Cargando…

Fracture resistance of resin based and lithium disilicate endocrowns. Which is better? – A systematic review of in-vitro studies

Objectives: The primary objective of this systematic review is to compare the fracture resistance of lithium disilicate (LDS)-based endocrowns and resin-based (RB) endocrowns of in-vitro studies, and the secondary objective is to compare their catastrophic failures. Materials and Methods: The review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beji Vijayakumar, Joshna, Varadan, Preethi, Balaji, Lakshmi, Rajan, Mathan, Kalaiselvam, Rajeswari, Saeralaathan, Sindhu, Ganesh, Arathi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34368777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1932510
_version_ 1783729173839216640
author Beji Vijayakumar, Joshna
Varadan, Preethi
Balaji, Lakshmi
Rajan, Mathan
Kalaiselvam, Rajeswari
Saeralaathan, Sindhu
Ganesh, Arathi
author_facet Beji Vijayakumar, Joshna
Varadan, Preethi
Balaji, Lakshmi
Rajan, Mathan
Kalaiselvam, Rajeswari
Saeralaathan, Sindhu
Ganesh, Arathi
author_sort Beji Vijayakumar, Joshna
collection PubMed
description Objectives: The primary objective of this systematic review is to compare the fracture resistance of lithium disilicate (LDS)-based endocrowns and resin-based (RB) endocrowns of in-vitro studies, and the secondary objective is to compare their catastrophic failures. Materials and Methods: The review protocol was registered in the P ROSP ERO database (CRD42020166201). A comprehensive literature search was done in PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCOhost and Google Scholar using key terms. Only in-vitro studies that compared fracture resistance of LDS-based endocrowns and indirect RB endocrowns in molars were included. Data extraction, risk of bias assessment and qualitative analysis of the included studies were performed. Results: Five studies were included in this systematic review. The overall risk of bias for the included studies was moderate. Under axial loading, RB endocrowns showed similar fracture resistance when compared with LDS endocrowns. However, they showed better fracture resistance when compared with zirconia reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) endocrowns. Furthermore, RB endocrowns showed fewer catastrophic failures than LDS-based endocrowns. Conclusions: RB endocrowns have similar or better fracture resistance and fewer catastrophic failures when compared to LDS-based endocrowns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8312589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83125892021-08-06 Fracture resistance of resin based and lithium disilicate endocrowns. Which is better? – A systematic review of in-vitro studies Beji Vijayakumar, Joshna Varadan, Preethi Balaji, Lakshmi Rajan, Mathan Kalaiselvam, Rajeswari Saeralaathan, Sindhu Ganesh, Arathi Biomater Investig Dent Review Article Objectives: The primary objective of this systematic review is to compare the fracture resistance of lithium disilicate (LDS)-based endocrowns and resin-based (RB) endocrowns of in-vitro studies, and the secondary objective is to compare their catastrophic failures. Materials and Methods: The review protocol was registered in the P ROSP ERO database (CRD42020166201). A comprehensive literature search was done in PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCOhost and Google Scholar using key terms. Only in-vitro studies that compared fracture resistance of LDS-based endocrowns and indirect RB endocrowns in molars were included. Data extraction, risk of bias assessment and qualitative analysis of the included studies were performed. Results: Five studies were included in this systematic review. The overall risk of bias for the included studies was moderate. Under axial loading, RB endocrowns showed similar fracture resistance when compared with LDS endocrowns. However, they showed better fracture resistance when compared with zirconia reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) endocrowns. Furthermore, RB endocrowns showed fewer catastrophic failures than LDS-based endocrowns. Conclusions: RB endocrowns have similar or better fracture resistance and fewer catastrophic failures when compared to LDS-based endocrowns. Taylor & Francis 2021-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8312589/ /pubmed/34368777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1932510 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Beji Vijayakumar, Joshna
Varadan, Preethi
Balaji, Lakshmi
Rajan, Mathan
Kalaiselvam, Rajeswari
Saeralaathan, Sindhu
Ganesh, Arathi
Fracture resistance of resin based and lithium disilicate endocrowns. Which is better? – A systematic review of in-vitro studies
title Fracture resistance of resin based and lithium disilicate endocrowns. Which is better? – A systematic review of in-vitro studies
title_full Fracture resistance of resin based and lithium disilicate endocrowns. Which is better? – A systematic review of in-vitro studies
title_fullStr Fracture resistance of resin based and lithium disilicate endocrowns. Which is better? – A systematic review of in-vitro studies
title_full_unstemmed Fracture resistance of resin based and lithium disilicate endocrowns. Which is better? – A systematic review of in-vitro studies
title_short Fracture resistance of resin based and lithium disilicate endocrowns. Which is better? – A systematic review of in-vitro studies
title_sort fracture resistance of resin based and lithium disilicate endocrowns. which is better? – a systematic review of in-vitro studies
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34368777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1932510
work_keys_str_mv AT bejivijayakumarjoshna fractureresistanceofresinbasedandlithiumdisilicateendocrownswhichisbetterasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT varadanpreethi fractureresistanceofresinbasedandlithiumdisilicateendocrownswhichisbetterasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT balajilakshmi fractureresistanceofresinbasedandlithiumdisilicateendocrownswhichisbetterasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT rajanmathan fractureresistanceofresinbasedandlithiumdisilicateendocrownswhichisbetterasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT kalaiselvamrajeswari fractureresistanceofresinbasedandlithiumdisilicateendocrownswhichisbetterasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT saeralaathansindhu fractureresistanceofresinbasedandlithiumdisilicateendocrownswhichisbetterasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies
AT ganesharathi fractureresistanceofresinbasedandlithiumdisilicateendocrownswhichisbetterasystematicreviewofinvitrostudies