Cargando…

Working with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing

BACKGROUND: Replacement, reduction and refinement, the 3R principles, provide a framework to minimize the use and suffering of animals in science. In this context, we aimed to determine the actual perception that individuals working with laboratory rodents in biomedical research have on animal welfa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goñi-Balentziaga, Olatz, Ortega-Saez, Iván, Vila, Sergi, Azkona, Garikoitz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34315536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42826-021-00098-w
_version_ 1783729552990666752
author Goñi-Balentziaga, Olatz
Ortega-Saez, Iván
Vila, Sergi
Azkona, Garikoitz
author_facet Goñi-Balentziaga, Olatz
Ortega-Saez, Iván
Vila, Sergi
Azkona, Garikoitz
author_sort Goñi-Balentziaga, Olatz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Replacement, reduction and refinement, the 3R principles, provide a framework to minimize the use and suffering of animals in science. In this context, we aimed to determine the actual perception that individuals working with laboratory rodents in biomedical research have on animal welfare and on their interaction with the animals, as well as how they perceive its impact on their social relations. To this end, we designed an anonymous on-line survey for people working with rodents, at three responsibility levels, in Spain. RESULTS: Of the 356 participants, 239 were women (67 %); 263 were researchers (74 %), and 93 animal facility staff (26 %), of which 55 were caretakers/technicians (15 %), and 38 welfare officer/veterinarians (11 %). Animal facility staff indicated environmental enrichment to be a universal practice. About half of the participants reported that, in their opinion, animals suffer “little to none” or “minor” stress and pain. Animal caretakers/technicians and researchers perceived higher levels of stress and pain than welfare officers/veterinarians. Participants judged decapitation the most unpleasant method to kill rodents, whereas anaesthetic overdose was the least one. A sizable proportion − 21 % of animal caretakers/technicians and 11.4 % of researchers - stated that they were never given the choice not to euthanize the rodents they work with. Overall, women reported higher interactions with animals than men. Nevertheless, we could detect a significant correlation between time spent with the animals and interaction scores. Notably, 80 % of animal facility staff and 92 % of researchers rarely talked about their work with laboratory rodents with people outside their inner social circle. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the participants showed high awareness and sensitivity to rodent wellbeing; animal facility staff reported a similar perception on welfare questions, independently of their category, while researchers, who spent less time with the animals, showed less awareness and manifested lower human-animal interaction and less social support. Regarding the perception on social acceptance of laboratory animal work, all groups were cautious and rarely talked about their job, suggesting that it is considered a sensitive issue in Spain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42826-021-00098-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8314439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83144392021-07-27 Working with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing Goñi-Balentziaga, Olatz Ortega-Saez, Iván Vila, Sergi Azkona, Garikoitz Lab Anim Res Research BACKGROUND: Replacement, reduction and refinement, the 3R principles, provide a framework to minimize the use and suffering of animals in science. In this context, we aimed to determine the actual perception that individuals working with laboratory rodents in biomedical research have on animal welfare and on their interaction with the animals, as well as how they perceive its impact on their social relations. To this end, we designed an anonymous on-line survey for people working with rodents, at three responsibility levels, in Spain. RESULTS: Of the 356 participants, 239 were women (67 %); 263 were researchers (74 %), and 93 animal facility staff (26 %), of which 55 were caretakers/technicians (15 %), and 38 welfare officer/veterinarians (11 %). Animal facility staff indicated environmental enrichment to be a universal practice. About half of the participants reported that, in their opinion, animals suffer “little to none” or “minor” stress and pain. Animal caretakers/technicians and researchers perceived higher levels of stress and pain than welfare officers/veterinarians. Participants judged decapitation the most unpleasant method to kill rodents, whereas anaesthetic overdose was the least one. A sizable proportion − 21 % of animal caretakers/technicians and 11.4 % of researchers - stated that they were never given the choice not to euthanize the rodents they work with. Overall, women reported higher interactions with animals than men. Nevertheless, we could detect a significant correlation between time spent with the animals and interaction scores. Notably, 80 % of animal facility staff and 92 % of researchers rarely talked about their work with laboratory rodents with people outside their inner social circle. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the participants showed high awareness and sensitivity to rodent wellbeing; animal facility staff reported a similar perception on welfare questions, independently of their category, while researchers, who spent less time with the animals, showed less awareness and manifested lower human-animal interaction and less social support. Regarding the perception on social acceptance of laboratory animal work, all groups were cautious and rarely talked about their job, suggesting that it is considered a sensitive issue in Spain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42826-021-00098-w. BioMed Central 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8314439/ /pubmed/34315536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42826-021-00098-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Goñi-Balentziaga, Olatz
Ortega-Saez, Iván
Vila, Sergi
Azkona, Garikoitz
Working with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing
title Working with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing
title_full Working with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing
title_fullStr Working with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing
title_full_unstemmed Working with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing
title_short Working with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing
title_sort working with laboratory rodents in spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34315536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42826-021-00098-w
work_keys_str_mv AT gonibalentziagaolatz workingwithlaboratoryrodentsinspainasurveyonwelfareandwellbeing
AT ortegasaezivan workingwithlaboratoryrodentsinspainasurveyonwelfareandwellbeing
AT vilasergi workingwithlaboratoryrodentsinspainasurveyonwelfareandwellbeing
AT azkonagarikoitz workingwithlaboratoryrodentsinspainasurveyonwelfareandwellbeing