Cargando…

Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management

Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts. This definition links probiotic efficacy to microbial viability. The current gold standard assay for probiotic potency is enumeration using classical microbiology plating-based procedur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weitzel, M. L. Jane, Vegge, Christina S., Pane, Marco, Goldman, Virginia S., Koshy, Binu, Porsby, Cisse Hedegaard, Burguière, Pierre, Schoeni, Jean L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.693066
_version_ 1783729183396986880
author Weitzel, M. L. Jane
Vegge, Christina S.
Pane, Marco
Goldman, Virginia S.
Koshy, Binu
Porsby, Cisse Hedegaard
Burguière, Pierre
Schoeni, Jean L.
author_facet Weitzel, M. L. Jane
Vegge, Christina S.
Pane, Marco
Goldman, Virginia S.
Koshy, Binu
Porsby, Cisse Hedegaard
Burguière, Pierre
Schoeni, Jean L.
author_sort Weitzel, M. L. Jane
collection PubMed
description Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts. This definition links probiotic efficacy to microbial viability. The current gold standard assay for probiotic potency is enumeration using classical microbiology plating-based procedures, yielding results in colony-forming units (CFU). One drawback to plating-based procedures is high variability due to intrinsic and extrinsic uncertainties. These uncertainties make comparison between analytical procedures challenging. In this article, we provide tools to reduce measurement uncertainty and strengthen the reliability of probiotic enumerations by using analytical procedure lifecycle management (APLM). APLM is a tool that uses a step-by-step process to define procedure performance based on the concept that the reportable value (final CFU result) must be fit for its intended use. Once the procedure performance is defined, the information gathered through APLM can be used to evaluate and compare procedures. Here, we discuss the theory behind applying APLM and give practical information about its application to CFU enumeration procedures for probiotics using a simulated example and data set. Data collected in a manufacturer’s development laboratory is included to support application of the concept. Implementation of APLM can lead to reduced variability by identifying specific factors (e.g., the dilution step) with significant impact on the variability and providing insights to procedural modifications that lead to process improvement. Understanding and control of the analytical procedure is improved by using these tools. The probiotics industry can confidently apply the information and analytical results generated to make decisions about processes and formulation, including overage requirements. One benefit of this approach is that companies can reduce overage costs. More reliable procedures for viable cell count determinations will improve the quality evaluation of probiotic products, and hence manufacturing procedures, while ensuring that products deliver clinically demonstrated beneficial doses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8312684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83126842021-07-27 Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management Weitzel, M. L. Jane Vegge, Christina S. Pane, Marco Goldman, Virginia S. Koshy, Binu Porsby, Cisse Hedegaard Burguière, Pierre Schoeni, Jean L. Front Microbiol Microbiology Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts. This definition links probiotic efficacy to microbial viability. The current gold standard assay for probiotic potency is enumeration using classical microbiology plating-based procedures, yielding results in colony-forming units (CFU). One drawback to plating-based procedures is high variability due to intrinsic and extrinsic uncertainties. These uncertainties make comparison between analytical procedures challenging. In this article, we provide tools to reduce measurement uncertainty and strengthen the reliability of probiotic enumerations by using analytical procedure lifecycle management (APLM). APLM is a tool that uses a step-by-step process to define procedure performance based on the concept that the reportable value (final CFU result) must be fit for its intended use. Once the procedure performance is defined, the information gathered through APLM can be used to evaluate and compare procedures. Here, we discuss the theory behind applying APLM and give practical information about its application to CFU enumeration procedures for probiotics using a simulated example and data set. Data collected in a manufacturer’s development laboratory is included to support application of the concept. Implementation of APLM can lead to reduced variability by identifying specific factors (e.g., the dilution step) with significant impact on the variability and providing insights to procedural modifications that lead to process improvement. Understanding and control of the analytical procedure is improved by using these tools. The probiotics industry can confidently apply the information and analytical results generated to make decisions about processes and formulation, including overage requirements. One benefit of this approach is that companies can reduce overage costs. More reliable procedures for viable cell count determinations will improve the quality evaluation of probiotic products, and hence manufacturing procedures, while ensuring that products deliver clinically demonstrated beneficial doses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8312684/ /pubmed/34322106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.693066 Text en Copyright © 2021 Weitzel, Vegge, Pane, Goldman, Koshy, Porsby, Burguière and Schoeni. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Weitzel, M. L. Jane
Vegge, Christina S.
Pane, Marco
Goldman, Virginia S.
Koshy, Binu
Porsby, Cisse Hedegaard
Burguière, Pierre
Schoeni, Jean L.
Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
title Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
title_full Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
title_fullStr Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
title_full_unstemmed Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
title_short Improving and Comparing Probiotic Plate Count Methods by Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Management
title_sort improving and comparing probiotic plate count methods by analytical procedure lifecycle management
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.693066
work_keys_str_mv AT weitzelmljane improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT veggechristinas improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT panemarco improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT goldmanvirginias improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT koshybinu improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT porsbycissehedegaard improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT burguierepierre improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement
AT schoenijeanl improvingandcomparingprobioticplatecountmethodsbyanalyticalprocedurelifecyclemanagement