectionofpreputialcalculusinapatientwithpartialphimosisisitasrareaswebelieved AT katsimantasantonios incidentaldetectionofpreputialcalculusinapatientwithpartialphimosisisitasrareaswebelieved AT dimitriadisgeorgios incidentaldetectionofpreputialcalculusinapatientwithpartialphimosisisitasrareaswebelieved |