Cargando…

Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence, treatment, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control of individuals with LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL in contemporary clinical practice. METHODS: We included adults (age ≥18 years) with LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL, at least one LDL-C level drawn from 255 health system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gold, Matthew E., Nanna, Michael G., Doerfler, Shannon M., Schibler, Tony, Wojdyla, Daniel, Peterson, Eric D., Navar, Ann Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34327462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2020.100079
_version_ 1783729702500827136
author Gold, Matthew E.
Nanna, Michael G.
Doerfler, Shannon M.
Schibler, Tony
Wojdyla, Daniel
Peterson, Eric D.
Navar, Ann Marie
author_facet Gold, Matthew E.
Nanna, Michael G.
Doerfler, Shannon M.
Schibler, Tony
Wojdyla, Daniel
Peterson, Eric D.
Navar, Ann Marie
author_sort Gold, Matthew E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence, treatment, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control of individuals with LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL in contemporary clinical practice. METHODS: We included adults (age ≥18 years) with LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL, at least one LDL-C level drawn from 255 health systems participating in Cerner HealthFacts database (2000–2017, n ​= ​4,623,851), and a detailed examination within Duke University Health System (DUHS, 2015–2017, n ​= ​267,710). Factors associated with LDL-C control were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: The cross-sectional prevalence of LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL was 3.0% in Cerner (n ​= ​139,539/4,623,851) and 2.9% at DUHS (n ​= ​7728/267,710); among these, rates of repeat LDL-C measurement within 13 months were low: 27.9% (n ​= ​38,960) in Cerner, 54.5% (n ​= ​4211) at DUHS. Of patients with follow-up LDL-C levels, 23.6% in Cerner had a 50% of greater reduction in LDL-C, 18.3% achieved an LDL-C <100 ​mg/dL and 2.7% ​< ​70 ​mg/dL. At DUHS, 28.4% had a 50% or greater reduction in LDL-C, 28.4% achieved an LDL-C ≤100 ​mg/dL and 4.4% achieved <70 ​mg/dL. Within DUHS, 71.6% with LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL were on any statin during follow-up, but only 28.5% were on a high-intensity statin. In multivariable modeling, seeing a cardiologist (Cerner odds ratio [OR] 1.56, confidence interval [CI] 1.33–1.83; DUHS OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.18–3.01) and having diabetes (Cerner OR 1.34 CI 1.23–1.46; DUHS OR 2.07, CI 1.62–2.65) increased odds of LDL-C control, defined as a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C (at Cerner) or initiation of high intensity statin (at DUHS). Prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (OR 1.19, CI 1.07–1.33), hypertension (OR 1.10, CI 1.03–1.18), African American race (OR 0.79, CI 0.71–0.89), and government (vs. private) insurance (OR 0.90, CI 0.83–0.98) were associated with LDL-C control at Cerner. Female sex was associated with lower odds of appropriate therapy (OR 0.69, CI 0.59–0.81) at DUHS. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 3% of United States adults have LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL. Among those with very high LDL-C, rates of repeat measurement within one year were low; of those retested, only about one-fourth met guideline-recommended LDL-C treatment goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8315339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83153392021-07-28 Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia Gold, Matthew E. Nanna, Michael G. Doerfler, Shannon M. Schibler, Tony Wojdyla, Daniel Peterson, Eric D. Navar, Ann Marie Am J Prev Cardiol Original Research OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence, treatment, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control of individuals with LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL in contemporary clinical practice. METHODS: We included adults (age ≥18 years) with LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL, at least one LDL-C level drawn from 255 health systems participating in Cerner HealthFacts database (2000–2017, n ​= ​4,623,851), and a detailed examination within Duke University Health System (DUHS, 2015–2017, n ​= ​267,710). Factors associated with LDL-C control were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: The cross-sectional prevalence of LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL was 3.0% in Cerner (n ​= ​139,539/4,623,851) and 2.9% at DUHS (n ​= ​7728/267,710); among these, rates of repeat LDL-C measurement within 13 months were low: 27.9% (n ​= ​38,960) in Cerner, 54.5% (n ​= ​4211) at DUHS. Of patients with follow-up LDL-C levels, 23.6% in Cerner had a 50% of greater reduction in LDL-C, 18.3% achieved an LDL-C <100 ​mg/dL and 2.7% ​< ​70 ​mg/dL. At DUHS, 28.4% had a 50% or greater reduction in LDL-C, 28.4% achieved an LDL-C ≤100 ​mg/dL and 4.4% achieved <70 ​mg/dL. Within DUHS, 71.6% with LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL were on any statin during follow-up, but only 28.5% were on a high-intensity statin. In multivariable modeling, seeing a cardiologist (Cerner odds ratio [OR] 1.56, confidence interval [CI] 1.33–1.83; DUHS OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.18–3.01) and having diabetes (Cerner OR 1.34 CI 1.23–1.46; DUHS OR 2.07, CI 1.62–2.65) increased odds of LDL-C control, defined as a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C (at Cerner) or initiation of high intensity statin (at DUHS). Prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (OR 1.19, CI 1.07–1.33), hypertension (OR 1.10, CI 1.03–1.18), African American race (OR 0.79, CI 0.71–0.89), and government (vs. private) insurance (OR 0.90, CI 0.83–0.98) were associated with LDL-C control at Cerner. Female sex was associated with lower odds of appropriate therapy (OR 0.69, CI 0.59–0.81) at DUHS. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 3% of United States adults have LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL. Among those with very high LDL-C, rates of repeat measurement within one year were low; of those retested, only about one-fourth met guideline-recommended LDL-C treatment goals. Elsevier 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8315339/ /pubmed/34327462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2020.100079 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gold, Matthew E.
Nanna, Michael G.
Doerfler, Shannon M.
Schibler, Tony
Wojdyla, Daniel
Peterson, Eric D.
Navar, Ann Marie
Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia
title Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia
title_full Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia
title_fullStr Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia
title_short Prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia
title_sort prevalence, treatment, and control of severe hyperlipidemia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34327462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2020.100079
work_keys_str_mv AT goldmatthewe prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia
AT nannamichaelg prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia
AT doerflershannonm prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia
AT schiblertony prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia
AT wojdyladaniel prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia
AT petersonericd prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia
AT navarannmarie prevalencetreatmentandcontrolofseverehyperlipidemia