Cargando…
Validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events
BACKGROUND: The psychometric properties of the simplified Chinese version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) have not been assessed. Therefore, we aimed to assess its validity, reliability, and responsiveness. PATIENTS AND METHO...
Autores principales: | Yang, Shan-Shan, Chen, Lei, Liu, Ying, Lu, Hai-Jun, Huang, Bo-Jie, Lin, Ai-Hua, Sun, Ying, Ma, Jun, Xie, Fang-Yun, Mao, Yan-Ping |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34315423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08610-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Linguistic validation of the simplified Chinese version of the US National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE™)
por: KKF, Cheng, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Cultural adaptation of the Italian version of the Patient-Reported
Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event
(PRO-CTCAE®)
por: Caminiti, Caterina, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Linguistic Validation of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Korean
por: Cho, Juhee, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Use and misuse of common terminology criteria for adverse events in cancer clinical trials
por: Zhang, Sheng, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Software for Administering the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: Usability Study
por: Schoen, Martin W, et al.
Publicado: (2018)