Cargando…
Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review
BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the fourth most common malignancy in women worldwide and the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. The endometrioid subtype has an excellent prognosis with conventional treatment; however, recurrence reduces overall survival. OBJECTIVE: Descr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322276 http://dx.doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2019-3 |
_version_ | 1783729670520307712 |
---|---|
author | Hernández, J. Edgardo González-Montiel, Ailyn Allos-Villalva, Jesús C. Ceb Cantú, David Barquet, Salim Olivares-Mundo, Anny Herrera, Luis A. Prada, Diddier |
author_facet | Hernández, J. Edgardo González-Montiel, Ailyn Allos-Villalva, Jesús C. Ceb Cantú, David Barquet, Salim Olivares-Mundo, Anny Herrera, Luis A. Prada, Diddier |
author_sort | Hernández, J. Edgardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the fourth most common malignancy in women worldwide and the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. The endometrioid subtype has an excellent prognosis with conventional treatment; however, recurrence reduces overall survival. OBJECTIVE: Describe the most relevant evidence regarding selected potential molecular biomarkers that may predict overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in EC. METHODS: An exhaustive search was performed in PUBMED with the search terms endometrial cancer, molecular biomarker, and survival. We selected original articles written in English about endometrial cancer, molecular biomarkers, and that included survival analysis published between January 2000 and December 2016. RESULTS: Several molecular prognostic biomarkers have been studied in terms of survival and therapeutic response in women with endometrial cancer; hormone receptors, microRNAs, and other molecules have emerged as potentially useful biomarkers, including HER2, p21, HE4, PTEN, p27, ANCCA, and ANXA2. CONCLUSIONS: The use of biomarkers in the assessment of OS, RFS, and CSS requires large trials to expand our understanding of endometrial carcinogenesis. Several molecular markers are significantly associated with a high tumor grade and advanced clinical stage in EC and, therefore, could have additive effects when combined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8315102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83151022021-07-27 Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review Hernández, J. Edgardo González-Montiel, Ailyn Allos-Villalva, Jesús C. Ceb Cantú, David Barquet, Salim Olivares-Mundo, Anny Herrera, Luis A. Prada, Diddier J Cancer Res Ther (Manch) Article BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the fourth most common malignancy in women worldwide and the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. The endometrioid subtype has an excellent prognosis with conventional treatment; however, recurrence reduces overall survival. OBJECTIVE: Describe the most relevant evidence regarding selected potential molecular biomarkers that may predict overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in EC. METHODS: An exhaustive search was performed in PUBMED with the search terms endometrial cancer, molecular biomarker, and survival. We selected original articles written in English about endometrial cancer, molecular biomarkers, and that included survival analysis published between January 2000 and December 2016. RESULTS: Several molecular prognostic biomarkers have been studied in terms of survival and therapeutic response in women with endometrial cancer; hormone receptors, microRNAs, and other molecules have emerged as potentially useful biomarkers, including HER2, p21, HE4, PTEN, p27, ANCCA, and ANXA2. CONCLUSIONS: The use of biomarkers in the assessment of OS, RFS, and CSS requires large trials to expand our understanding of endometrial carcinogenesis. Several molecular markers are significantly associated with a high tumor grade and advanced clinical stage in EC and, therefore, could have additive effects when combined. 2019-12-03 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8315102/ /pubmed/34322276 http://dx.doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2019-3 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Hernández, J. Edgardo González-Montiel, Ailyn Allos-Villalva, Jesús C. Ceb Cantú, David Barquet, Salim Olivares-Mundo, Anny Herrera, Luis A. Prada, Diddier Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review |
title | Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review |
title_full | Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review |
title_fullStr | Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review |
title_short | Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review |
title_sort | prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: a review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322276 http://dx.doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2019-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hernandezjedgardo prognosticmolecularbiomarkersinendometrialcancerareview AT gonzalezmontielailyn prognosticmolecularbiomarkersinendometrialcancerareview AT allosvillalvajesuscceb prognosticmolecularbiomarkersinendometrialcancerareview AT cantudavid prognosticmolecularbiomarkersinendometrialcancerareview AT barquetsalim prognosticmolecularbiomarkersinendometrialcancerareview AT olivaresmundoanny prognosticmolecularbiomarkersinendometrialcancerareview AT herreraluisa prognosticmolecularbiomarkersinendometrialcancerareview AT pradadiddier prognosticmolecularbiomarkersinendometrialcancerareview |