Cargando…

Quantitative Assessment of Viral Dispersion Associated with Respiratory Support Devices in a Simulated Critical Care Environment

Rationale: Patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) require supplemental oxygen and ventilatory support. It is unclear whether some respiratory support devices may increase the dispersion of infectious bioaerosols and thereby place healthcare workers at increased risk of infection with se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avari, Hamed, Hiebert, Ryan J., Ryzynski, Agnes A., Levy, Ariela, Nardi, Julie, Kanji-Jaffer, Hasina, Kiiza, Peter, Pinto, Ruxandra, Plenderleith, Simon W., Fowler, Robert A., Mbareche, Hamza, Mubareka, Samira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33534659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202008-3070OC
_version_ 1783729633906130944
author Avari, Hamed
Hiebert, Ryan J.
Ryzynski, Agnes A.
Levy, Ariela
Nardi, Julie
Kanji-Jaffer, Hasina
Kiiza, Peter
Pinto, Ruxandra
Plenderleith, Simon W.
Fowler, Robert A.
Mbareche, Hamza
Mubareka, Samira
author_facet Avari, Hamed
Hiebert, Ryan J.
Ryzynski, Agnes A.
Levy, Ariela
Nardi, Julie
Kanji-Jaffer, Hasina
Kiiza, Peter
Pinto, Ruxandra
Plenderleith, Simon W.
Fowler, Robert A.
Mbareche, Hamza
Mubareka, Samira
author_sort Avari, Hamed
collection PubMed
description Rationale: Patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) require supplemental oxygen and ventilatory support. It is unclear whether some respiratory support devices may increase the dispersion of infectious bioaerosols and thereby place healthcare workers at increased risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Objectives: To quantitatively compare viral dispersion from invasive and noninvasive respiratory support modalities. Methods: This study used a simulated ICU room with a breathing-patient simulator exhaling nebulized bacteriophages from the lower respiratory tract with various respiratory support modalities: invasive ventilation (through an endotracheal tube with an inflated cuff connected to a mechanical ventilator), helmet ventilation with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) valve, noninvasive bilevel positive-pressure ventilation, nonrebreather face masks, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), and nasal prongs. Measurements and Main Results: Invasive ventilation and helmet ventilation with a PEEP valve were associated with the lowest bacteriophage concentrations in the air, and HFNO and nasal prongs were associated with the highest concentrations. At the intubating position, bacteriophage concentrations associated with HFNO (2.66 × 10(4) plaque-forming units [PFU]/L of air sampled), nasal prongs (1.60 × 10(4) PFU/L of air sampled), nonrebreather face masks (7.87 × 10(2) PFU/L of air sampled), and bilevel positive airway pressure (1.91 × 10(2) PFU/L of air sampled) were significantly higher than those associated with invasive ventilation (P < 0.05 for each). The difference between bacteriophage concentrations associated with helmet ventilation with a PEEP valve (4.29 × 10(–1) PFU/L of air sampled) and bacteriophage concentrations associated with invasive ventilation was not statistically significant. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential differential risk of dispersing virus among respiratory support devices and the importance of appropriate infection prevention and control practices and personal protective equipment for healthcare workers when caring for patients with transmissible respiratory viral infections such as SARS-CoV-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8314904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83149042021-07-27 Quantitative Assessment of Viral Dispersion Associated with Respiratory Support Devices in a Simulated Critical Care Environment Avari, Hamed Hiebert, Ryan J. Ryzynski, Agnes A. Levy, Ariela Nardi, Julie Kanji-Jaffer, Hasina Kiiza, Peter Pinto, Ruxandra Plenderleith, Simon W. Fowler, Robert A. Mbareche, Hamza Mubareka, Samira Am J Respir Crit Care Med Original Articles Rationale: Patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) require supplemental oxygen and ventilatory support. It is unclear whether some respiratory support devices may increase the dispersion of infectious bioaerosols and thereby place healthcare workers at increased risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Objectives: To quantitatively compare viral dispersion from invasive and noninvasive respiratory support modalities. Methods: This study used a simulated ICU room with a breathing-patient simulator exhaling nebulized bacteriophages from the lower respiratory tract with various respiratory support modalities: invasive ventilation (through an endotracheal tube with an inflated cuff connected to a mechanical ventilator), helmet ventilation with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) valve, noninvasive bilevel positive-pressure ventilation, nonrebreather face masks, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), and nasal prongs. Measurements and Main Results: Invasive ventilation and helmet ventilation with a PEEP valve were associated with the lowest bacteriophage concentrations in the air, and HFNO and nasal prongs were associated with the highest concentrations. At the intubating position, bacteriophage concentrations associated with HFNO (2.66 × 10(4) plaque-forming units [PFU]/L of air sampled), nasal prongs (1.60 × 10(4) PFU/L of air sampled), nonrebreather face masks (7.87 × 10(2) PFU/L of air sampled), and bilevel positive airway pressure (1.91 × 10(2) PFU/L of air sampled) were significantly higher than those associated with invasive ventilation (P < 0.05 for each). The difference between bacteriophage concentrations associated with helmet ventilation with a PEEP valve (4.29 × 10(–1) PFU/L of air sampled) and bacteriophage concentrations associated with invasive ventilation was not statistically significant. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential differential risk of dispersing virus among respiratory support devices and the importance of appropriate infection prevention and control practices and personal protective equipment for healthcare workers when caring for patients with transmissible respiratory viral infections such as SARS-CoV-2. American Thoracic Society 2021-05-01 2021-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8314904/ /pubmed/33534659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202008-3070OC Text en Copyright © 2021 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). For commercial usage and reprints, please contact Diane Gern (dgern@thoracic.org).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Avari, Hamed
Hiebert, Ryan J.
Ryzynski, Agnes A.
Levy, Ariela
Nardi, Julie
Kanji-Jaffer, Hasina
Kiiza, Peter
Pinto, Ruxandra
Plenderleith, Simon W.
Fowler, Robert A.
Mbareche, Hamza
Mubareka, Samira
Quantitative Assessment of Viral Dispersion Associated with Respiratory Support Devices in a Simulated Critical Care Environment
title Quantitative Assessment of Viral Dispersion Associated with Respiratory Support Devices in a Simulated Critical Care Environment
title_full Quantitative Assessment of Viral Dispersion Associated with Respiratory Support Devices in a Simulated Critical Care Environment
title_fullStr Quantitative Assessment of Viral Dispersion Associated with Respiratory Support Devices in a Simulated Critical Care Environment
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Assessment of Viral Dispersion Associated with Respiratory Support Devices in a Simulated Critical Care Environment
title_short Quantitative Assessment of Viral Dispersion Associated with Respiratory Support Devices in a Simulated Critical Care Environment
title_sort quantitative assessment of viral dispersion associated with respiratory support devices in a simulated critical care environment
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33534659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202008-3070OC
work_keys_str_mv AT avarihamed quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment
AT hiebertryanj quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment
AT ryzynskiagnesa quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment
AT levyariela quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment
AT nardijulie quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment
AT kanjijafferhasina quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment
AT kiizapeter quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment
AT pintoruxandra quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment
AT plenderleithsimonw quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment
AT fowlerroberta quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment
AT mbarechehamza quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment
AT mubarekasamira quantitativeassessmentofviraldispersionassociatedwithrespiratorysupportdevicesinasimulatedcriticalcareenvironment