Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among employees of a university hospital in Belgium during the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak (COVEMUZ-study)

Between 19 May and 12 June 2020, employees of the UZ Brussel were recruited in this study aiming to document the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence, to investigate the potential work-related risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and to estimate the proportion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Geyter, Deborah, Vancutsem, Ellen, Van Laere, Sven, Piérard, Denis, Lacor, Patrick, Weets, Ilse, Allard, Sabine D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34219629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821001540
_version_ 1783729470693179392
author De Geyter, Deborah
Vancutsem, Ellen
Van Laere, Sven
Piérard, Denis
Lacor, Patrick
Weets, Ilse
Allard, Sabine D.
author_facet De Geyter, Deborah
Vancutsem, Ellen
Van Laere, Sven
Piérard, Denis
Lacor, Patrick
Weets, Ilse
Allard, Sabine D.
author_sort De Geyter, Deborah
collection PubMed
description Between 19 May and 12 June 2020, employees of the UZ Brussel were recruited in this study aiming to document the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence, to investigate the potential work-related risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and to estimate the proportion of asymptomatic infections. In total, 2662 participants were included of whom 7.4% had immunoglobulin G antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Of the participants reporting a positive polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2, 89% had antibodies at the time of blood sampling. Eleven per cent of the antibody positive participants reported no recent symptoms suggestive of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Participants reporting fever, chest pain and/or anosmia/ageusia were significantly more frequently associated with the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The presence of antibodies was highest in the group that had had contact with COVID-19-infected individuals outside the hospital with or without using appropriate personnel protective equipment (PPE) (P < 0.001). Inside the hospital, a statistically significant difference was observed for the employees considered as low-risk exposure compared to the intermediate-risk exposure group (P = 0.005) as well as the high-risk exposure group compared to the intermediate exposure risk group (P < 0.001). These findings highlight the importance of using correct PPE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8314061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83140612021-08-02 SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among employees of a university hospital in Belgium during the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak (COVEMUZ-study) De Geyter, Deborah Vancutsem, Ellen Van Laere, Sven Piérard, Denis Lacor, Patrick Weets, Ilse Allard, Sabine D. Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Between 19 May and 12 June 2020, employees of the UZ Brussel were recruited in this study aiming to document the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence, to investigate the potential work-related risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and to estimate the proportion of asymptomatic infections. In total, 2662 participants were included of whom 7.4% had immunoglobulin G antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Of the participants reporting a positive polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2, 89% had antibodies at the time of blood sampling. Eleven per cent of the antibody positive participants reported no recent symptoms suggestive of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Participants reporting fever, chest pain and/or anosmia/ageusia were significantly more frequently associated with the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The presence of antibodies was highest in the group that had had contact with COVID-19-infected individuals outside the hospital with or without using appropriate personnel protective equipment (PPE) (P < 0.001). Inside the hospital, a statistically significant difference was observed for the employees considered as low-risk exposure compared to the intermediate-risk exposure group (P = 0.005) as well as the high-risk exposure group compared to the intermediate exposure risk group (P < 0.001). These findings highlight the importance of using correct PPE. Cambridge University Press 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8314061/ /pubmed/34219629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821001540 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
De Geyter, Deborah
Vancutsem, Ellen
Van Laere, Sven
Piérard, Denis
Lacor, Patrick
Weets, Ilse
Allard, Sabine D.
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among employees of a university hospital in Belgium during the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak (COVEMUZ-study)
title SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among employees of a university hospital in Belgium during the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak (COVEMUZ-study)
title_full SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among employees of a university hospital in Belgium during the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak (COVEMUZ-study)
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among employees of a university hospital in Belgium during the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak (COVEMUZ-study)
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among employees of a university hospital in Belgium during the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak (COVEMUZ-study)
title_short SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among employees of a university hospital in Belgium during the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak (COVEMUZ-study)
title_sort sars-cov-2 seroprevalence among employees of a university hospital in belgium during the 2020 covid-19 outbreak (covemuz-study)
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34219629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821001540
work_keys_str_mv AT degeyterdeborah sarscov2seroprevalenceamongemployeesofauniversityhospitalinbelgiumduringthe2020covid19outbreakcovemuzstudy
AT vancutsemellen sarscov2seroprevalenceamongemployeesofauniversityhospitalinbelgiumduringthe2020covid19outbreakcovemuzstudy
AT vanlaeresven sarscov2seroprevalenceamongemployeesofauniversityhospitalinbelgiumduringthe2020covid19outbreakcovemuzstudy
AT pierarddenis sarscov2seroprevalenceamongemployeesofauniversityhospitalinbelgiumduringthe2020covid19outbreakcovemuzstudy
AT lacorpatrick sarscov2seroprevalenceamongemployeesofauniversityhospitalinbelgiumduringthe2020covid19outbreakcovemuzstudy
AT weetsilse sarscov2seroprevalenceamongemployeesofauniversityhospitalinbelgiumduringthe2020covid19outbreakcovemuzstudy
AT allardsabined sarscov2seroprevalenceamongemployeesofauniversityhospitalinbelgiumduringthe2020covid19outbreakcovemuzstudy