Cargando…
To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a rare event, with high numbers of patients unnecessarily immobilised with no potential benefit based on limited evidence from the 1950s and 1960s. Contemporary opinion now challenges the notion that traditional immobilisation prevents movement and protects th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The College of Paramedics
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335099 http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.38 |
_version_ | 1783729131619352576 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Lee Shaw, Gary Bates, Charlotte Hawkins, Christopher McClelland, Graham McMeekin, Peter |
author_facet | Thompson, Lee Shaw, Gary Bates, Charlotte Hawkins, Christopher McClelland, Graham McMeekin, Peter |
author_sort | Thompson, Lee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a rare event, with high numbers of patients unnecessarily immobilised with no potential benefit based on limited evidence from the 1950s and 1960s. Contemporary opinion now challenges the notion that traditional immobilisation prevents movement and protects the spine. Current literature suggests that these methods which include semi-rigid collars can potentially cause more movement of the spine and harm the patient. The purpose of this study was to explore the views and perspectives of pre-hospital care providers on immobilising patients without the use of a semi-rigid collar. METHODS: Focus groups were used to allow individuals to discuss and comment on a new method of immobilisation which omits the semi-rigid collar and to capture the thoughts, feelings and experiences of participants. Thematic analysis of the coded transcriptions was used to identify emerging themes. RESULTS: Three focus groups were conducted with 15 participants in each. Participants were all exposed to patients sustaining trauma within their professional roles. Six intertwined themes emerged from the analysis: communication, conflict, education/training, empowerment, risk and the patient. Woven between these themes are the complex interactions that bring together the inter-professional relationships with other emergency services and hospital staff, the patient, the public and pre-hospital care providers. DISCUSSION: Existing immobilisation practices are being challenged, with clinicians empowered to tailor practice to meet specific patient needs. There is limited empirical evidence to support current immobilisation practices. Contemporary literature suggests current practices may potentially cause harm. New pragmatic immobilisation practices are gradually being adopted by some pre-hospital care providers. CONCLUSION: This study explored the perspectives of pre-hospital care providers on immobilising patients without the use of a semi-rigid collar for potential SCI. The consensus of the participants supports a pragmatic approach to managing potential SCI that provides safe, high-quality patient-centred care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8312363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The College of Paramedics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83123632022-05-01 To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study Thompson, Lee Shaw, Gary Bates, Charlotte Hawkins, Christopher McClelland, Graham McMeekin, Peter Br Paramed J Original Research BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a rare event, with high numbers of patients unnecessarily immobilised with no potential benefit based on limited evidence from the 1950s and 1960s. Contemporary opinion now challenges the notion that traditional immobilisation prevents movement and protects the spine. Current literature suggests that these methods which include semi-rigid collars can potentially cause more movement of the spine and harm the patient. The purpose of this study was to explore the views and perspectives of pre-hospital care providers on immobilising patients without the use of a semi-rigid collar. METHODS: Focus groups were used to allow individuals to discuss and comment on a new method of immobilisation which omits the semi-rigid collar and to capture the thoughts, feelings and experiences of participants. Thematic analysis of the coded transcriptions was used to identify emerging themes. RESULTS: Three focus groups were conducted with 15 participants in each. Participants were all exposed to patients sustaining trauma within their professional roles. Six intertwined themes emerged from the analysis: communication, conflict, education/training, empowerment, risk and the patient. Woven between these themes are the complex interactions that bring together the inter-professional relationships with other emergency services and hospital staff, the patient, the public and pre-hospital care providers. DISCUSSION: Existing immobilisation practices are being challenged, with clinicians empowered to tailor practice to meet specific patient needs. There is limited empirical evidence to support current immobilisation practices. Contemporary literature suggests current practices may potentially cause harm. New pragmatic immobilisation practices are gradually being adopted by some pre-hospital care providers. CONCLUSION: This study explored the perspectives of pre-hospital care providers on immobilising patients without the use of a semi-rigid collar for potential SCI. The consensus of the participants supports a pragmatic approach to managing potential SCI that provides safe, high-quality patient-centred care. The College of Paramedics 2021-05-01 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8312363/ /pubmed/34335099 http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.38 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Thompson, Lee Shaw, Gary Bates, Charlotte Hawkins, Christopher McClelland, Graham McMeekin, Peter To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study |
title | To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study |
title_full | To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study |
title_fullStr | To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study |
title_full_unstemmed | To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study |
title_short | To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study |
title_sort | to collar or not to collar. views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335099 http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.38 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonlee tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy AT shawgary tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy AT batescharlotte tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy AT hawkinschristopher tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy AT mcclellandgraham tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy AT mcmeekinpeter tocollarornottocollarviewsofprehospitalemergencycareprovidersonimmobilisationwithoutcervicalcollarsafocusgroupstudy |