Cargando…
Systematic review and meta-analysis of chest radiograph (CXR) findings in COVID-19
Chest radiography (CXR) is most likely to be the utilized modality for diagnosing COVID-19 and following up on any lung-associated abnormalities. This review provides a meta-analysis of the current literature on CXR imaging findings to determine the most common appearances of lung abnormalities in C...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8313779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.039 |
_version_ | 1783729414484262912 |
---|---|
author | Sadiq, Zuhair Rana, Shehroz Mahfoud, Ziyad Raoof, Ameed |
author_facet | Sadiq, Zuhair Rana, Shehroz Mahfoud, Ziyad Raoof, Ameed |
author_sort | Sadiq, Zuhair |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chest radiography (CXR) is most likely to be the utilized modality for diagnosing COVID-19 and following up on any lung-associated abnormalities. This review provides a meta-analysis of the current literature on CXR imaging findings to determine the most common appearances of lung abnormalities in COVID-19 patients in order to equip medical researchers and healthcare professionals in their efforts to combat this pandemic. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The inclusion criteria consisted of: (1) published in English literature; (2) original research study; (3) sample size of at least 5 patients; (4) reporting clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients as well as CXR imaging features; and (5) noting the number of patients with each corresponding imaging feature. A total of 1948 patients were included in this study. To perform the meta-analysis, a random-effects model calculated the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals of abnormal CXR imaging findings. Seventy-four percent (74%) (95% CI: 51–92%) of patients with COVID-19 had an abnormal CXR at the initial time of diagnosis or sometime during the disease course. While there was no single feature on CXR that was diagnostic of COVID-19 viral pneumonia, a characteristic set of findings were obvious. The most common abnormalities were consolidation (28%, 95% CI: 8–54%) and ground-glass opacities (29%, 95% CI: 10–53%). The distribution was most frequently bilateral (43%, 95% CI: 27–60%), peripheral (51%, 95% CI: 36–66%), and basal zone (56%, 95% CI: 37–74%) predominant. Contrary to parenchymal abnormalities, pneumothorax (1%, 95% CI: 0–3%) and pleural effusions (6%, 95% CI: 1–16%) were rare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8313779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83137792021-07-27 Systematic review and meta-analysis of chest radiograph (CXR) findings in COVID-19 Sadiq, Zuhair Rana, Shehroz Mahfoud, Ziyad Raoof, Ameed Clin Imaging Cardiothoracic Imaging Chest radiography (CXR) is most likely to be the utilized modality for diagnosing COVID-19 and following up on any lung-associated abnormalities. This review provides a meta-analysis of the current literature on CXR imaging findings to determine the most common appearances of lung abnormalities in COVID-19 patients in order to equip medical researchers and healthcare professionals in their efforts to combat this pandemic. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The inclusion criteria consisted of: (1) published in English literature; (2) original research study; (3) sample size of at least 5 patients; (4) reporting clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients as well as CXR imaging features; and (5) noting the number of patients with each corresponding imaging feature. A total of 1948 patients were included in this study. To perform the meta-analysis, a random-effects model calculated the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals of abnormal CXR imaging findings. Seventy-four percent (74%) (95% CI: 51–92%) of patients with COVID-19 had an abnormal CXR at the initial time of diagnosis or sometime during the disease course. While there was no single feature on CXR that was diagnostic of COVID-19 viral pneumonia, a characteristic set of findings were obvious. The most common abnormalities were consolidation (28%, 95% CI: 8–54%) and ground-glass opacities (29%, 95% CI: 10–53%). The distribution was most frequently bilateral (43%, 95% CI: 27–60%), peripheral (51%, 95% CI: 36–66%), and basal zone (56%, 95% CI: 37–74%) predominant. Contrary to parenchymal abnormalities, pneumothorax (1%, 95% CI: 0–3%) and pleural effusions (6%, 95% CI: 1–16%) were rare. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-12 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8313779/ /pubmed/34364071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.039 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Cardiothoracic Imaging Sadiq, Zuhair Rana, Shehroz Mahfoud, Ziyad Raoof, Ameed Systematic review and meta-analysis of chest radiograph (CXR) findings in COVID-19 |
title | Systematic review and meta-analysis of chest radiograph (CXR) findings in COVID-19 |
title_full | Systematic review and meta-analysis of chest radiograph (CXR) findings in COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Systematic review and meta-analysis of chest radiograph (CXR) findings in COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review and meta-analysis of chest radiograph (CXR) findings in COVID-19 |
title_short | Systematic review and meta-analysis of chest radiograph (CXR) findings in COVID-19 |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of chest radiograph (cxr) findings in covid-19 |
topic | Cardiothoracic Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8313779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sadiqzuhair systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofchestradiographcxrfindingsincovid19 AT ranashehroz systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofchestradiographcxrfindingsincovid19 AT mahfoudziyad systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofchestradiographcxrfindingsincovid19 AT raoofameed systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofchestradiographcxrfindingsincovid19 |