Cargando…
Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia
OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence, treatment, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control of individuals with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL in contemporary clinical practice. METHODS: We included adults (age ≥18 years) with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, at least one LDL-C level drawn from 255 health system...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34327462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2020.100079 |
_version_ | 1783729702500827136 |
---|---|
author | Gold, Matthew E. Nanna, Michael G. Doerfler, Shannon M. Schibler, Tony Wojdyla, Daniel Peterson, Eric D. Navar, Ann Marie |
author_facet | Gold, Matthew E. Nanna, Michael G. Doerfler, Shannon M. Schibler, Tony Wojdyla, Daniel Peterson, Eric D. Navar, Ann Marie |
author_sort | Gold, Matthew E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence, treatment, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control of individuals with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL in contemporary clinical practice. METHODS: We included adults (age ≥18 years) with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, at least one LDL-C level drawn from 255 health systems participating in Cerner HealthFacts database (2000–2017, n = 4,623,851), and a detailed examination within Duke University Health System (DUHS, 2015–2017, n = 267,710). Factors associated with LDL-C control were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: The cross-sectional prevalence of LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL was 3.0% in Cerner (n = 139,539/4,623,851) and 2.9% at DUHS (n = 7728/267,710); among these, rates of repeat LDL-C measurement within 13 months were low: 27.9% (n = 38,960) in Cerner, 54.5% (n = 4211) at DUHS. Of patients with follow-up LDL-C levels, 23.6% in Cerner had a 50% of greater reduction in LDL-C, 18.3% achieved an LDL-C <100 mg/dL and 2.7% < 70 mg/dL. At DUHS, 28.4% had a 50% or greater reduction in LDL-C, 28.4% achieved an LDL-C ≤100 mg/dL and 4.4% achieved <70 mg/dL. Within DUHS, 71.6% with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL were on any statin during follow-up, but only 28.5% were on a high-intensity statin. In multivariable modeling, seeing a cardiologist (Cerner odds ratio [OR] 1.56, confidence interval [CI] 1.33–1.83; DUHS OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.18–3.01) and having diabetes (Cerner OR 1.34 CI 1.23–1.46; DUHS OR 2.07, CI 1.62–2.65) increased odds of LDL-C control, defined as a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C (at Cerner) or initiation of high intensity statin (at DUHS). Prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (OR 1.19, CI 1.07–1.33), hypertension (OR 1.10, CI 1.03–1.18), African American race (OR 0.79, CI 0.71–0.89), and government (vs. private) insurance (OR 0.90, CI 0.83–0.98) were associated with LDL-C control at Cerner. Female sex was associated with lower odds of appropriate therapy (OR 0.69, CI 0.59–0.81) at DUHS. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 3% of United States adults have LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL. Among those with very high LDL-C, rates of repeat measurement within one year were low; of those retested, only about one-fourth met guideline-recommended LDL-C treatment goals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8315339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83153392021-07-28 Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia Gold, Matthew E. Nanna, Michael G. Doerfler, Shannon M. Schibler, Tony Wojdyla, Daniel Peterson, Eric D. Navar, Ann Marie Am J Prev Cardiol Original Research OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence, treatment, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control of individuals with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL in contemporary clinical practice. METHODS: We included adults (age ≥18 years) with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, at least one LDL-C level drawn from 255 health systems participating in Cerner HealthFacts database (2000–2017, n = 4,623,851), and a detailed examination within Duke University Health System (DUHS, 2015–2017, n = 267,710). Factors associated with LDL-C control were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: The cross-sectional prevalence of LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL was 3.0% in Cerner (n = 139,539/4,623,851) and 2.9% at DUHS (n = 7728/267,710); among these, rates of repeat LDL-C measurement within 13 months were low: 27.9% (n = 38,960) in Cerner, 54.5% (n = 4211) at DUHS. Of patients with follow-up LDL-C levels, 23.6% in Cerner had a 50% of greater reduction in LDL-C, 18.3% achieved an LDL-C <100 mg/dL and 2.7% < 70 mg/dL. At DUHS, 28.4% had a 50% or greater reduction in LDL-C, 28.4% achieved an LDL-C ≤100 mg/dL and 4.4% achieved <70 mg/dL. Within DUHS, 71.6% with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL were on any statin during follow-up, but only 28.5% were on a high-intensity statin. In multivariable modeling, seeing a cardiologist (Cerner odds ratio [OR] 1.56, confidence interval [CI] 1.33–1.83; DUHS OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.18–3.01) and having diabetes (Cerner OR 1.34 CI 1.23–1.46; DUHS OR 2.07, CI 1.62–2.65) increased odds of LDL-C control, defined as a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C (at Cerner) or initiation of high intensity statin (at DUHS). Prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (OR 1.19, CI 1.07–1.33), hypertension (OR 1.10, CI 1.03–1.18), African American race (OR 0.79, CI 0.71–0.89), and government (vs. private) insurance (OR 0.90, CI 0.83–0.98) were associated with LDL-C control at Cerner. Female sex was associated with lower odds of appropriate therapy (OR 0.69, CI 0.59–0.81) at DUHS. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 3% of United States adults have LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL. Among those with very high LDL-C, rates of repeat measurement within one year were low; of those retested, only about one-fourth met guideline-recommended LDL-C treatment goals. Elsevier 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8315339/ /pubmed/34327462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2020.100079 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gold, Matthew E. Nanna, Michael G. Doerfler, Shannon M. Schibler, Tony Wojdyla, Daniel Peterson, Eric D. Navar, Ann Marie Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia |
title | Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia |
title_full | Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia |
title_fullStr | Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia |
title_short | Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia |
title_sort | prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34327462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2020.100079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goldmatthewe prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia AT nannamichaelg prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia AT doerflershannonm prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia AT schiblertony prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia AT wojdyladaniel prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia AT petersonericd prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia AT navarannmarie prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia |