Cargando…

To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a rare event, with high numbers of patients unnecessarily immobilised with no potential benefit based on limited evidence from the 1950s and 1960s. Contemporary opinion now challenges the notion that traditional immobilisation prevents movement and protects th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Lee, Shaw, Gary, Bates, Charlotte, Hawkins, Christopher, McClelland, Graham, McMeekin, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The College of Paramedics 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335099
http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.38
_version_ 1783729131619352576
author Thompson, Lee
Shaw, Gary
Bates, Charlotte
Hawkins, Christopher
McClelland, Graham
McMeekin, Peter
author_facet Thompson, Lee
Shaw, Gary
Bates, Charlotte
Hawkins, Christopher
McClelland, Graham
McMeekin, Peter
author_sort Thompson, Lee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a rare event, with high numbers of patients unnecessarily immobilised with no potential benefit based on limited evidence from the 1950s and 1960s. Contemporary opinion now challenges the notion that traditional immobilisation prevents movement and protects the spine. Current literature suggests that these methods which include semi-rigid collars can potentially cause more movement of the spine and harm the patient. The purpose of this study was to explore the views and perspectives of pre-hospital care providers on immobilising patients without the use of a semi-rigid collar. METHODS: Focus groups were used to allow individuals to discuss and comment on a new method of immobilisation which omits the semi-rigid collar and to capture the thoughts, feelings and experiences of participants. Thematic analysis of the coded transcriptions was used to identify emerging themes. RESULTS: Three focus groups were conducted with 15 participants in each. Participants were all exposed to patients sustaining trauma within their professional roles. Six intertwined themes emerged from the analysis: communication, conflict, education/training, empowerment, risk and the patient. Woven between these themes are the complex interactions that bring together the inter-professional relationships with other emergency services and hospital staff, the patient, the public and pre-hospital care providers. DISCUSSION: Existing immobilisation practices are being challenged, with clinicians empowered to tailor practice to meet specific patient needs. There is limited empirical evidence to support current immobilisation practices. Contemporary literature suggests current practices may potentially cause harm. New pragmatic immobilisation practices are gradually being adopted by some pre-hospital care providers. CONCLUSION: This study explored the perspectives of pre-hospital care providers on immobilising patients without the use of a semi-rigid collar for potential SCI. The consensus of the participants supports a pragmatic approach to managing potential SCI that provides safe, high-quality patient-centred care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8312363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The College of Paramedics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83123632022-05-01 To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study Thompson, Lee Shaw, Gary Bates, Charlotte Hawkins, Christopher McClelland, Graham McMeekin, Peter Br Paramed J Original Research BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a rare event, with high numbers of patients unnecessarily immobilised with no potential benefit based on limited evidence from the 1950s and 1960s. Contemporary opinion now challenges the notion that traditional immobilisation prevents movement and protects the spine. Current literature suggests that these methods which include semi-rigid collars can potentially cause more movement of the spine and harm the patient. The purpose of this study was to explore the views and perspectives of pre-hospital care providers on immobilising patients without the use of a semi-rigid collar. METHODS: Focus groups were used to allow individuals to discuss and comment on a new method of immobilisation which omits the semi-rigid collar and to capture the thoughts, feelings and experiences of participants. Thematic analysis of the coded transcriptions was used to identify emerging themes. RESULTS: Three focus groups were conducted with 15 participants in each. Participants were all exposed to patients sustaining trauma within their professional roles. Six intertwined themes emerged from the analysis: communication, conflict, education/training, empowerment, risk and the patient. Woven between these themes are the complex interactions that bring together the inter-professional relationships with other emergency services and hospital staff, the patient, the public and pre-hospital care providers. DISCUSSION: Existing immobilisation practices are being challenged, with clinicians empowered to tailor practice to meet specific patient needs. There is limited empirical evidence to support current immobilisation practices. Contemporary literature suggests current practices may potentially cause harm. New pragmatic immobilisation practices are gradually being adopted by some pre-hospital care providers. CONCLUSION: This study explored the perspectives of pre-hospital care providers on immobilising patients without the use of a semi-rigid collar for potential SCI. The consensus of the participants supports a pragmatic approach to managing potential SCI that provides safe, high-quality patient-centred care. The College of Paramedics 2021-05-01 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8312363/ /pubmed/34335099 http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.38 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Thompson, Lee
Shaw, Gary
Bates, Charlotte
Hawkins, Christopher
McClelland, Graham
McMeekin, Peter
To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study
title To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study
title_full To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study
title_fullStr To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study
title_full_unstemmed To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study
title_short To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study
title_sort to collar or not to collar. views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335099
http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.38
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonlee tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy
AT shawgary tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy
AT batescharlotte tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy
AT hawkinschristopher tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy
AT mcclellandgraham tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy
AT mcmeekinpeter tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy