Cargando…

Apical lymphadenectomy during low ligation of the IMA during rectosigmoid resection for cancer()

BACKGROUND: Low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery may decrease the risk of colorectal anastomotic ischemia compared to high ligation at its origin. Low ligation leaves apical nodes in situ and is therefore paired with apical lymphadenectomy. We sou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guidolin, Keegan, Covelli, Andrea, Chesney, Tyler R., Draginov, Arman, Chadi, Sami A., Quereshy, Fayez A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8313841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2021.06.002
_version_ 1783729427007406080
author Guidolin, Keegan
Covelli, Andrea
Chesney, Tyler R.
Draginov, Arman
Chadi, Sami A.
Quereshy, Fayez A.
author_facet Guidolin, Keegan
Covelli, Andrea
Chesney, Tyler R.
Draginov, Arman
Chadi, Sami A.
Quereshy, Fayez A.
author_sort Guidolin, Keegan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery may decrease the risk of colorectal anastomotic ischemia compared to high ligation at its origin. Low ligation leaves apical nodes in situ and is therefore paired with apical lymphadenectomy. We sought to compare relevant oncologic outcomes between high ligation and low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy in rectosigmoid resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Patients receiving a rectosigmoid resection for cancer between January 2012 and July 2018 were included. Patients with metastatic disease and those who underwent low ligation without apical lymphadenectomy were excluded. Our primary outcome was nodal yield/metastasis. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, local recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients underwent high ligation and 89 low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy (median follow-up 20 months). In the low-ligation group, a median of 2 (interquartile range = 1–3) apical nodes was resected; 4.1% were malignant, increasing pathologic stage in 25% of these patients. There were no differences in nodal yield, complications, anastomotic leak, local recurrence, or overall survival. CONCLUSION: No differences were identified between high ligation and low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy with respect to relevant clinical outcomes. Prospective trial data are needed to robustly establish the oncologic benefit and safety of the low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8313841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83138412021-07-31 Apical lymphadenectomy during low ligation of the IMA during rectosigmoid resection for cancer() Guidolin, Keegan Covelli, Andrea Chesney, Tyler R. Draginov, Arman Chadi, Sami A. Quereshy, Fayez A. Surg Open Sci Article BACKGROUND: Low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery may decrease the risk of colorectal anastomotic ischemia compared to high ligation at its origin. Low ligation leaves apical nodes in situ and is therefore paired with apical lymphadenectomy. We sought to compare relevant oncologic outcomes between high ligation and low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy in rectosigmoid resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Patients receiving a rectosigmoid resection for cancer between January 2012 and July 2018 were included. Patients with metastatic disease and those who underwent low ligation without apical lymphadenectomy were excluded. Our primary outcome was nodal yield/metastasis. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, local recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients underwent high ligation and 89 low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy (median follow-up 20 months). In the low-ligation group, a median of 2 (interquartile range = 1–3) apical nodes was resected; 4.1% were malignant, increasing pathologic stage in 25% of these patients. There were no differences in nodal yield, complications, anastomotic leak, local recurrence, or overall survival. CONCLUSION: No differences were identified between high ligation and low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy with respect to relevant clinical outcomes. Prospective trial data are needed to robustly establish the oncologic benefit and safety of the low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy technique. Elsevier 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8313841/ /pubmed/34337371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2021.06.002 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guidolin, Keegan
Covelli, Andrea
Chesney, Tyler R.
Draginov, Arman
Chadi, Sami A.
Quereshy, Fayez A.
Apical lymphadenectomy during low ligation of the IMA during rectosigmoid resection for cancer()
title Apical lymphadenectomy during low ligation of the IMA during rectosigmoid resection for cancer()
title_full Apical lymphadenectomy during low ligation of the IMA during rectosigmoid resection for cancer()
title_fullStr Apical lymphadenectomy during low ligation of the IMA during rectosigmoid resection for cancer()
title_full_unstemmed Apical lymphadenectomy during low ligation of the IMA during rectosigmoid resection for cancer()
title_short Apical lymphadenectomy during low ligation of the IMA during rectosigmoid resection for cancer()
title_sort apical lymphadenectomy during low ligation of the ima during rectosigmoid resection for cancer()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8313841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2021.06.002
work_keys_str_mv AT guidolinkeegan apicallymphadenectomyduringlowligationoftheimaduringrectosigmoidresectionforcancer
AT covelliandrea apicallymphadenectomyduringlowligationoftheimaduringrectosigmoidresectionforcancer
AT chesneytylerr apicallymphadenectomyduringlowligationoftheimaduringrectosigmoidresectionforcancer
AT draginovarman apicallymphadenectomyduringlowligationoftheimaduringrectosigmoidresectionforcancer
AT chadisamia apicallymphadenectomyduringlowligationoftheimaduringrectosigmoidresectionforcancer
AT quereshyfayeza apicallymphadenectomyduringlowligationoftheimaduringrectosigmoidresectionforcancer