Cargando…

Review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait

BACKGROUND: Many lower-limb exoskeletons have been developed to assist gait, exhibiting a large range of control methods. The goal of this paper is to review and classify these control strategies, that determine how these devices interact with the user. METHODS: In addition to covering the recent pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baud, Romain, Manzoori, Ali Reza, Ijspeert, Auke, Bouri, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34315499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00906-3
_version_ 1783729580333334528
author Baud, Romain
Manzoori, Ali Reza
Ijspeert, Auke
Bouri, Mohamed
author_facet Baud, Romain
Manzoori, Ali Reza
Ijspeert, Auke
Bouri, Mohamed
author_sort Baud, Romain
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many lower-limb exoskeletons have been developed to assist gait, exhibiting a large range of control methods. The goal of this paper is to review and classify these control strategies, that determine how these devices interact with the user. METHODS: In addition to covering the recent publications on the control of lower-limb exoskeletons for gait assistance, an effort has been made to review the controllers independently of the hardware and implementation aspects. The common 3-level structure (high, middle, and low levels) is first used to separate the continuous behavior (mid-level) from the implementation of position/torque control (low-level) and the detection of the terrain or user’s intention (high-level). Within these levels, different approaches (functional units) have been identified and combined to describe each considered controller. RESULTS: 291 references have been considered and sorted by the proposed classification. The methods identified in the high-level are manual user input, brain interfaces, or automatic mode detection based on the terrain or user’s movements. In the mid-level, the synchronization is most often based on manual triggers by the user, discrete events (followed by state machines or time-based progression), or continuous estimations using state variables. The desired action is determined based on position/torque profiles, model-based calculations, or other custom functions of the sensory signals. In the low-level, position or torque controllers are used to carry out the desired actions. In addition to a more detailed description of these methods, the variants of implementation within each one are also compared and discussed in the paper. CONCLUSIONS: By listing and comparing the features of the reviewed controllers, this work can help in understanding the numerous techniques found in the literature. The main identified trends are the use of pre-defined trajectories for full-mobilization and event-triggered (or adaptive-frequency-oscillator-synchronized) torque profiles for partial assistance. More recently, advanced methods to adapt the position/torque profiles online and automatically detect terrains or locomotion modes have become more common, but these are largely still limited to laboratory settings. An analysis of the possible underlying reasons of the identified trends is also carried out and opportunities for further studies are discussed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-021-00906-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8314580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83145802021-07-28 Review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait Baud, Romain Manzoori, Ali Reza Ijspeert, Auke Bouri, Mohamed J Neuroeng Rehabil Review BACKGROUND: Many lower-limb exoskeletons have been developed to assist gait, exhibiting a large range of control methods. The goal of this paper is to review and classify these control strategies, that determine how these devices interact with the user. METHODS: In addition to covering the recent publications on the control of lower-limb exoskeletons for gait assistance, an effort has been made to review the controllers independently of the hardware and implementation aspects. The common 3-level structure (high, middle, and low levels) is first used to separate the continuous behavior (mid-level) from the implementation of position/torque control (low-level) and the detection of the terrain or user’s intention (high-level). Within these levels, different approaches (functional units) have been identified and combined to describe each considered controller. RESULTS: 291 references have been considered and sorted by the proposed classification. The methods identified in the high-level are manual user input, brain interfaces, or automatic mode detection based on the terrain or user’s movements. In the mid-level, the synchronization is most often based on manual triggers by the user, discrete events (followed by state machines or time-based progression), or continuous estimations using state variables. The desired action is determined based on position/torque profiles, model-based calculations, or other custom functions of the sensory signals. In the low-level, position or torque controllers are used to carry out the desired actions. In addition to a more detailed description of these methods, the variants of implementation within each one are also compared and discussed in the paper. CONCLUSIONS: By listing and comparing the features of the reviewed controllers, this work can help in understanding the numerous techniques found in the literature. The main identified trends are the use of pre-defined trajectories for full-mobilization and event-triggered (or adaptive-frequency-oscillator-synchronized) torque profiles for partial assistance. More recently, advanced methods to adapt the position/torque profiles online and automatically detect terrains or locomotion modes have become more common, but these are largely still limited to laboratory settings. An analysis of the possible underlying reasons of the identified trends is also carried out and opportunities for further studies are discussed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-021-00906-3. BioMed Central 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8314580/ /pubmed/34315499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00906-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Baud, Romain
Manzoori, Ali Reza
Ijspeert, Auke
Bouri, Mohamed
Review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait
title Review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait
title_full Review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait
title_fullStr Review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait
title_full_unstemmed Review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait
title_short Review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait
title_sort review of control strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons to assist gait
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34315499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00906-3
work_keys_str_mv AT baudromain reviewofcontrolstrategiesforlowerlimbexoskeletonstoassistgait
AT manzoorialireza reviewofcontrolstrategiesforlowerlimbexoskeletonstoassistgait
AT ijspeertauke reviewofcontrolstrategiesforlowerlimbexoskeletonstoassistgait
AT bourimohamed reviewofcontrolstrategiesforlowerlimbexoskeletonstoassistgait