Cargando…

Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery and evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hennings, Louise Inkeri, Sørensen, Jette Led, Hybscmann, Jane, Strandbygaard, Jeanett
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34311735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w
_version_ 1783729577954115584
author Hennings, Louise Inkeri
Sørensen, Jette Led
Hybscmann, Jane
Strandbygaard, Jeanett
author_facet Hennings, Louise Inkeri
Sørensen, Jette Led
Hybscmann, Jane
Strandbygaard, Jeanett
author_sort Hennings, Louise Inkeri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery and evaluate the measurement characteristics of each tool. METHOD: We utilized the scoping review methodology and searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were studies that analysed assessment tools in live gynaecologic surgery. Kane’s validity argument was applied to evaluate the assessment tools in the included studies. RESULTS: Eight studies out of the 544 identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The assessment tools were categorised as global rating scales, global and procedure rating scales combined, procedure-specific rating scales or as a non-procedure-specific error assessment tool. CONCLUSION: This scoping review presents the current different tools for observational assessment of technical skills in intraoperative, gynaecologic surgery. This scoping review can serve as a guide for surgical educators who want to apply a scale or a specific tool in surgical assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8314568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83145682021-07-28 Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review Hennings, Louise Inkeri Sørensen, Jette Led Hybscmann, Jane Strandbygaard, Jeanett BMC Med Educ Review BACKGROUND: Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery and evaluate the measurement characteristics of each tool. METHOD: We utilized the scoping review methodology and searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were studies that analysed assessment tools in live gynaecologic surgery. Kane’s validity argument was applied to evaluate the assessment tools in the included studies. RESULTS: Eight studies out of the 544 identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The assessment tools were categorised as global rating scales, global and procedure rating scales combined, procedure-specific rating scales or as a non-procedure-specific error assessment tool. CONCLUSION: This scoping review presents the current different tools for observational assessment of technical skills in intraoperative, gynaecologic surgery. This scoping review can serve as a guide for surgical educators who want to apply a scale or a specific tool in surgical assessment. BioMed Central 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8314568/ /pubmed/34311735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Hennings, Louise Inkeri
Sørensen, Jette Led
Hybscmann, Jane
Strandbygaard, Jeanett
Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
title Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
title_full Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
title_fullStr Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
title_short Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
title_sort tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34311735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w
work_keys_str_mv AT henningslouiseinkeri toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview
AT sørensenjetteled toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview
AT hybscmannjane toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview
AT strandbygaardjeanett toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview