Cargando…

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effects of using Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ECSWT) and phonophoresis therapy on pain and neck disability in patients with neck myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). METHODS: Forty eligible patients were randomly divided into two groups of ECSWT (received...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taheri, Parisa, Naderi, Marzie, Khosravi, Saeid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336620
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.112592
_version_ 1783729477747998720
author Taheri, Parisa
Naderi, Marzie
Khosravi, Saeid
author_facet Taheri, Parisa
Naderi, Marzie
Khosravi, Saeid
author_sort Taheri, Parisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effects of using Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ECSWT) and phonophoresis therapy on pain and neck disability in patients with neck myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). METHODS: Forty eligible patients were randomly divided into two groups of ECSWT (received three sessions of ECSWT, once a week for three weeks) and phonophoresis (received ultrasound using hydrocortisone gel 1% over the trigger point on trapezius muscle, three times a week for three weeks). Patients in both groups received the same stretching exercise program and drug regimen during the intervention. RESULTS: Pain and NDI scores in both groups were significantly improved at the end of the treatment and four weeks later. At the end of the treatment, the pain score was similar between the groups. Four weeks after the treatment, the pain score in the ECSWT group was significantly lower than in the phonophoresis group (P-value = 0.030). The NDI score was not significantly different between the groups at the end of the treatment. However, four weeks after the treatment, the NDI score was significantly lower in the ECSWT group than in the phonophoresis group (P-value=0.032). The trend of changes in the pain and NDI scores was not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both phonophoresis and ECSWT groups effectively decreased pain and neck disability in patients with MPS, with the superiority of ECSWT with a more lasting effect for a month after the end of the treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8314093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83140932021-07-29 Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial Taheri, Parisa Naderi, Marzie Khosravi, Saeid Anesth Pain Med Research Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effects of using Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ECSWT) and phonophoresis therapy on pain and neck disability in patients with neck myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). METHODS: Forty eligible patients were randomly divided into two groups of ECSWT (received three sessions of ECSWT, once a week for three weeks) and phonophoresis (received ultrasound using hydrocortisone gel 1% over the trigger point on trapezius muscle, three times a week for three weeks). Patients in both groups received the same stretching exercise program and drug regimen during the intervention. RESULTS: Pain and NDI scores in both groups were significantly improved at the end of the treatment and four weeks later. At the end of the treatment, the pain score was similar between the groups. Four weeks after the treatment, the pain score in the ECSWT group was significantly lower than in the phonophoresis group (P-value = 0.030). The NDI score was not significantly different between the groups at the end of the treatment. However, four weeks after the treatment, the NDI score was significantly lower in the ECSWT group than in the phonophoresis group (P-value=0.032). The trend of changes in the pain and NDI scores was not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both phonophoresis and ECSWT groups effectively decreased pain and neck disability in patients with MPS, with the superiority of ECSWT with a more lasting effect for a month after the end of the treatment. Kowsar 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8314093/ /pubmed/34336620 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.112592 Text en Copyright © 2021, Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Taheri, Parisa
Naderi, Marzie
Khosravi, Saeid
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus phonophoresis therapy for neck myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336620
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.112592
work_keys_str_mv AT taheriparisa extracorporealshockwavetherapyversusphonophoresistherapyforneckmyofascialpainsyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT naderimarzie extracorporealshockwavetherapyversusphonophoresistherapyforneckmyofascialpainsyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT khosravisaeid extracorporealshockwavetherapyversusphonophoresistherapyforneckmyofascialpainsyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial