Cargando…

ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX–XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(†)

STUDY QUESTION: What are the trends and developments in pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) in 2016–2017 as compared to previous years? SUMMARY ANSWER: The main trends observed in this 19th and 20th data set on PGT are that trophectoderm biopsy has become the main biopsy stage for PGT for aneuplo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Montfoort, A, Carvalho, F, Coonen, E, Kokkali, G, Moutou, C, Rubio, C, Goossens, V, De Rycke, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8313404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab024
_version_ 1783729340073115648
author van Montfoort, A
Carvalho, F
Coonen, E
Kokkali, G
Moutou, C
Rubio, C
Goossens, V
De Rycke, M
author_facet van Montfoort, A
Carvalho, F
Coonen, E
Kokkali, G
Moutou, C
Rubio, C
Goossens, V
De Rycke, M
author_sort van Montfoort, A
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: What are the trends and developments in pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) in 2016–2017 as compared to previous years? SUMMARY ANSWER: The main trends observed in this 19th and 20th data set on PGT are that trophectoderm biopsy has become the main biopsy stage for PGT for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and that the implementation of comprehensive testing technologies is the most advanced with PGT-A. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Since it was established in 1997, the ESHRE PGT Consortium has been collecting and analysing data from mainly European PGT centres. To date, 18 data sets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections have been published. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The data for PGT analyses performed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017 with a 2-year follow-up after analysis were provided by participating centres on a voluntary basis. Data were collected using a new online platform, which is based on genetic analysis as opposed to the former cycle-based format. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Data on biopsy method, diagnostic technology and clinical outcome were submitted by 61 centres. Records with analyses for more than one PGT for monogenic/single gene defects (PGT-M) and/or PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) indication or with inconsistent data regarding the PGT modality were excluded. All transfers performed within 2 years after the analysis were included enabling the calculation of cumulative pregnancy rates. Data analysis, calculations, figures and tables were made by expert co-authors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The current data collection from 2016 to 2017 covers a total of 3098 analyses for PGT-M, 1018 analyses for PGT-SR, 4033 analyses for PGT-A and 654 analyses for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A. The application of blastocyst biopsy is gradually rising for PGT-M (from 8–12% in 2013–2015 to 19% in 2016–2017), is status quo for PGT-R (from 22–36% in 2013–2015 to 30% in 2016–2017) and has become the preferential biopsy stage for PGT-A (from 23–36% in 2013–2015 to 87% in 2016–2017). For concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A, biopsy was primarily performed at the blastocyst stage (93%). The use of comprehensive diagnostic technology showed a similar trend with a small increased use for PGT-M (from 9–12% in 2013–2015 to 15% in 2016–2017) and a status quo for PGT-SR (from 36–58% in 2013–2015 to 50% in 2016–2017). Comprehensive testing was the main technology for PGT-A (from 66–75% in 2013–2015 to 93% in 2016–2017) and for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A (93%). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The findings apply to the data submitted by 61 participating centres and do not represent worldwide trends in PGT. Details on the health of babies born were not provided in this manuscript. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Being the largest data collection on PGT in Europe/worldwide, the data sets provide a valuable resource for following trends in PGT practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study has no external funding and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8313404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83134042021-07-27 ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX–XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(†) van Montfoort, A Carvalho, F Coonen, E Kokkali, G Moutou, C Rubio, C Goossens, V De Rycke, M Hum Reprod Open ESHRE Pages STUDY QUESTION: What are the trends and developments in pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) in 2016–2017 as compared to previous years? SUMMARY ANSWER: The main trends observed in this 19th and 20th data set on PGT are that trophectoderm biopsy has become the main biopsy stage for PGT for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and that the implementation of comprehensive testing technologies is the most advanced with PGT-A. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Since it was established in 1997, the ESHRE PGT Consortium has been collecting and analysing data from mainly European PGT centres. To date, 18 data sets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections have been published. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The data for PGT analyses performed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017 with a 2-year follow-up after analysis were provided by participating centres on a voluntary basis. Data were collected using a new online platform, which is based on genetic analysis as opposed to the former cycle-based format. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Data on biopsy method, diagnostic technology and clinical outcome were submitted by 61 centres. Records with analyses for more than one PGT for monogenic/single gene defects (PGT-M) and/or PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) indication or with inconsistent data regarding the PGT modality were excluded. All transfers performed within 2 years after the analysis were included enabling the calculation of cumulative pregnancy rates. Data analysis, calculations, figures and tables were made by expert co-authors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The current data collection from 2016 to 2017 covers a total of 3098 analyses for PGT-M, 1018 analyses for PGT-SR, 4033 analyses for PGT-A and 654 analyses for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A. The application of blastocyst biopsy is gradually rising for PGT-M (from 8–12% in 2013–2015 to 19% in 2016–2017), is status quo for PGT-R (from 22–36% in 2013–2015 to 30% in 2016–2017) and has become the preferential biopsy stage for PGT-A (from 23–36% in 2013–2015 to 87% in 2016–2017). For concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A, biopsy was primarily performed at the blastocyst stage (93%). The use of comprehensive diagnostic technology showed a similar trend with a small increased use for PGT-M (from 9–12% in 2013–2015 to 15% in 2016–2017) and a status quo for PGT-SR (from 36–58% in 2013–2015 to 50% in 2016–2017). Comprehensive testing was the main technology for PGT-A (from 66–75% in 2013–2015 to 93% in 2016–2017) and for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A (93%). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The findings apply to the data submitted by 61 participating centres and do not represent worldwide trends in PGT. Details on the health of babies born were not provided in this manuscript. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Being the largest data collection on PGT in Europe/worldwide, the data sets provide a valuable resource for following trends in PGT practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study has no external funding and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A. Oxford University Press 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8313404/ /pubmed/34322603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab024 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle ESHRE Pages
van Montfoort, A
Carvalho, F
Coonen, E
Kokkali, G
Moutou, C
Rubio, C
Goossens, V
De Rycke, M
ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX–XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(†)
title ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX–XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(†)
title_full ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX–XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(†)
title_fullStr ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX–XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(†)
title_full_unstemmed ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX–XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(†)
title_short ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX–XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017(†)
title_sort eshre pgt consortium data collection xix–xx: pgt analyses from 2016 to 2017(†)
topic ESHRE Pages
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8313404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab024
work_keys_str_mv AT vanmontfoorta eshrepgtconsortiumdatacollectionxixxxpgtanalysesfrom2016to2017
AT carvalhof eshrepgtconsortiumdatacollectionxixxxpgtanalysesfrom2016to2017
AT coonene eshrepgtconsortiumdatacollectionxixxxpgtanalysesfrom2016to2017
AT kokkalig eshrepgtconsortiumdatacollectionxixxxpgtanalysesfrom2016to2017
AT moutouc eshrepgtconsortiumdatacollectionxixxxpgtanalysesfrom2016to2017
AT rubioc eshrepgtconsortiumdatacollectionxixxxpgtanalysesfrom2016to2017
AT goossensv eshrepgtconsortiumdatacollectionxixxxpgtanalysesfrom2016to2017
AT deryckem eshrepgtconsortiumdatacollectionxixxxpgtanalysesfrom2016to2017