Cargando…
Combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non‐tuberculous mycobacteria
Non‐tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) can cause various respiratory diseases and even death in severe cases, and its incidence has increased rapidly worldwide. To date, it’s difficult to use routine diagnostic methods and strain identification to precisely diagnose various types of NTM infections. We c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8313281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34019733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13815 |
_version_ | 1783729312161071104 |
---|---|
author | Jia, Xinmiao Yang, Linfang Li, Cuidan Xu, Yingchun Yang, Qiwen Chen, Fei |
author_facet | Jia, Xinmiao Yang, Linfang Li, Cuidan Xu, Yingchun Yang, Qiwen Chen, Fei |
author_sort | Jia, Xinmiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non‐tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) can cause various respiratory diseases and even death in severe cases, and its incidence has increased rapidly worldwide. To date, it’s difficult to use routine diagnostic methods and strain identification to precisely diagnose various types of NTM infections. We combined systematic comparative genomics with machine learning to select new diagnostic markers for precisely identifying five common pathogenic NTMs (Mycobacterium kansasii, Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellular, Mycobacterium chelonae, Mycobacterium abscessus). A panel including six genes and two SNPs (nikA, benM, codA, pfkA2, mpr, yjcH, rrl C2638T, rrl A1173G) was selected to simultaneously identify the five NTMs with high accuracy (> 90%). Notably, the panel only containing the six genes also showed a good classification effect (accuracy > 90%). Additionally, the two panels could precisely differentiate the five NTMs from M. tuberculosis (accuracy > 99%). We also revealed some new marker genes/SNPs/combinations to accurately discriminate any one of the five NTMs separately, which provided the possibility to diagnose one certain NTM infection precisely. Our research not only reveals novel promising diagnostic markers to promote the development of precision diagnosis in NTM infectious, but also provides an insight into precisely identifying various genetically close pathogens through comparative genomics and machine learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8313281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83132812021-07-30 Combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non‐tuberculous mycobacteria Jia, Xinmiao Yang, Linfang Li, Cuidan Xu, Yingchun Yang, Qiwen Chen, Fei Microb Biotechnol Research Articles Non‐tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) can cause various respiratory diseases and even death in severe cases, and its incidence has increased rapidly worldwide. To date, it’s difficult to use routine diagnostic methods and strain identification to precisely diagnose various types of NTM infections. We combined systematic comparative genomics with machine learning to select new diagnostic markers for precisely identifying five common pathogenic NTMs (Mycobacterium kansasii, Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellular, Mycobacterium chelonae, Mycobacterium abscessus). A panel including six genes and two SNPs (nikA, benM, codA, pfkA2, mpr, yjcH, rrl C2638T, rrl A1173G) was selected to simultaneously identify the five NTMs with high accuracy (> 90%). Notably, the panel only containing the six genes also showed a good classification effect (accuracy > 90%). Additionally, the two panels could precisely differentiate the five NTMs from M. tuberculosis (accuracy > 99%). We also revealed some new marker genes/SNPs/combinations to accurately discriminate any one of the five NTMs separately, which provided the possibility to diagnose one certain NTM infection precisely. Our research not only reveals novel promising diagnostic markers to promote the development of precision diagnosis in NTM infectious, but also provides an insight into precisely identifying various genetically close pathogens through comparative genomics and machine learning. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8313281/ /pubmed/34019733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13815 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Jia, Xinmiao Yang, Linfang Li, Cuidan Xu, Yingchun Yang, Qiwen Chen, Fei Combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non‐tuberculous mycobacteria |
title | Combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non‐tuberculous mycobacteria |
title_full | Combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non‐tuberculous mycobacteria |
title_fullStr | Combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non‐tuberculous mycobacteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non‐tuberculous mycobacteria |
title_short | Combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non‐tuberculous mycobacteria |
title_sort | combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non‐tuberculous mycobacteria |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8313281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34019733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13815 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiaxinmiao combiningcomparativegenomicanalysiswithmachinelearningrevealssomepromisingdiagnosticmarkerstoidentifyfivecommonpathogenicnontuberculousmycobacteria AT yanglinfang combiningcomparativegenomicanalysiswithmachinelearningrevealssomepromisingdiagnosticmarkerstoidentifyfivecommonpathogenicnontuberculousmycobacteria AT licuidan combiningcomparativegenomicanalysiswithmachinelearningrevealssomepromisingdiagnosticmarkerstoidentifyfivecommonpathogenicnontuberculousmycobacteria AT xuyingchun combiningcomparativegenomicanalysiswithmachinelearningrevealssomepromisingdiagnosticmarkerstoidentifyfivecommonpathogenicnontuberculousmycobacteria AT yangqiwen combiningcomparativegenomicanalysiswithmachinelearningrevealssomepromisingdiagnosticmarkerstoidentifyfivecommonpathogenicnontuberculousmycobacteria AT chenfei combiningcomparativegenomicanalysiswithmachinelearningrevealssomepromisingdiagnosticmarkerstoidentifyfivecommonpathogenicnontuberculousmycobacteria |