Cargando…

QS9: Host Biofilm Interaction In Breast Implant Illness

PURPOSE: Breast Implant Illness (BII) is patient-described constellation of symptoms that are believed to be related to their breast implant. The symptoms described include fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue and a host of other symptoms that are often associated with autoimmune illnesses. In this work, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Imran, Minto, Robert E., Kelley-Patteson, Christine, Van Natta, Bruce, Mohan, Ganesh, Suh, Lily, Singh, Kanhaiya, Lester, Mary, Jason VonDerHaar, R, Gordillo, Gayle M., Hassanein, Aladdin, Sen, Chandan K., Kadin, Marshall E., Sinha, Mithun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312839/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000770192.11177.ef
_version_ 1783729212480290816
author Khan, Imran
Minto, Robert E.
Kelley-Patteson, Christine
Van Natta, Bruce
Mohan, Ganesh
Suh, Lily
Singh, Kanhaiya
Lester, Mary
Jason VonDerHaar, R
Gordillo, Gayle M.
Hassanein, Aladdin
Sen, Chandan K.
Kadin, Marshall E.
Sinha, Mithun
author_facet Khan, Imran
Minto, Robert E.
Kelley-Patteson, Christine
Van Natta, Bruce
Mohan, Ganesh
Suh, Lily
Singh, Kanhaiya
Lester, Mary
Jason VonDerHaar, R
Gordillo, Gayle M.
Hassanein, Aladdin
Sen, Chandan K.
Kadin, Marshall E.
Sinha, Mithun
author_sort Khan, Imran
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Breast Implant Illness (BII) is patient-described constellation of symptoms that are believed to be related to their breast implant. The symptoms described include fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue and a host of other symptoms that are often associated with autoimmune illnesses. In this work, we report that bacterial biofilm associated with breast implant, metabolize fatty acid oleic acid present in the breast tissue milieu to oxylipins, one such oxylipin identified from this study is (10S)-hydroxy-(8E)-octadecenoic acid (10-HOME). We hypothesize that immunomodulatory effects of oxylipin 10-HOME produced by biofilm present on the implant could be correlated with BII pathogenesis. METHODS: Capsulectomy and breast implants from clinically indicated procedures for patients requesting prosthetic removal were collected using clinical parameters outlined in previous studies, and questionnaire screened for the commonly reported symptoms associated with BII. Predictive variables included age, diabetes status, co-morbidities, nature and duration of implant. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA) and 16SrRNA sequencing were used for bacterial biofilm bacterial identification. 10-HOME was quantitated through targeted and untargeted lipidomic analyses using LC-MS-MS. RESULTS: Sixty eight Implant, associated capsules and breast tissue specimen were collected for BII (n=46) and two control groups, group I, (non-BII, n=14) patients with breast implants, no BII symptoms. Group II (normal tissue, n = 8), patients without an implant, whose breast tissue was removed due to surgical procedures. Bacterial biofilm was detected through SEM in both BII and non BII cohorts. However, WGA analysis (quantitative analysis) indicated increased abundance of biofilm in the BII cohort (n=7, p=0.0036). 16SrRNA (genomic) sequencing identified increased abundance of Staphylococcus epidermidis (Fisher’s exact test, p<0.001) in the BII group (63.04%) compared to non-BII group (14.3%) and the normal group. The BII group was 9.8 times significantly more likely to have Staphylococcus epidermidis colonization compared to the non-BII group (p=0.003, logistic regression), compared to normal, it is 17.4 times significantly more likely to have Staphylococcus epidermidis (p=0.0021). Elevated levels of 10-HOME BII compared to non-BII samples, (p < 0.0001) were observed through mass spectrometry. Positive correlation was observed between bacterial abundance and concentration of 10-HOME in BII subjects (R2=0.88). Similar correlation was observed in BII subjects with Staphylococcus epidermidis (R2=0.77). CONCLUSION: This study investigated the biofilm hypothesis of breast implant illness through a host-pathogen interaction. The breast microenvironment led to formation of biofilm derived 10-HOME from host oleic acid. The study provides the first evidence of a possible correlation between bacterial biofilm and biofilm derived 10-HOME in the context of 10-HOME. In consideration of reports of biofilm association with other metal implants, the findings of this study can possibly explain autoimmune response associated with those implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8312839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83128392021-07-27 QS9: Host Biofilm Interaction In Breast Implant Illness Khan, Imran Minto, Robert E. Kelley-Patteson, Christine Van Natta, Bruce Mohan, Ganesh Suh, Lily Singh, Kanhaiya Lester, Mary Jason VonDerHaar, R Gordillo, Gayle M. Hassanein, Aladdin Sen, Chandan K. Kadin, Marshall E. Sinha, Mithun Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open PSRC 2021 Abstract Supplement PURPOSE: Breast Implant Illness (BII) is patient-described constellation of symptoms that