Cargando…

Unprovoked or provoked venous thromboembolism: not the prevalent criterion to decide on anticoagulation extension in clinical practice of various countries—the prospective, international, observational WHITE study

The decision on treatment after a first venous thromboembolism (VTE) to prevent recurrences may be influenced by many factors. The prospective, observational, WHITE study aimed to analyze how this issue was tackled in every-day clinical practice in various countries, which have sensibly different so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palareti, Gualtiero, Bignamini, Angelo, Cini, Michela, Li, Young-Jun, Urbanek, Tomasz, Madaric, Juraj, Bouslama, Kamel, Sokurenko, German Y., Andreozzi, Giuseppe M., Matuška, Jiří, Mansilha, Armando, Barinov, Victor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8313672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34313959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02765-1
_version_ 1783729391486894080
author Palareti, Gualtiero
Bignamini, Angelo
Cini, Michela
Li, Young-Jun
Urbanek, Tomasz
Madaric, Juraj
Bouslama, Kamel
Sokurenko, German Y.
Andreozzi, Giuseppe M.
Matuška, Jiří
Mansilha, Armando
Barinov, Victor
author_facet Palareti, Gualtiero
Bignamini, Angelo
Cini, Michela
Li, Young-Jun
Urbanek, Tomasz
Madaric, Juraj
Bouslama, Kamel
Sokurenko, German Y.
Andreozzi, Giuseppe M.
Matuška, Jiří
Mansilha, Armando
Barinov, Victor
author_sort Palareti, Gualtiero
collection PubMed
description The decision on treatment after a first venous thromboembolism (VTE) to prevent recurrences may be influenced by many factors. The prospective, observational, WHITE study aimed to analyze how this issue was tackled in every-day clinical practice in various countries, which have sensibly different socio-economic conditions and healthcare systems. Doctors active in 79 Internal or Vascular clinical centers in 7 countries (China, Czechia, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, and Tunisia) enrolled VTE patients after the maintenance treatment phase. The present report analyzed information, collected in the central database, regarding the baseline characteristics, index events, type and duration of anticoagulant therapy and decision on post-maintenance treatment. From April 2018 to December 2020, 1240 patients were enrolled, 58% with an unprovoked index event. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were used in > 85% of all cases in China, Poland, Portugal, Russia and Czechia, in 52% in Slovakia and in no patient in Tunisia. The maintenance anticoagulation lasted in average approximately 6 months. Altogether, anticoagulation was stopped in 20%, extended in about 50%, regardless of whether the event was unprovoked or provoked and shifted to antithrombotics (mainly sulodexide or aspirin) in the remaining patients. In conclusion, some differences in VTE patient management were found between countries. The provoked/unprovoked nature of the index event, instead, was not the prevalent criterion to drive the decision on extension of anticoagulation, without large variations between countries. DOACs were the most widely used anticoagulant drugs, whereas > 25% of patients received antithrombotic drugs instead of anticoagulants as extended treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11739-021-02765-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8313672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83136722021-07-27 Unprovoked or provoked venous thromboembolism: not the prevalent criterion to decide on anticoagulation extension in clinical practice of various countries—the prospective, international, observational WHITE study Palareti, Gualtiero Bignamini, Angelo Cini, Michela Li, Young-Jun Urbanek, Tomasz Madaric, Juraj Bouslama, Kamel Sokurenko, German Y. Andreozzi, Giuseppe M. Matuška, Jiří Mansilha, Armando Barinov, Victor Intern Emerg Med Im - Original The decision on treatment after a first venous thromboembolism (VTE) to prevent recurrences may be influenced by many factors. The prospective, observational, WHITE study aimed to analyze how this issue was tackled in every-day clinical practice in various countries, which have sensibly different socio-economic conditions and healthcare systems. Doctors active in 79 Internal or Vascular clinical centers in 7 countries (China, Czechia, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, and Tunisia) enrolled VTE patients after the maintenance treatment phase. The present report analyzed information, collected in the central database, regarding the baseline characteristics, index events, type and duration of anticoagulant therapy and decision on post-maintenance treatment. From April 2018 to December 2020, 1240 patients were enrolled, 58% with an unprovoked index event. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were used in > 85% of all cases in China, Poland, Portugal, Russia and Czechia, in 52% in Slovakia and in no patient in Tunisia. The maintenance anticoagulation lasted in average approximately 6 months. Altogether, anticoagulation was stopped in 20%, extended in about 50%, regardless of whether the event was unprovoked or provoked and shifted to antithrombotics (mainly sulodexide or aspirin) in the remaining patients. In conclusion, some differences in VTE patient management were found between countries. The provoked/unprovoked nature of the index event, instead, was not the prevalent criterion to drive the decision on extension of anticoagulation, without large variations between countries. DOACs were the most widely used anticoagulant drugs, whereas > 25% of patients received antithrombotic drugs instead of anticoagulants as extended treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11739-021-02765-1. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8313672/ /pubmed/34313959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02765-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Im - Original
Palareti, Gualtiero
Bignamini, Angelo
Cini, Michela
Li, Young-Jun
Urbanek, Tomasz
Madaric, Juraj
Bouslama, Kamel
Sokurenko, German Y.
Andreozzi, Giuseppe M.
Matuška, Jiří
Mansilha, Armando
Barinov, Victor
Unprovoked or provoked venous thromboembolism: not the prevalent criterion to decide on anticoagulation extension in clinical practice of various countries—the prospective, international, observational WHITE study
title Unprovoked or provoked venous thromboembolism: not the prevalent criterion to decide on anticoagulation extension in clinical practice of various countries—the prospective, international, observational WHITE study
title_full Unprovoked or provoked venous thromboembolism: not the prevalent criterion to decide on anticoagulation extension in clinical practice of various countries—the prospective, international, observational WHITE study
title_fullStr Unprovoked or provoked venous thromboembolism: not the prevalent criterion to decide on anticoagulation extension in clinical practice of various countries—the prospective, international, observational WHITE study
title_full_unstemmed Unprovoked or provoked venous thromboembolism: not the prevalent criterion to decide on anticoagulation extension in clinical practice of various countries—the prospective, international, observational WHITE study
title_short Unprovoked or provoked venous thromboembolism: not the prevalent criterion to decide on anticoagulation extension in clinical practice of various countries—the prospective, international, observational WHITE study
title_sort unprovoked or provoked venous thromboembolism: not the prevalent criterion to decide on anticoagulation extension in clinical practice of various countries—the prospective, international, observational white study
topic Im - Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8313672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34313959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02765-1
work_keys_str_mv AT palaretigualtiero unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT bignaminiangelo unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT cinimichela unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT liyoungjun unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT urbanektomasz unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT madaricjuraj unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT bouslamakamel unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT sokurenkogermany unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT andreozzigiuseppem unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT matuskajiri unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT mansilhaarmando unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT barinovvictor unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy
AT unprovokedorprovokedvenousthromboembolismnottheprevalentcriteriontodecideonanticoagulationextensioninclinicalpracticeofvariouscountriestheprospectiveinternationalobservationalwhitestudy