Cargando…

Antispasmodics for Chronic Abdominal Pain: Analysis of North American Treatment Options

Chronic abdominal pain is a common gastrointestinal (GI) symptom that characterizes many functional GI disorders/disorders of gut-brain interaction, including irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, and centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome. The symptoms of abdominal pain in these highl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brenner, Darren M., Lacy, Brian E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33993133
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001266
_version_ 1783729680613900288
author Brenner, Darren M.
Lacy, Brian E.
author_facet Brenner, Darren M.
Lacy, Brian E.
author_sort Brenner, Darren M.
collection PubMed
description Chronic abdominal pain is a common gastrointestinal (GI) symptom that characterizes many functional GI disorders/disorders of gut-brain interaction, including irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, and centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome. The symptoms of abdominal pain in these highly prevalent disorders are often treated with antispasmodic agents. Antispasmodic treatment includes a broad range of therapeutic classes with different mechanisms of action, including anticholinergic/antimuscarinic agents (inhibition of GI smooth muscle contraction), calcium channel inhibitors (inhibition of calcium transport into GI smooth muscle), and direct smooth muscle relaxants (inhibition of sodium and calcium transport). The aim of this review article was to examine the efficacy and safety of antispasmodics available in North America (e.g., alverine, dicyclomine, hyoscine, hyoscyamine, mebeverine, otilonium, pinaverium, and trimebutine) for the treatment of chronic abdominal pain in patients with common disorders of gut-brain interaction. For the agents examined, comparisons of studies are limited by inconsistencies in treatment dosing and duration, patient profiles, and diagnostic criteria employed. Furthermore, variability in study end points limits comparisons. Risk of selection, performance, detection, attrition, and reporting bias also differed among studies, and in many cases, risks were considered “unclear.” The antispasmodics evaluated in this review, which differ in geographic availability, were found to vary dramatically in efficacy and safety. Given these caveats, each agent should be considered on an individual basis, rather than prescribed based on information across the broad class of agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8315189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83151892021-08-02 Antispasmodics for Chronic Abdominal Pain: Analysis of North American Treatment Options Brenner, Darren M. Lacy, Brian E. Am J Gastroenterol Review Article Chronic abdominal pain is a common gastrointestinal (GI) symptom that characterizes many functional GI disorders/disorders of gut-brain interaction, including irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, and centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome. The symptoms of abdominal pain in these highly prevalent disorders are often treated with antispasmodic agents. Antispasmodic treatment includes a broad range of therapeutic classes with different mechanisms of action, including anticholinergic/antimuscarinic agents (inhibition of GI smooth muscle contraction), calcium channel inhibitors (inhibition of calcium transport into GI smooth muscle), and direct smooth muscle relaxants (inhibition of sodium and calcium transport). The aim of this review article was to examine the efficacy and safety of antispasmodics available in North America (e.g., alverine, dicyclomine, hyoscine, hyoscyamine, mebeverine, otilonium, pinaverium, and trimebutine) for the treatment of chronic abdominal pain in patients with common disorders of gut-brain interaction. For the agents examined, comparisons of studies are limited by inconsistencies in treatment dosing and duration, patient profiles, and diagnostic criteria employed. Furthermore, variability in study end points limits comparisons. Risk of selection, performance, detection, attrition, and reporting bias also differed among studies, and in many cases, risks were considered “unclear.” The antispasmodics evaluated in this review, which differ in geographic availability, were found to vary dramatically in efficacy and safety. Given these caveats, each agent should be considered on an individual basis, rather than prescribed based on information across the broad class of agents. Wolters Kluwer 2021-08 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8315189/ /pubmed/33993133 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001266 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Review Article
Brenner, Darren M.
Lacy, Brian E.
Antispasmodics for Chronic Abdominal Pain: Analysis of North American Treatment Options
title Antispasmodics for Chronic Abdominal Pain: Analysis of North American Treatment Options
title_full Antispasmodics for Chronic Abdominal Pain: Analysis of North American Treatment Options
title_fullStr Antispasmodics for Chronic Abdominal Pain: Analysis of North American Treatment Options
title_full_unstemmed Antispasmodics for Chronic Abdominal Pain: Analysis of North American Treatment Options
title_short Antispasmodics for Chronic Abdominal Pain: Analysis of North American Treatment Options
title_sort antispasmodics for chronic abdominal pain: analysis of north american treatment options
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33993133
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001266
work_keys_str_mv AT brennerdarrenm antispasmodicsforchronicabdominalpainanalysisofnorthamericantreatmentoptions
AT lacybriane antispasmodicsforchronicabdominalpainanalysisofnorthamericantreatmentoptions