are believed to be related to their breast implant. The symptoms described include fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue and a host of other symptoms that are often associated with autoimmune illnesses. In this work, we report that bacterial biofilm associated with breast implant, metabolize fatty acid oleic acid present in the breast tissue milieu to oxylipins, one such oxylipin identified from this study is (10S)-hydroxy-(8E)-octadecenoic acid (10-HOME). We hypothesize that immunomodulatory effects of oxylipin 10-HOME produced by biofilm present on the implant could be correlated with BII pathogenesis. METHODS: Capsulectomy and breast implants from clinically indicated procedures for patients requesting prosthetic removal were collected using clinical parameters outlined in previous studies, and questionnaire screened for the commonly reported symptoms associated with BII. Predictive variables included age, diabetes status, co-morbidities, nature and duration of implant. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA) and 16SrRNA sequencing were used for bacterial biofilm bacterial identification. 10-HOME was quantitated through targeted and untargeted lipidomic analyses using LC-MS-MS. RESULTS: Sixty eight Implant, associated capsules and breast tissue specimen were collected for BII (n=46) and two control groups, group I, (non-BII, n=14) patients with breast implants, no BII symptoms. Group II (normal tissue, n = 8), patients without an implant, whose breast tissue was removed due to surgical procedures. Bacterial biofilm was detected through SEM in both BII and non BII cohorts. However, WGA analysis (quantitative analysis) indicated increased abundance of biofilm in the BII cohort (n=7, p=0.0036). 16SrRNA (genomic) sequencing identified increased abundance of Staphylococcus epidermidis (Fisher’s exact test, p<0.001) in the BII group (63.04%) compared to non-BII group (14.3%) and the normal group. The BII group was 9.8 times significantly more likely to have Staphylococcus epidermidis colonization compared to the non-BII group (p=0.003, logistic regression), compared to normal, it is 17.4 times significantly more likely to have Staphylococcus epidermidis (p=0.0021). Elevated levels of 10-HOME BII compared to non-BII samples, (p < 0.0001) were observed through mass spectrometry. Positive correlation was observed between bacterial abundance and concentration of 10-HOME in BII subjects (R2=0.88). Similar correlation was observed in BII subjects with Staphylococcus epidermidis (R2=0.77). CONCLUSION: This study investigated the biofilm hypothesis of breast implant illness through a host-pathogen interaction. The breast microenvironment led to formation of biofilm derived 10-HOME from host oleic acid. The study provides the first evidence of a possible correlation between bacterial biofilm and biofilm derived 10-HOME in the context of 10-HOME. In consideration of reports of biofilm association with other metal implants, the findings of this study can possibly explain autoimmune response associated with those implants. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8312839/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000770192.11177.ef Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle PSRC 2021 Abstract Supplement
Khan, Imran
Minto, Robert E.
Kelley-Patteson, Christine
Van Natta, Bruce
Mohan, Ganesh
Suh, Lily
Singh, Kanhaiya
Lester, Mary
Jason VonDerHaar, R
Gordillo, Gayle M.
Hassanein, Aladdin
Sen, Chandan K.
Kadin, Marshall E.
Sinha, Mithun
QS9: Host Biofilm Interaction In Breast Implant Illness
title QS9: Host Biofilm Interaction In Breast Implant Illness
title_full QS9: Host Biofilm Interaction In Breast Implant Illness
title_fullStr QS9: Host Biofilm Interaction In Breast Implant Illness
title_full_unstemmed QS9: Host Biofilm Interaction In Breast Implant Illness
title_short QS9: Host Biofilm Interaction In Breast Implant Illness
title_sort qs9: host biofilm interaction in breast implant illness
topic PSRC 2021 Abstract Supplement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312839/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000770192.11177.ef
work_keys_str_mv AT khanimran qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT mintoroberte qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT kelleypattesonchristine qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT vannattabruce qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT mohanganesh qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT suhlily qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT singhkanhaiya qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT lestermary qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT jasonvonderhaarr qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT gordillogaylem qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT hassaneinaladdin qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT senchandank qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT kadinmarshalle qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness
AT sinhamithun qs9hostbiofilminteractioninbreastimplantillness