Cargando…
Improving Criminal Responsibility Determinations Using Structured Professional Judgment
Forensic psychologists commonly utilize unstructured clinical judgment in aggregating clinical and forensic information in forming opinions. Unstructured clinical judgment is prone to evaluator bias and suboptimal levels of inter-rater reliability. This article proposes Structured Professional Judgm...
Autores principales: | Acklin, Marvin W., Velasquez, Joseph P. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8313729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700991 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Instruction in information structuring improves Bayesian judgment in intelligence analysts
por: Mandel, David R.
Publicado: (2015) -
Responsibility problems for criminal justice
por: Jeppsson, Sofia M. I.
Publicado: (2014) -
Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet
por: Bigenwald, Ariane, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Workplace violence against Chinese health professionals 2013–2021: A study of national criminal judgment documents
por: Xiao, Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Determinants of Judgments of Explanatory Power: Credibility, Generality, and Statistical Relevance
por: Colombo, Matteo, et al.
Publicado: (2017)