Cargando…
Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery and evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34311735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w |
_version_ | 1783729577954115584 |
---|---|
author | Hennings, Louise Inkeri Sørensen, Jette Led Hybscmann, Jane Strandbygaard, Jeanett |
author_facet | Hennings, Louise Inkeri Sørensen, Jette Led Hybscmann, Jane Strandbygaard, Jeanett |
author_sort | Hennings, Louise Inkeri |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery and evaluate the measurement characteristics of each tool. METHOD: We utilized the scoping review methodology and searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were studies that analysed assessment tools in live gynaecologic surgery. Kane’s validity argument was applied to evaluate the assessment tools in the included studies. RESULTS: Eight studies out of the 544 identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The assessment tools were categorised as global rating scales, global and procedure rating scales combined, procedure-specific rating scales or as a non-procedure-specific error assessment tool. CONCLUSION: This scoping review presents the current different tools for observational assessment of technical skills in intraoperative, gynaecologic surgery. This scoping review can serve as a guide for surgical educators who want to apply a scale or a specific tool in surgical assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8314568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83145682021-07-28 Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review Hennings, Louise Inkeri Sørensen, Jette Led Hybscmann, Jane Strandbygaard, Jeanett BMC Med Educ Review BACKGROUND: Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery and evaluate the measurement characteristics of each tool. METHOD: We utilized the scoping review methodology and searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were studies that analysed assessment tools in live gynaecologic surgery. Kane’s validity argument was applied to evaluate the assessment tools in the included studies. RESULTS: Eight studies out of the 544 identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The assessment tools were categorised as global rating scales, global and procedure rating scales combined, procedure-specific rating scales or as a non-procedure-specific error assessment tool. CONCLUSION: This scoping review presents the current different tools for observational assessment of technical skills in intraoperative, gynaecologic surgery. This scoping review can serve as a guide for surgical educators who want to apply a scale or a specific tool in surgical assessment. BioMed Central 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8314568/ /pubmed/34311735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Hennings, Louise Inkeri Sørensen, Jette Led Hybscmann, Jane Strandbygaard, Jeanett Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
title | Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
title_full | Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
title_short | Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
title_sort | tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34311735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henningslouiseinkeri toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview AT sørensenjetteled toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview AT hybscmannjane toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview AT strandbygaardjeanett toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview |