Cargando…

Patients with suspected allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines can be safely revaccinated after diagnostic work‐up

BACKGROUND: When initiating the Danish vaccination program against COVID‐19, the incidence of anaphylaxis was estimated to be 10 times higher compared to other virus‐based vaccines. In this study, we present data on patients referred with suspected allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines. The main p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasmussen, Trine Holm, Mortz, Charlotte Gotthard, Georgsen, Torbjorn Kabel, Rasmussen, Helene Marlies, Kjaer, Henrik Fomsgaard, Bindslev‐Jensen, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12044
_version_ 1783729692728098816
author Rasmussen, Trine Holm
Mortz, Charlotte Gotthard
Georgsen, Torbjorn Kabel
Rasmussen, Helene Marlies
Kjaer, Henrik Fomsgaard
Bindslev‐Jensen, Carsten
author_facet Rasmussen, Trine Holm
Mortz, Charlotte Gotthard
Georgsen, Torbjorn Kabel
Rasmussen, Helene Marlies
Kjaer, Henrik Fomsgaard
Bindslev‐Jensen, Carsten
author_sort Rasmussen, Trine Holm
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When initiating the Danish vaccination program against COVID‐19, the incidence of anaphylaxis was estimated to be 10 times higher compared to other virus‐based vaccines. In this study, we present data on patients referred with suspected allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines. The main purpose of the study is to investigate the incidence and severity of the allergic reactions, and to evaluate the safety of revaccination. METHODS: All patients in the region of Southern Denmark with case histories of allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines in a defined period are included in this study. Diagnostic work up consisted of a detailed case history, evaluation of Brighton level of diagnostic certainty and World Allergy Organization grade of anaphylaxis and skin prick testing‐ and basophil histamine release testing with COVID‐19 vaccines and relevant drug excipients. Patients were revaccinated at the Allergy Center when possible. RESULTS: Sixty‐one patients are included in this study. In 199,377 doses administered, nine patients fulfilled the criteria of anaphylaxis when using the Brighton Criteria (incidence being 45 per million). Of 55 patients with reactions to the first dose, 52 patients were revaccinated without adverse reactions. We found no proven cases of immediate anaphylaxis due to COVID‐19 vaccines. By skin prick test, we diagnosed three patients with drug excipient allergy and further a patient with mastocytosis was found. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylactic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines are rare and the incidence is similar to what is seen with other virus‐based vaccines. Revaccination is safe in the majority of patients; however, allergological evaluation is important since some prove to have drug excipient allergy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8315275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83152752021-07-31 Patients with suspected allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines can be safely revaccinated after diagnostic work‐up Rasmussen, Trine Holm Mortz, Charlotte Gotthard Georgsen, Torbjorn Kabel Rasmussen, Helene Marlies Kjaer, Henrik Fomsgaard Bindslev‐Jensen, Carsten Clin Transl Allergy Research BACKGROUND: When initiating the Danish vaccination program against COVID‐19, the incidence of anaphylaxis was estimated to be 10 times higher compared to other virus‐based vaccines. In this study, we present data on patients referred with suspected allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines. The main purpose of the study is to investigate the incidence and severity of the allergic reactions, and to evaluate the safety of revaccination. METHODS: All patients in the region of Southern Denmark with case histories of allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines in a defined period are included in this study. Diagnostic work up consisted of a detailed case history, evaluation of Brighton level of diagnostic certainty and World Allergy Organization grade of anaphylaxis and skin prick testing‐ and basophil histamine release testing with COVID‐19 vaccines and relevant drug excipients. Patients were revaccinated at the Allergy Center when possible. RESULTS: Sixty‐one patients are included in this study. In 199,377 doses administered, nine patients fulfilled the criteria of anaphylaxis when using the Brighton Criteria (incidence being 45 per million). Of 55 patients with reactions to the first dose, 52 patients were revaccinated without adverse reactions. We found no proven cases of immediate anaphylaxis due to COVID‐19 vaccines. By skin prick test, we diagnosed three patients with drug excipient allergy and further a patient with mastocytosis was found. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylactic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines are rare and the incidence is similar to what is seen with other virus‐based vaccines. Revaccination is safe in the majority of patients; however, allergological evaluation is important since some prove to have drug excipient allergy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8315275/ /pubmed/34331522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12044 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rasmussen, Trine Holm
Mortz, Charlotte Gotthard
Georgsen, Torbjorn Kabel
Rasmussen, Helene Marlies
Kjaer, Henrik Fomsgaard
Bindslev‐Jensen, Carsten
Patients with suspected allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines can be safely revaccinated after diagnostic work‐up
title Patients with suspected allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines can be safely revaccinated after diagnostic work‐up
title_full Patients with suspected allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines can be safely revaccinated after diagnostic work‐up
title_fullStr Patients with suspected allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines can be safely revaccinated after diagnostic work‐up
title_full_unstemmed Patients with suspected allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines can be safely revaccinated after diagnostic work‐up
title_short Patients with suspected allergic reactions to COVID‐19 vaccines can be safely revaccinated after diagnostic work‐up
title_sort patients with suspected allergic reactions to covid‐19 vaccines can be safely revaccinated after diagnostic work‐up
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12044
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmussentrineholm patientswithsuspectedallergicreactionstocovid19vaccinescanbesafelyrevaccinatedafterdiagnosticworkup
AT mortzcharlottegotthard patientswithsuspectedallergicreactionstocovid19vaccinescanbesafelyrevaccinatedafterdiagnosticworkup
AT georgsentorbjornkabel patientswithsuspectedallergicreactionstocovid19vaccinescanbesafelyrevaccinatedafterdiagnosticworkup
AT rasmussenhelenemarlies patientswithsuspectedallergicreactionstocovid19vaccinescanbesafelyrevaccinatedafterdiagnosticworkup
AT kjaerhenrikfomsgaard patientswithsuspectedallergicreactionstocovid19vaccinescanbesafelyrevaccinatedafterdiagnosticworkup
AT bindslevjensencarsten patientswithsuspectedallergicreactionstocovid19vaccinescanbesafelyrevaccinatedafterdiagnosticworkup