Cargando…

Positioning zoonotic disease research in forced migration: A systematic literature review of theoretical frameworks and approaches

BACKGROUND: The emergence and transmission of zoonotic diseases are driven by complex interactions between health, environmental, and socio-political systems. Human movement is considered a significant and increasing factor in these processes, yet forced migration remains an understudied area of zoo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tasker, Alex, Braam, Dorien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254746
_version_ 1783729232663281664
author Tasker, Alex
Braam, Dorien
author_facet Tasker, Alex
Braam, Dorien
author_sort Tasker, Alex
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The emergence and transmission of zoonotic diseases are driven by complex interactions between health, environmental, and socio-political systems. Human movement is considered a significant and increasing factor in these processes, yet forced migration remains an understudied area of zoonotic research–due in part to the complexity of conducting interdisciplinary research in these settings. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review to identify and analyze theoretical frameworks and approaches used to study linkages between forced migration and zoonotic diseases. METHODS: We searched within eight electronic databases: ProQuest, SCOPUS, Web of Science, PubMed, PLoSOne, Science Direct, JSTOR, and Google Scholar, to identify a) research articles focusing on zoonoses considering forced migrants in their study populations, and b) forced migration literature which engaged with zoonotic disease. Both authors conducted a full-text review, evaluating the quality of literature reviews and primary data using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) model, while theoretical papers were evaluated for quality using a theory synthesis adapted from Bonell et al. (2013). Qualitative data were synthesized thematically according to the method suggested by Noblit and Hare (1988). RESULTS: Analyses of the 23 included articles showed the increasing use of interdisciplinary frameworks and approaches over time, the majority of which stemmed from political ecology. Approaches such as EcoHealth and One Health were increasingly popular, but were more often linked to program implementation and development than broader contextual research. The majority of research failed to acknowledge the heterogeneity of migrant populations, lacked contextual depth, and insufficient acknowledgments of migrant agency in responding to zoonotic threats. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing the emergence and spread of zoonoses in forced migration contexts requires more careful consideration and use of interdisciplinary research to integrate the contributions of social and natural science approaches. Robust interdisciplinary theoretical frameworks are an important step for better understanding the complex health, environment, and socio-political drivers of zoonotic diseases in forced migration. Lessons can be learned from the application of these approaches in other hard-to-reach or seldom-heard populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8312951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83129512021-07-31 Positioning zoonotic disease research in forced migration: A systematic literature review of theoretical frameworks and approaches Tasker, Alex Braam, Dorien PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The emergence and transmission of zoonotic diseases are driven by complex interactions between health, environmental, and socio-political systems. Human movement is considered a significant and increasing factor in these processes, yet forced migration remains an understudied area of zoonotic research–due in part to the complexity of conducting interdisciplinary research in these settings. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review to identify and analyze theoretical frameworks and approaches used to study linkages between forced migration and zoonotic diseases. METHODS: We searched within eight electronic databases: ProQuest, SCOPUS, Web of Science, PubMed, PLoSOne, Science Direct, JSTOR, and Google Scholar, to identify a) research articles focusing on zoonoses considering forced migrants in their study populations, and b) forced migration literature which engaged with zoonotic disease. Both authors conducted a full-text review, evaluating the quality of literature reviews and primary data using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) model, while theoretical papers were evaluated for quality using a theory synthesis adapted from Bonell et al. (2013). Qualitative data were synthesized thematically according to the method suggested by Noblit and Hare (1988). RESULTS: Analyses of the 23 included articles showed the increasing use of interdisciplinary frameworks and approaches over time, the majority of which stemmed from political ecology. Approaches such as EcoHealth and One Health were increasingly popular, but were more often linked to program implementation and development than broader contextual research. The majority of research failed to acknowledge the heterogeneity of migrant populations, lacked contextual depth, and insufficient acknowledgments of migrant agency in responding to zoonotic threats. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing the emergence and spread of zoonoses in forced migration contexts requires more careful consideration and use of interdisciplinary research to integrate the contributions of social and natural science approaches. Robust interdisciplinary theoretical frameworks are an important step for better understanding the complex health, environment, and socio-political drivers of zoonotic diseases in forced migration. Lessons can be learned from the application of these approaches in other hard-to-reach or seldom-heard populations. Public Library of Science 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8312951/ /pubmed/34310626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254746 Text en © 2021 Tasker, Braam https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tasker, Alex
Braam, Dorien
Positioning zoonotic disease research in forced migration: A systematic literature review of theoretical frameworks and approaches
title Positioning zoonotic disease research in forced migration: A systematic literature review of theoretical frameworks and approaches
title_full Positioning zoonotic disease research in forced migration: A systematic literature review of theoretical frameworks and approaches
title_fullStr Positioning zoonotic disease research in forced migration: A systematic literature review of theoretical frameworks and approaches
title_full_unstemmed Positioning zoonotic disease research in forced migration: A systematic literature review of theoretical frameworks and approaches
title_short Positioning zoonotic disease research in forced migration: A systematic literature review of theoretical frameworks and approaches
title_sort positioning zoonotic disease research in forced migration: a systematic literature review of theoretical frameworks and approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8312951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254746
work_keys_str_mv AT taskeralex positioningzoonoticdiseaseresearchinforcedmigrationasystematicliteraturereviewoftheoreticalframeworksandapproaches
AT braamdorien positioningzoonoticdiseaseresearchinforcedmigrationasystematicliteraturereviewoftheoreticalframeworksandapproaches